高等学校化学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 432.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20200622
收稿日期:
2020-08-31
出版日期:
2021-02-10
发布日期:
2020-11-30
通讯作者:
翟锦
E-mail:zhaijin@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
Received:
2020-08-31
Online:
2021-02-10
Published:
2020-11-30
Contact:
ZHAI Jin
E-mail:zhaijin@buaa.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
生物启发的仿生人工纳流体通道以其可控的几何结构和可调的化学性质而迅速发展成为一个热门研究领域, 其中, 基于二维(2D)纳米材料的二维纳流体通道具有易于制造、 高效的化学改性和致密堆积的片层通道结构以及流体阻力小等优势而受到广泛关注, 预期在渗透能转换方面具有巨大的潜力. 本文简要介绍了二维纳流体通道的特征及优势; 基于二维仿生能量转换体系最新进展以及对二维纳流体通道能量转化发展前景进行了展望.
中图分类号:
TrendMD:
董其政, 翟锦. 基于二维材料的仿生纳流体通道在能量转化中的应用. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 432.
DONG Qizheng, ZHAI Jin. Application of Biomimetic Nanofluidic Channel Based on Two-dimensional Materials in Energy Conversion. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(2): 432.
Fig.1 Material design and large?scale integration of artificial nanofluid devices termed two?dimensional nanofluids inspired by the microstructure of nacreIn this structure, fluid channels are sandwiched between two?dimensional nanomaterials, and ions can be transported both horizontally and vertically. Inspired by the power generation process of electric eel, two?dimensional nanofluid devices are used for energy collection.
Fig.2 Schematic diagram of the experimental device(A), the transmembrane ionic conductance is concentration dependent and shows saturation from below 10-3 mol/L(B), the relationship between ion current and the applied pressure difference and environmental pH through the GHM(C, D), the synchronous electrical signal obtained by switching the transmembrane pressure difference(E)[72]Copyright 2013, Wiley?VCH.
Fig.3 Schematic diagram of experimental device(A), synchronous electrical signal obtained by switching across membrane pressure difference(B), schematic diagram of multiple membrane devices paralleling into a power group(C), current response of two kinds of membrane devices before and after parallel connection(D)[74]Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Fig.4 Schematic diagram of a two?dimensional nanofluidic device for salinity gradient power generation(A), the output power density of the device based on stacked graphene oxide films closed to 0.77 W/m2 at a concentration gradient of 0.5 mol/L/0.01 mol/L NaCl(B), a diagram of a graphene oxide film tandem stacking device(C), stacking the GOM in series(generated up to 2.7 V) used to power real electronic devices, such as calculators and light?emitting diodes(LEDs)(D)[77]Copyright 2017, Wiley?VCH.
Fig.5 Crystal structure of kaolinite(1∶1 type) and two different types of layered nanochannels in kaolinite membrane(RKM)(A), XRD of two kinds of nanochannels[their height is about 13.8 and 6.8 ?(1 ?=0.1 nm) respectively](B), function of transmembrane ionic conductivity varying with KCl concentration(C), at 100 times KCl concentration gradient, the output power of RKM is 0.18 W/m2(D)[75]Copyright 2017, Wiley?VCH.
Fig.6 Schematic diagram of ion transport across the MXene membrane(A), relationship of the concentration gradient on both sides of the MXene membrane and the output power density(output power density upto 20.85 W/m2 at 1000 times KCl concentration gradient)(B), function of output power density varying with temperature at 100 times KCl concentration gradient(produces power density up to 54 W/m2 at 331 K)(C)[49], internal structure diagram of MXene/ANF compo? site membrane(D), concentration battery based on MXene composite mode supplied power for external circuit load(E), mixed artificial seawater(0.5 mol/L NaCl) and river water(0.01 mol/L NaCl) with output power density of 4.6 W/m2(F)[82](A―C) Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society; (D―F) Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
Fig.7 Power output of BP membrane at 0.5 mol/L/0.01 mol/L NaCl salinity gradient(A), function of output power density and O2 concentration(B), schematic diagram of transmembrane ion transport of multilayer BP composite membrane under concentration gradient(C), energy output power of composite membrane by sequential self?assembly(triangle) under natural seawater and river water concentration gradient(4.7 W/m2)(D)[83]Copyright 2020, PNAS.Org.
