基于金属-有机骨架Fe-MIL-88NH2的凝血酶适体传感器

doi:10.7503/cjcu20180563

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

合成了一种含氨基的金属-有机骨架材料Fe-MIL-88NH₂, 并研制一种基于Fe-MIL-88NH₂的适用于快速检测凝血酶的三明治型适体传感器. 以掺杂金纳米颗粒的共价有机框架材料Au NPs@COF-LZU-8复合材料作为固定基质固定凝血酶适体Ⅰ, 凝血酶与适体Ⅰ特异性结合后, 再与通过戊二醛交联制得的凝血酶适体Ⅱ(Apt)-Fe-MIL-88NH₂复合物结合, 采用差分脉冲伏安法直接检测标记物Fe-MIL-88NH₂中铁离子(Fe³⁺)的还原峰电流. Fe-MIL-88NH₂中Fe³⁺的电流响应值与凝血酶浓度在0.5~200 ng/mL范围内呈正比, 线性相关系数为0.987, 检测限为0.167 ng/mL. 该传感器简化了实验步骤, 扩大了MOFs的应用范围, 为设计生物传感器开辟了新思路.

关键词: 凝血酶, 金属有机骨架, Fe-MIL-88NH₂, 适体传感器, 三明治型

Abstract:

A sandwich-type aptasensor based on the metal-organic framework Fe-MIL-88NH₂ for the rapid detection of thrombin was developed. Amino-functionalized metal-organic framework(Fe-MOFs), Fe-MIL-88NH₂, was used as a label, which was covalently cross linked with amino-modified thrombin aptamer Ⅱ through glutaraldehyde. Gold nanoparticle modified covalent organic frameworks(Au NPs@COF-LZU-8) with high electronic conductivity was employed as the substrate to immobilize thiolated thrombin aptamer Ⅰ(TBAⅠ). After thrombin binds specifically with TBAⅠ, it combines with Fe-MIL-88NH₂ labeled thrombin aptamer Ⅱ. Then, iron ions(Fe³⁺) from Fe-MIL-88NH₂ were directly detected without acid dissolution and preconcentration. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the current response of Fe³⁺ in Fe-MIL-88NH₂ was directly proportional to the concentration of thrombin in the range of 0.5—200 ng/mL, with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.987 and a detection limit of 0.167 ng/mL. In this strategy, the detecting steps were greatly simplified. This article expands the application range of MOFs.

Key words: Thrombin, Fe-metal-organic framework, Fe-MIL-88NH₂, Aptasensor, Sandwich type

中图分类号:

O657.1

TrendMD:

李德蕾, 谷梦巧, 王敏, 迟宽能, 张茜, 邓燕, 马玉婵, 胡蓉, 杨云慧. 基于金属-有机骨架Fe-MIL-88NH₂的凝血酶适体传感器. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(3): 439.

LI Delei,GU Mengqiao,WANG Min,CHI Kuanneng,ZHANG Xi,DENG Yan,MA Yuchan,HU Rong,YANG Yunhui. Preparation of Thrombin Aptasensor Based on the Metal-organic Framework Fe-MIL-88N $H 2 †$ . Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2019, 40(3): 439.

图/表 13

Fig.1 3D structure(A) and planar structure(B) diagrams of Fe-MIL-88NH2

Fig.2 Stepwise procedure of the aptasensor

Fig.3 TEM images of COF-LZU-8(A) and Au NPs@COF-LZU-8(B)

Fig.4 XRD pattern of COF-LZU-8

Fig.5 SEM images of Fe-MIL-88NH2

Fig.6 XRD patterns of standard(A) and synthesized(B) Fe-MIL-88NH2

Fig.7 DPV response curves of interfaces at diffe-rent modified electrode in PBS buffer solutiona. TB/TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE; b. TBAⅡ-Fe-MIL-88NH2/TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE; c. TBAⅡ-Fe-MIL-88NH2/TB/TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE.

Fig.8 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy(EIS) of interfaces at different modified electrode in 5 mmol/L K3Fe(CN)6/K4Fe(CN)6a. Bare GCE; b. Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE; c. TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE; d. MCH/TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE; e. TB/MCH/TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE; f. TBAⅡ-Fe-MIL-88NH2/TB/MCH/TBAⅠ/Au NPs@COF-LZU-8/Chit/GCE.

Fig.9 Effects of buffer type(A), pH values(B), TBAⅠconcentration(C) and the incubation time(D) on sensing signals of the aptasensor between TB and TBAⅡ-Fe-MIL-88NH2 bioconjugates

Fig.10 Calibration curve of aptasensor in PBS solution(A) and DPV response of aptasensor to different concentrations of TB(B)(B) c(TB)/(ng·mL-1), a.—i.: 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200.

