硅基稀土掺杂团簇MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)结构预测与光电子能谱研究

doi:10.7503/cjcu20180218

高等学校化学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1976-1984.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20180218

硅基稀土掺杂团簇MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)结构预测与光电子能谱研究

蒋贤明, 王怀谦(), 曹宇, 孙之惠, 曹玉芳, 吴伟宾

华侨大学工学院, 泉州 362021

收稿日期:2018-03-19 出版日期:2018-07-30 发布日期:2018-07-30
作者简介:
联系人简介: 王怀谦, 男, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事纳米团簇与光电子能谱研究. E-mail: hqwang@hqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金(批准号: 2017J01001)、福建省高校新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(批准号: 2014FJ-NCET-ZR07)、福建省高校杰出青年科研人才培育计划项目(批准号: JA13009)和国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(批准号: 201710385024)资助.

Structure Prediction and Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Rare Earth-doped Silicon-based Clusters of MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)^†

JIANG Xianming, WANG Huaiqian^*(), CAO Yu, SUN Zhihui, CAO Yufang, WU Weibin

College of Engineering, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China

Received:2018-03-19 Online:2018-07-30 Published:2018-07-30
Contact: WANG Huaiqian E-mail:hqwang@hqu.edu.cn
Supported by:
† Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China(No.2017J01001), the New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University, China(No.2014FJ-NCET-ZR07), the Excellent Youth Talents in Fujian Province University, China(No.JA13009) and the National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, China(No.201710385024)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用随机踢球模型结合密度泛函理论, 在PBEPBE/RE/SDD/Si/6-311+G(d)水平下研究了中性和阴性的硅基稀土掺杂团簇MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)的几何结构、稳定性及电子和磁学性质. 计算结果表明, 阴性团簇的基态结构是在五角双锥的双锥侧面外法向方向加入一个Si原子而形成的3D结构, 并且稀土原子M处于五角双锥的顶点; 中性团簇的最低能结构是一个畸变的双帽八面体, 并且M原子处于八面体的赤道面上. SmS $i 7 -$ 团簇在这3种稀土掺杂的团簇中具有最高的平均结合能和掺杂能, 是这3种稀土掺杂团簇中最稳定的一种. Si₇团簇是非磁性团簇, 但是当M原子(M=Eu, Sm, Yb) 掺入其中时, 由于镧系元素独特的原子磁性, 使其变成了磁性团簇. 此外, 还模拟了各团簇前几种低能异构体的光电子能谱.

关键词: 原子团簇, 密度泛函理论, 结构优化, 磁性

Abstract:

The geometrical structures, relative stabilities, electronic properties and magnetism of anionic and neutral lanthanide metal-doped silicon clusters were systematically investigated by using the Saunders Kick global stochastic search technique combined with density functional theory(DFT) calculations at the PBEPBE/RE/SDD/Si/6-311+G(d) level of theory. The calculation results show that the ground state structure for anionic cluster is a 3D structure with the RE atom M sitting on top(or bottom) of the pentagonal bipyramid while adding another Si to the normal direction of it. The lowest energy structure of the neutral cluster is formed by substituting a Si atom on the equatorial surface of a distorted bicapped octahedral with an M atom. The SmS $i 7 -$ cluster has the highest binding energy and doping energy in the three rare earth doped clusters, indicating that SmS $i 7 -$ is the most stable cluster among them. When M atoms(M=Eu, Sm, Yb) were added into the Si₇ cluster, due to their unique atomic magnetism, the non-magnetic Si₇ cluster would be magnetized. In addition, the simulated photoelectron spectra(PES) of top-several isomers of each cluster were also presented, which could provide a theoretical basis for further experiments.

Key words: Atomic cluster, Density functional theory, Structural optimization, Magnetic property

中图分类号:

O641

蒋贤明, 王怀谦, 曹宇, 孙之惠, 曹玉芳, 吴伟宾. 硅基稀土掺杂团簇MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)结构预测与光电子能谱研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(9): 1976-1984.

JIANG Xianming,WANG Huaiqian,CAO Yu,SUN Zhihui,CAO Yufang,WU Weibin. Structure Prediction and Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Rare Earth-doped Silicon-based Clusters of MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)^†[J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2018, 39(9): 1976-1984.