Fig.8 Experimental setup of ion transport across graphene oxide/SNF/graphene oxide multilayer assembled composite membrane(A), the output power density of the system through mixing natural seawater(0.5 mol/L NaCl) and river water(0.01 mol/L NaCl)(B), the function of output power density and temperature under 50 times NaCl concentration gradient(C)[84]Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Fig.9 Adsorbed water molecules in the gradient GO film(A) inducing a proton concentration gradient(B), the protons from the bottom to the top side driven by the concentration gradient(C), building up an electric potential and current(D), generated voltage(E) and current(F) under intermittent relative humidity(RH) variation[85]Copyright 2015, Wiley?VCH.
Fig.10 Self?supporting graphene oxide PAA Composite Membrane(GPM)(A), schematic diagram of graphene?based nanofluidic energy collection device driven by bioenergy(B), ionic current response(C) and membrane potential(D) response of enzyme catalyzed cross GPM in human urine[86]Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
1 | Kühlbrandt W., Nature, 2000, 406(6796), 569―570 |
2 | Jin Y., Honig T., Ron I., Friedman N., Sheves M., Cahen D., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37(11), 2422―2432 |
3 | Marx D., Chemphyschem., 2006, 7(9), 1848―1870 |
4 | Mohammed O. F., Pines D., Dreyer, J., Pines E., Nibbering E. T. J., Science, 2005, 310(5745), 83―86 |
5 | Frigaard N. U., Martinez A., Mincer T. J., de Long E. F., Nature, 2006, 439(7078), 847―850 |
6 | Beja O., Aravind L., Koonin E. V., Suzuki M. T., Hadd A., Nguyen L. P., Jovanovich S., Gates C. M., Feldman R. A., Spudich J. L., Spudich E. N., DeLong E. F., Science, 2000, 289(5486), 1902―1906 |
7 | Altamirano M., J. Cell. Compar. Physiol., 1955, 46(2), 249―277 |
8 | Thornhill W. B., Watanabe I., Sutachan J. J., Wu M. B., Wu X., Zhu J., J. Membrane. Biol., 2003, 196(1), 1―8 |
9 | Xu J., Lavan D. A., Nat. Nanotechnol., 2008, 3(11), 666―670 |
10 | Rosenberg R. L., Tomiko S. A., Agnew W. S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1984, 81(17), 5594―5598 |
11 | Toth B. I., Olah A., Szoellosi A. G., Biro T., Brit. J. Pharmacol., 2014, 171(10), 2568―2581 |
12 | Lumpkin E. A., Caterina M. J., Nature, 2007, 445(7130), 858―865 |
13 | Talavera K., Nilius B., Voets T., Trends Neurosci., 2008, 31(6), 287―295 |
14 | Gokel G. W., Negin S., Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46(12), 2824―2833 |
15 | Wen L., Jiang L., Natl. Sci. Rev., 2014, 1(1), 144―156 |
16 | Apel P., Radiat. Meas., 2001, 34(1―6), 559―566 |
17 | Masuda H., Fukuda K., Science,1995, 268(5216), 1466―1468 |
18 | Li J., Stein D., McMullan C., Branton D., Aziz M. J., Golovchenko J. A., Nature, 2001, 412(6843), 166―169 |
19 | Zhang B., Zhang Y. H., White H. S., Anal. Chem., 2004, 76(21), 6229―6238 |
20 | Yameen B., Ali M., Neumann R., Ensinger W., Knoll W., Azzaroni O., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(6), 2070―2071 |
21 | Xia F., Guo W., Mao Y., Hou X., Xue J., Xia H., Wang L., Song Y., Ji H., Qi O., Wang Y., Jiang L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(26), 8345―8350 |
22 | Yameen B., Ali M., Neumann R., Ensinger W., Knoll W., Azzaroni O., Small, 2009, 5(11), 1287―1291 |