Table 1 Comparison of different detecting methods for TB

No.	Method	Linear range/ (nmol·L^-1)	Detection limit/ (nmol·L^-1)	Ref.
1	Electrochemical aptasensor	0.099—55	0.099	[26]
2	Electrochemical aptasensor	0.298—49.5	0.0099	[27]
3	Label-free electrochemical aptasensor	0.12—46	0.4	[28]
4	Exonuclease Ⅲ-aided electrochemical detection(DPV)	0.005—1.0	0.005	[29]
	SWV	0.010—10.0	0.0012	[30]
5	Electrochemical aptasensor	0.0135—5.4	0.0045	This work

Fig.11 Selectivity of the aptasensor

Table 2 Recovery of aptasensor

Sample	Added/ (ng·mL^-1)	Found/ (ng·mL^-1)	RSD(%)	Recovery (%)	Sample	Added/ (ng·mL^-1)	Found/ (ng·mL^-1)	RSD(%)	Recovery (%)
1	0	0.31	15.3	3		10.00	9.33		90.7
	0	0.24			4	50.00	51.42	3.02	102.3
	0	0.24				50.00	53.34		106.2
2	5.00	5.08	2.20	96.6		50.00	50.95		101.4
	5.00	5.29		100.6	5	100	97.6	1.90	97.3
	5.00	5.11		97.0		100	101.2		100.9
3	10.00	10.04	4.05	97.8		100	100.4		100.1
	10.00	9.99		97.3

参考文献 30

[1]	Zhang Z. M., Strait Pharm J., 2006, 18(6), 1—3
	(张智明. 海峡药学, 2006, 18(6), 1—3)
[2]	Holland C. A., Henry A. T., Whinna H. C., Church F. C., FEBS Lett., 2000, 484(2), 87—91
[3]	Tu Y. H., Cheng G. F., Lin L., Zheng J., Wu Z. R., He P. G., Fang Y. Z., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2006, 27(12), 2266—2270
	(徒永华, 程圭芳, 林莉, 郑静, 吴自荣, 何品刚, 方禹之, 高等学校化学学报, 2006, 27(12), 2266—2270)
[4]	Ellington A. D., Szostak J. W., Nature, 1990, 346(6287), 818—822
[5]	Tasset D.M.., Kubik M. F., Steiner W.,J. Mol. Bio., 1997, 272(5), 688—698
[6]	Wang K., Liao J., Yang X., Zhao M., Chen M., Yao W., Tan W., Lan X., Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015, 63, 172—177
[7]	He P., Liu L., Qiao W., Zhang S., Chem. Commun., 2014, 50(12), 1481—1484
[8]	Wang S., Bi S., Wang Z., Xia J., Zhang F., Yang M., Gui R., Li Y., Xia Y., Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(37), 7927—7930
[9]	Xu W., Yi H., Yuan Y., Jing P., Chai Y., Yuan R., Wilson G. S., Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015, 64, 423—428
[10]	Zheng Y., Yuan Y., Chai Y., Yuan R., Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015, 66, 585—589
[11]	Shih Y., Zen J.M.., Yang H. H.,J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2002, 29(5), 827—833
[12]	Rowsell J.L. C.., Yaghi O. M.,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128(4), 1304—1315
[13]	Dong S., Suo G., Li N., Sens. Actuators B, 2016, 222, 972—979
[14]	Liu T. Z., Hu R., Zhang X., Zhang K. L., Liu Y., Zhang X. B., Bai R. Y., Li D. L., Yang Y. H., Anal. Chem., 2016, 88(24), 12516—12523
[15]	Bauer S., Serre C., Devic T., Horcajada P., Marrot J., Ferey G., Stock N., Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47(17), 7568—7576
[16]	Wang W., Acta Chim. Sinica, 2015, 73(6), 461—462
	(王为. 化学学报, 2015, 73(6), 461—462)
[17]	Feng X., Ding X., Jiang D., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41(18), 6010—6022
[18]	Cote A. P., Benin A. I., Ockwig N. W., O’keeffe M., Matzger A. J., Yaghi O. M., Science, 2005, 310(5751), 1166—1170
[19]	Li L. L., Liu S., Zhang Q., Hu N. T., Wei L. M., Yang Z., Wei H., Acta Phys.-Chim. Sinica, 2017, 33(10), 1960—1977
	(李路路, 刘帅, 章琴, 胡南滔, 魏良明, 杨志, 魏浩. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(10), 1960—1977)
[20]	Liu T. Z., Xia J. R., Li Y., Chen W. K., Zhang S., Liu Y., Zheng L., Yang Y. H., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2015, 36(10), 1880—1887
	(刘婷知, 夏介仁, 李瑶, 陈文凯, 张帅, 刘仪, 郑丽, 杨云慧. 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36(10), 1880—1887
[21]	Ding S. Y., Wang W., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42(2), 548—568
[22]	Taylor-Pashow K.M. L.., Della R. J., Xie Z., Tran S., Lin W.,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(40), 14261—14263
[23]	Liu Y. L., Zhao X. J., Yang X. X., Li Y. F., Analyst, 2013, 138(16), 4526—4531
[24]	Kimling J., Maier M., Okenve B., Kotaidis V., Ballot H., Plech A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110(32), 15700—15707
[25]	Zhao D. Y., Peng Y., Xu L. H., Zhou W., Wang Q., Guo L., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7(42), 23418—23422
[26]	Bai Y. F., Feng F., Zhao L., Wang C. Y., Wang H. Y., Tian M. Z., Qin J., Duan Y. L., He X. X., Biosens. Bioelectron., 2013, 47, 265—270
[27]	Wang Q. Q., Zhou Z. X., Zhai Y. L., Zhang L. L., Hong W., Zhang Z. Q., Dong X. J., Talanta, 2015, 141, 247—252
[28]	Yuan Y. L., Yuan R., Chai Y. Q., Zhuo Y., Liu Z. Y., Guan S., Qian X. Q., Chinese J. Anal. Chem., 2009, 37, F118
	(袁亚利, 袁若, 柴雅琴, 卓颖, 刘中原, 管姝, 钱孝清. 分析化学, 2009, 37, F118)
[29]	Liu S., Lin Y., Wang L., Liu T., Cheng C., Wei W., Tang B., Anal. Chem., 2014, 86(8), 4008—4015
[30]	Su S., Sun H. F., Cao W. F., Chao J., Peng H. Z., Zuo X. L., Yuwen L. H., Fan C. H., Wang L. H., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(11), 6826—6833