23 | Guo W., Xia H., Xia F., Hou X., Cao L., Wang L., Xue J., Zhang G., Song Y., Zhu D., Wang Y., Jiang L., ChemPhysChem, 2010, 11(4), 859―864 |
24 | Vlassiouk I., Park C. D., Vail S. A., Gust D., Smirnov S., Nano Lett., 2006, 6(5), 1013―1017 |
25 | Wang G., Bohaty A. K., Zharov I., White H. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128(41), 13553―13558 |
26 | Tian Y., Zhang Z., Wen L., Ma J., Zhang Y., Liu W., Zhai J., Jiang L., Chem. Commun., 2013, 49(91), 10679―10681 |
27 | Liu Q., Xiao, K., Wen L., Dong Y., Xie G., Zhang Z., Bo Z., Jiang L., ACS Nano, 2014, 8(12), 12292―12299 |
28 | Sun Y., Chen S., Chen X., Xu Y., Zhang S., Ouyang Q., Yang G., Li H., Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 1323 |
29 | Xu Y., Sui X., Guan S., Zhai J., Gao L., Adv. Mater., 2015, 27(11), 1851―1855 |
30 | Hou X., Guo W., Jiang L., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40(5), 2385―2401 |
31 | Tang Z., Kotov N. A., Magonov S., Ozturk B., Nat. Mater., 2003, 2(6), 413―418 |
32 | Koltonow A. R., Huang J., Science, 2016, 351(6280), 1395―1396 |
33 | Karim M. R., Hatakeyama K., Matsui T., Takehira H., Taniguchi T., Koinuma M., Matsumoto Y., Akutagawa T., Nakamura T., Noro S., Yamada T., Kitagawa H., Hayami S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135(22), 8097―8100 |
34 | Zhang X., Wen Q., Wang L., Ding L., Yang J., Ji D., Zhang Y., Jiang L., Guo W., ACS Nano, 2019, 13(4), 4238―4245 |
35 | Shao J. J., Raidongia K., Koltonow A. R., Huang J., Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 7602 |
36 | Liu M. L., Huang M., Tian L.Y., Zhao L. H., Ding B., Kong D. B., Yang Q. H., Shao J. J., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(51), 44915―44923 |
37 | Lao J., Lv R., Gao J., Wang A., Wu J., Luo J., ACS Nano, 2018, 12(12), 12464―12471 |
38 | Wang Y., Zhang H., Kang Y., Zhu Y., Simon G. P., Wang H., ACS Nano, 2019, 13(10), 11793―11799 |
39 | Xiao K., Giusto P., Wen L., Jiang L., Antonietti M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(32), 10123―10126 |
40 | Zhou K. G., Vasu K. S., Cherian C. T., Neek⁃Amal M., Zhang J. C., Ghorbanfekr⁃Kalashami H., Huang K., Marshall O. P., Kravets V. G., Abraham J., Su Y., Grigorenko A. N., Pratt A., Geim A. K., Peeters F. M., Novoselov K. S., Nair R. R., Nature, 2018, 559(7713), 236―240 |
41 | Cheng C., Jiang G., Garvey C. J., Wang Y., Simon G. P., Liu J. Z., Li D., Sci. Adv., 2016, 2(2), e1501272 |
42 | Chen L., Shi G., Shen J., Peng B., Zhang B., Wang Y., Bian F., Wang J., Li D., Qian Z., Xu G., Liu G., Zeng J., Zhang L., Yang Y., Zhou G., Wu M., Jin W., Li J., Fang H., Nature, 2017, 550(7676), 415―418 |
43 | Xiao T., Liu Q., Zhang Q., Liu Z., Zhai J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121(34), 18954―18961 |
44 | Cao L., Xiao F., Feng Y., Zhu W., Geng W., Yang J., Zhang X., Li N., Guo W., Jiang L., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27(9), 1604302 |
45 | Marsh K. L., Souliman, M., Kaner R. B., Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(1), 187―190 |
46 | Lee D., Lee B., Park K. H., Ryu H. J., Jeon S., Hong S. H., Nano Lett., 2015, 15(2), 1238―1244 |
47 | Weng Q., Wang B., Wang X., Hanagata N., Li X., Liu D., Wang X., Jiang X., Bando Y., Golberg D., ACS Nano, 2014, 8(6), 6123―6130 |
48 | Raidongia K., Huang J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134(40), 16528―16531 |
49 | Hong S., Ming F., Shi Y., Li R., Kim I. S., Tang C. Y., Alshareef H. N., Wang P., ACS Nano, 2019, 13(8), 8917―8925 |
50 | Joshi R. K., Carbone P., Wang F. C., Kravets V. G., Su Y., Grigorieva I. V., Wu H. A., Geim A. K., Nair R. R., Science, 2014, 343(6172), 752―754 |
51 | Zheng Z., Gruenker R., Feng X., Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(31), 6529―6545 |
52 | Li J., Cheng X., Shashurin A., Keidar M., Graphene, 2012, 1(1), 1―13 |
53 | Dikin D. A., Stankovich S., Zimney E. J., Piner R. D., Dommett G. H. B., Evmenenko G., Nguyen S. B. T., Ruoff R. S., Nature, 2007, 448(7152), 457―460 |
54 | Tsou C. H., An Q. F., Lo S. C., de Guzman M., Hung W. S., Hu C. C., Lee K. R., Lai J. Y., J. Membr. Sci., 2015, 477, 93―100 |
55 | Chen C., Yang Q. H., Yang Y., Lv W., Wen Y., Hou P. X., Wang M., Cheng H. M., Adv. Mater., 2009, 21(29), 3007―3011 |
56 | Liu Z., Li Z., Xu Z., Xia Z., Hu X., Kou L., Peng L., Wei Y., Gao C., Chem. Mater., 2014, 26(23), 6786―6795 |
57 | Ma M., Tocci G., Michaelides A., Aeppli G., Nat. Mater., 2016, 15(1), 66―71 |
58 | Kannam S. K., Todd B. D., Hansen J. S., Daivis P. J., J. Chem. Phys., 2011, 135(14), 144701 |
59 | Li R., Sui X., Li C., Jiang J., Zhai J., Gao L., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(4), 3241―3247 |
60 | Gokel G. W., Negin S., Acc Chem. Res., 2013, 46(12), 2824―2833 |
61 | Yameen B., Ali M., Neumann R., Ensinger W., Knoll W., Azzaroni O., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(6), 2070―2071 |
62 | Vlassiouk I., Park C.D., Vail S. A., Gust D., Smirnov S., Nano Lett., 2006, 6(5), 1013―1017 |
63 | Coleman J. N., Lotya M., O'Neill A., Bergin S. D., King P. J., Khan U., Young K., Gaucher A., De S., Smith R. J., Science, 2011, 331(6017), 568―571 |
64 | Ding L., Xiao D., Lu Z., Deng J., Wei Y., Caro J., Wang H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59(22), 8720―8726 |
65 | Zhang X. P., Wen Q., Wang L. L., Ding L. P., Yang J. L., Ji D. Y., Zhang Y. B., Jiang L., Guo W., ACS Nano, 2019, 13(4), 4238―424 |
66 | Loh K. P., Bao Q., Ang P. K., Yang J., J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20(12), 2277―2289 |
67 | Guan K., Zhao D., Zhang M., Shen J., Zhou G., Liu G., Jin W., J. Membr. Sci., 2017, 542, 41―51 |
68 | Ding L., Wei Y., Wang Y., Chen H., Caro J., Wang H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56(7), 1825―1829 |
69 | Yang X., Cheng C., Wang Y., Qiu L., Li D., Science, 2013, 341(6145), 534―537 |
70 | Huang H., Song Z., Wei N., Shi L., Mao Y., Ying Y., Sun L., Xu Z., Peng X., Nat. Commun., 2013, 4, 2979 |
71 | Abraham J., Vasu K. S., Williams C. D., Gopinadhan K., Su Y., Cherian C. T., Dix J., Prestat E., Haigh S. J., Grigorieva I. V., Carbone P., Geim A. K., Nair R. R., Nat. Nanotechnol.,2017, 12(6), 546―550 |
72 | Guo W., Cheng C., Wu Y., Jiang Y., Gao J., Li D., Jiang L., Adv. Mater., 2013, 25(42), 6064―6068 |
73 | Van der Heyden F. H. J., Stein D., Dekker C., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 95(11), 116104 |
74 | Qin S., Liu D., Chen Y., Chen C., Wang G., Wang J., Razal J. M., Lei W., Nano Energy, 2018, 47, 368―373 |