基于金属-有机骨架Fe-MIL-88NH₂的凝血酶适体传感器

Preparation of Thrombin Aptasensor Based on the Metal-organic Framework Fe-MIL-88N $H 2 †$

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李玉龙, 谢发婷, 管燕, 刘嘉丽, 张贵群, 姚超, 杨通, 杨云慧, 胡蓉. 基于银离子与DNA相互作用的比率型电化学传感器用于银离子的检测[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(8): 20220202.
[2]	丁杨, 王万辉, 包明. 多孔骨架固定分子催化剂催化CO₂加氢制备甲酸研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(7): 20220309.
[3]	鲁聪, 李振华, 刘金露, 华佳, 李光华, 施展, 冯守华. 一种新的镧系金属有机骨架材料的合成、结构及荧光检测性质[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(6): 20220037.
[4]	邢珮琪, 陆通, 李光华, 王力彦. 两个镉(II)金属有机骨架的可控合成与结构相关性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(10): 20220218.
[5]	李文, 乔珺一, 刘鑫垚, 刘云凌. 含萘基团的锆金属有机骨架材料对水中硝基芳烃爆炸物的荧光检测性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(1): 20210654.
[6]	魏闯宇, 陈艳丽, 姜建壮. 基于乙硫基取代的三层酞菁铕二聚体修饰ITO电极构筑电化学多巴胺和尿酸传感器[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(1): 20210582.
[7]	赵阳洋, 刘启勇, 陈泊鑫, 赵斌, 周海梅, 李昕欣, 郑丹, 冯飞. 以金属有机骨架材料ZIF-8为固定相的硅基微气相色谱柱[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1736.
[8]	张仁丽, 王瑶, 遇治权, 孙志超, 王安杰, 刘颖雅. 氟改性UiO-66固载钼基过氧化物催化氧化含硫化合物[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1914.
[9]	李梅, 夏晓娟, 陈志雄, 杨梦, 李紫滢, 杨通, 孟爽, 杨云慧, 胡蓉. 基于铂纳米颗粒@金属有机骨架纳米模拟酶的无标记电化学赭曲霉毒素适体传感器的构建[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(12): 3615.
[10]	陈晓, 申博渊, 熊昊, 魏飞. 电子束敏感材料的原子尺度结构研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(1): 133.
[11]	姜笑天, 尹琦, 刘天赋, 曹荣. 金属有机骨架薄膜用于小分子和离子的高效分离[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(8): 1691.
[12]	谢兴钰, 赵雅香, 赵莉芝, 李日舜, 吴迪昊, 叶卉, 辛清萍, 李泓, 张玉忠. 基于金属卟啉2DMOFs仿酶催化的过氧化氢比色法检测[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(8): 1776.
[13]	高霞,潘会宾,乔成芳,陈凤英,周元,杨文华. 基于多级孔金属有机骨架构筑HRP固定化酶反应器及其染料降解应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(7): 1591.
[14]	王瑞, 黄新松, 刘天赋, 曹荣. 金属有机框架用于一氧化碳氧化[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(10): 2174.
[15]	侯俊英, 郝建军, 王雅雅, 刘敬春. Cu₃(BTC)₂金属有机骨架复合基质膜的制备及流体催化性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(9): 1926.