75 | Cheng H., Zhou Y., Feng Y., Geng W., Liu Q., Guo W., Jiang L., Adv. Mater., 2017, 29(23), 1700177 |
76 | Logan B. E., Elimelech M., Nature, 2012, 488(7411), 313―319 |
77 | Ji J., Kang Q., Zhou Y., Feng Y., Chen X., Yuan J., Guo W., Wei Y., Jiang L., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27(2), 1603623 |
78 | Naguib M., Kurtoglu M., Presser V., Lu J., Niu J., Heon M., Hultman L., Gogotsi Y., Barsoum M. W., Adv. Mater., 2011, 23(37), 4248―4253 |
79 | Li J., Yuan X., Lin C., Yang Y., Xu L., Du X., Xie J., Lin J., Sun J., Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7(15), 1602725 |
80 | Er D., Li J., Naguib M., Gogotsi Y., Shenoy V. B., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6(14), 11173―11179 |
81 | Shahzad F., Alhabeb M., Hatter C. B., Anasori B., Hong S. M., Koo C. M., Gogotsi Y., Science,2016, 353(6304), 1137―1140 |
82 | Zhang Z., Yang S., Zhang P., Zhang J., Chen G., Feng X., Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 2920 |
83 | Zhang Z., Zhang P., Yang S., Zhang T., Loeffler M., Shi H., Lohe M. R., Feng X., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,2020, 117(25), 13959―13966 |
84 | Xin W., Xiao H., Kong X.Y., Chen J., Yang L., Niu B., Qian Y., Teng Y., Jiang L., Wen L., ACS Nano, 2020, 14(8), 9701― 9710 |
85 | Zhao F., Cheng H., Zhang Z., Jiang L., Qu L., Adv. Mater., 2015, 27(29), 4351―4357 |
86 | Lin L., Zhang L., Wang L., Li J., Chem. Sci., 2016, 7(6), 3645―3648 |
[1] | 张义超, 赵付来, 王宇, 王亚玲, 沈永涛, 冯奕钰, 封伟. 基于多层二硒化钨的高性能场效应晶体管的实验优化和理论模拟[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(6): 20220113. |
[2] | 王方圆, 张奋娴, 李毅, 高建华, 牛颜冰, 申少斐. 仿生树叶模型的制作及在琼脂糖微流控芯片中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(11): 20220445. |
[3] | 左怀龙, 雷思敏, 张锐, 李玉新, 陈伟. 新型异喹啉衍生物的设计合成及抑菌活性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(9): 2766. |
[4] | 李淑荟, 黄剑莹, 赖跃坤. 绿色环保特殊浸润性纺织品的前沿进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(4): 1043. |
[5] | 王昱芃, 赵洋, 李茉涵, 史素青, 宫永宽. 多巴胺基多重相互作用协同构筑抗污-杀菌双重功能涂层[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(3): 811. |
[6] | 辛伟闻, 闻利平. 二维材料用于渗透能转换的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 445. |
[7] | 史江维, 孟楠楠, 郭亚梅, 于一夫, 张兵 . 二维材料用于电催化析氢的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 492. |
[8] | 陈明华, 李宏武, 范鹤, 李誉, 刘威铎, 夏新辉, 陈庆国. 二维过渡金属硫族化合物在超级电容器中的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 539. |
[9] | 王伟, 卢香超, 周立军, 鲁艺珍, 曹阳. 基于二维压电材料功能性器件的设计、 构筑与性能研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 595. |
[10] | 林生晃, 傅年庆, 鲍桥梁. 单元素二维材料及其衍生物作为电荷传输层在太阳能电池中应用的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 412. |
[11] | 陈晓煜, 于然波. 纳米二硫化钼的掺杂及催化电解水产氢的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 475. |
[12] | 邓亚茜, 吴志坦, 吕伟, 陶莹, 杨全红. 二维材料的凝胶化及电化学储能应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 380. |
[13] | 余强敏, 张致远, 罗雨婷, 李洋, 成会明, 刘碧录. 金属性二维过渡金属硫化物的溶剂热合成及电催化析氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 654. |
[14] | 解忱, 陈娜, 杨雁冰, 袁荃. 核酸适体功能化的二维材料场效应晶体管传感器研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(11): 3406. |
[15] | 张鑫, 赵付来, 王宇, 梁雪静, 冯奕钰, 封伟. 碲化锗场效应晶体管的制备及电学性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(9): 2032. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||