图/表 7

Table 1 Symmetry type(Sym), spin multiplicity(SM), binding energy(Eb) per atom, doping energy(Ed) per atom and HOMO-LUMO energy gap(Egap) of the lowest-energy structures of both pure Sinq(n=7,8; q=0, -1) clusters and RE-doped MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) clusters

Cluster	Isomer	SM	Sym	E_b/eV	E_d/eV	E_gap/eV
Si₇	Ⅰ	1	D₅_h	3.56	—	2.16
S $i 7 -$	Ⅰ	2	D₅_h	3.65	—	0.59
Si₈	Ⅴ	1	C₂_v	3.45	—	1.11
S $i 8 -$	Ⅴ	2	T_d	3.64	—	0.46
EuSi₇	c	8	C₁	3.32	1.65	1.13
EuS $i 7 -$	a	9	C_s	3.51	2.51	0.25
SmSi₇	c	7	C₁	3.36	1.97	0.40
SmS $i 7 -$	a	6	C_s	3.56	2.94	0.30
YbSi₇	c	1	C₁	3.20	2.25	0.90
YbS $i 7 -$	a	2	C_s	3.47	2.20	0.36

Cluster	Isomer	SM	Sym	E_b/eV	E_d/eV	E_gap/eV
Si₇	Ⅰ	1	D₅_h	3.56	—	2.16
S $i 7 -$	Ⅰ	2	D₅_h	3.65	—	0.59
Si₈	Ⅴ	1	C₂_v	3.45	—	1.11
S $i 8 -$	Ⅴ	2	T_d	3.64	—	0.46
EuSi₇	c	8	C₁	3.32	1.65	1.13
EuS $i 7 -$	a	9	C_s	3.51	2.51	0.25
SmSi₇	c	7	C₁	3.36	1.97	0.40
SmS $i 7 -$	a	6	C_s	3.56	2.94	0.30
YbSi₇	c	1	C₁	3.20	2.25	0.90
YbS $i 7 -$	a	2	C_s	3.47	2.20	0.36

Table 2 Experimentally measured adiabatic and vertical detachment energies(ADEs and VDEs) from the photoelectron spectra compared to the calculated ground state or low-lying anion state ADEs and VDEs of RE-doped MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) clusters

Cluster	Isomer	Calculated		Experimental^[37]
Cluster	Isomer	ADE	VDE	ADE	VDE
$EuS i 7 -$	a	1.62	1.98	1.69±0.1	1.88
	b	1.62	2.01
	c	1.20	1.57
	d	1.41	1.96
SmS $i 7 -$	a	1.64	1.97	1.66±0.1	1.88
	b	1.60	1.95
	d	1.72	2.03
	c	1.21	1.69
YbS $i 7 -$	a	1.75	1.98	1.88±0.1	2.03
	c	1.45	1.95
	d	1.65	2.01
	b	1.80	2.07
	e	1.89	2.25
	f	2.03	2.26

Cluster	Isomer	Calculated		Experimental^[37]
Cluster	Isomer	ADE	VDE	ADE	VDE
$EuS i 7 -$	a	1.62	1.98	1.69±0.1	1.88
	b	1.62	2.01
	c	1.20	1.57
	d	1.41	1.96
SmS $i 7 -$	a	1.64	1.97	1.66±0.1	1.88
	b	1.60	1.95
	d	1.72	2.03
	c	1.21	1.69
YbS $i 7 -$	a	1.75	1.98	1.88±0.1	2.03
	c	1.45	1.95
	d	1.65	2.01
	b	1.80	2.07
	e	1.89	2.25
	f	2.03	2.26

Table 3 Relative energies for selected low-lying isomers of MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) with different density functional methods

Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV			Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV
Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91	Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91
EuSi₇	c	C₁	0	0	0	EuS $i 7 -$	a	C_s	0	0.14	0
	d	C_s	0.33	0.28	0.32		b	C_s	0.05	0	0.01
	a	C_s	0.36	0.42	0.37		c	C₁	0.06	0.02	0.03
	b	C_s	0.41	0.31	0.38		d	C_s	0.12	0.24	0.10
	g	C_s	0.65	0.94	0.64		e	C₂_v	0.30	0.41	0.29
	f	C₃_v	0.74	0.61	0.70		f	C₃_v	0.32	0.46	0.28
	e	C₂_v	0.78	0.87	0.78		g	C_s	0.44	0.59	0.42
	h	C_s	1.44	1.00	1.03		h	C_s	0.46	0.44	0.42
	k	C_s	1.45	1.34	1.39		i	C_s	1.07	1.19	1.05
Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV			Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV
Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91	Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91
	i	C_s	1.90	0.82	1.87		j	C_s	1.15	0.96	1.07
	j	C_s	1.93	1.69	1.86		k	C_s	1.24	1.20	1.16
	l	C_s	2.39	2.07	2.28		l	C_s	2.20	1.67	1.98
SmSi₇	c	C₁	0	0	0	SmS $i 7 -$	a	C_s	0	0.09	0
	a	C_s	0.28	0.30	0.23		b	C_s	0.10	0.81	0.01
	d	C_s	0.28	0.27	0.20		d	C_s	0.15	0.08	0.14
	b	C_s	0.34	0.23	0.15		c	C₁	0.27	0	0.25
	g	C_s	0.61	0.52	0.40		g	C_s	0.40	0.41	0.39
	f	C₃_v	0.64	0.49	0.66		f	C₃_v	0.49	0.27	0.40
	j	C_s	0.68	1.66	1.30		e	C₂_v	1.14	1.07	1.09
	e	C₂_v	0.77	0.89	0.85		k	C_s	1.31	1.53	1.61
	k	C_s	1.50	1.85	1.92		h	C_s	1.40	1.25	1.34
	i	C₃_v	1.71	1.77	1.83		j	C_s	1.75	1.88	1.67
	h	C_s	2.38	1.93	1.67		i	C₃_v	1.77	1.68	1.72
	l	C_s	2.61	2.55	2.34		l	C_s	1.81	1.34	1.78
YbSi₇	c	C₁	0	0	0	YbS $i 7 -$	a	C_s	0	0.13	0
	d	C_s	0.22	0.03	0.02		c	C_s	0.02	0.06	0
	a	C_s	0.29	0.09	0.10		d	C_s	0.04	0.14	0.03
	b	C_s	0.40	0.21	0.18		b	C_s	0.07	0	0.02
	g	C_s	0.66	0.46	0.45		e	C₂_v	0.29	0.39	0.27
	e	C₂_v	0.71	0.51	0.51		f	C₃_v	0.29	0.16	0.24
	f	C₃_v	0.85	0.66	0.61		i	C₂_v	0.31	0.50	0.30
	i	C₂_v	0.96	0.76	0.76		h	C_s	0.41	0.37	0.36
	h	C_s	0.99	0.79	0.76		g	C_s	0.43	0.56	0.41
	k	C_s	1.53	1.33	1.27		j	C_s	1.13	0.90	1.04
	j	C_s	1.90	1.70	1.64		k	C_s	1.25	1.19	1.18
	l	C_s	2.40	2.24	2.19		l	C_s	1.66	1.26	1.31

Table 3 Relative energies for selected low-lying isomers of MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) with different density functional methods

Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV			Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV
Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91	Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91
EuSi₇	c	C₁	0	0	0	EuS $i 7 -$	a	C_s	0	0.14	0
	d	C_s	0.33	0.28	0.32		b	C_s	0.05	0	0.01
	a	C_s	0.36	0.42	0.37		c	C₁	0.06	0.02	0.03
	b	C_s	0.41	0.31	0.38		d	C_s	0.12	0.24	0.10
	g	C_s	0.65	0.94	0.64		e	C₂_v	0.30	0.41	0.29
	f	C₃_v	0.74	0.61	0.70		f	C₃_v	0.32	0.46	0.28
	e	C₂_v	0.78	0.87	0.78		g	C_s	0.44	0.59	0.42
	h	C_s	1.44	1.00	1.03		h	C_s	0.46	0.44	0.42
	k	C_s	1.45	1.34	1.39		i	C_s	1.07	1.19	1.05
Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV			Cluster	Isomer	Sym	ΔE/eV
Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91	Cluster	Isomer	Sym	PBEPBE	B3LYP	BPW91
	i	C_s	1.90	0.82	1.87		j	C_s	1.15	0.96	1.07
	j	C_s	1.93	1.69	1.86		k	C_s	1.24	1.20	1.16
	l	C_s	2.39	2.07	2.28		l	C_s	2.20	1.67	1.98
SmSi₇	c	C₁	0	0	0	SmS $i 7 -$	a	C_s	0	0.09	0
	a	C_s	0.28	0.30	0.23		b	C_s	0.10	0.81	0.01
	d	C_s	0.28	0.27	0.20		d	C_s	0.15	0.08	0.14
	b	C_s	0.34	0.23	0.15		c	C₁	0.27	0	0.25
	g	C_s	0.61	0.52	0.40		g	C_s	0.40	0.41	0.39
	f	C₃_v	0.64	0.49	0.66		f	C₃_v	0.49	0.27	0.40
	j	C_s	0.68	1.66	1.30		e	C₂_v	1.14	1.07	1.09
	e	C₂_v	0.77	0.89	0.85		k	C_s	1.31	1.53	1.61
	k	C_s	1.50	1.85	1.92		h	C_s	1.40	1.25	1.34
	i	C₃_v	1.71	1.77	1.83		j	C_s	1.75	1.88	1.67
	h	C_s	2.38	1.93	1.67		i	C₃_v	1.77	1.68	1.72
	l	C_s	2.61	2.55	2.34		l	C_s	1.81	1.34	1.78
YbSi₇	c	C₁	0	0	0	YbS $i 7 -$	a	C_s	0	0.13	0
	d	C_s	0.22	0.03	0.02		c	C_s	0.02	0.06	0
	a	C_s	0.29	0.09	0.10		d	C_s	0.04	0.14	0.03
	b	C_s	0.40	0.21	0.18		b	C_s	0.07	0	0.02
	g	C_s	0.66	0.46	0.45		e	C₂_v	0.29	0.39	0.27
	e	C₂_v	0.71	0.51	0.51		f	C₃_v	0.29	0.16	0.24
	f	C₃_v	0.85	0.66	0.61		i	C₂_v	0.31	0.50	0.30
	i	C₂_v	0.96	0.76	0.76		h	C_s	0.41	0.37	0.36
	h	C_s	0.99	0.79	0.76		g	C_s	0.43	0.56	0.41
	k	C_s	1.53	1.33	1.27		j	C_s	1.13	0.90	1.04
	j	C_s	1.90	1.70	1.64		k	C_s	1.25	1.19	1.18
	l	C_s	2.40	2.24	2.19		l	C_s	1.66	1.26	1.31

Fig.1 Structures of the lower-lying isomers for pure Siq7/8(q=0, -1) clusters(Ⅰ—Ⅳ for Siq7; Ⅴ—Ⅹ for Siq8) and RE-doped MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) clusters(a—l) at the PBEPBE/RE/SDD/Si/6-311+G(d) level of theoryThe dark gray spheres stand for silicon atoms and the cyan ones for RE atoms.

Fig.2 Relative energies and simulated photoelectron spectra for the lowest-lying isomers of MSi7-[M=Eu(A1—A4), Sm(B1—B4), Yb(C1—C4)] clusters (A1), (B1), (C1) Isomer a; (A2), (B2), (C4) isomer b; (A3), (B4), (C2) isomer c; (A4), (B3), (C3) isomer d.

Table 4 Population of the natural charges and the electronic state of the lowest-energy RE-doped MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) clusters

Cluster	Isomer	State	RE	Si-1	Si-2	Si-3	Si-4	Si-5	Si-6	Si-7
EuSi₇	c	⁸A	0.96	-0.05	-0.24	-0.46	0.08	0.03	-0.26	-0.05
$EuS i 7 -$	a	⁹A	0.44	0.03	-0.37	-0.17	-0.30	-0.17	-0.30	-0.16
SmSi₇	c	⁷A	0.95	-0.05	-0.24	-0.45	0.08	0.03	-0.26	-0.06
SmS $i 7 -$	a	⁶A	0.38	0.03	-0.34	-0.19	-0.28	-0.20	-0.28	-0.12
YbSi₇	c	¹A	0.88	-0.04	-0.24	-0.46	0.11	0.04	-0.23	-0.06
YbS $i 7 -$	a	²A"	0.37	0.04	-0.28	-0.38	-0.17	-0.13	-0.17	-0.28

Table 4 Population of the natural charges and the electronic state of the lowest-energy RE-doped MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) clusters

Cluster	Isomer	State	RE	Si-1	Si-2	Si-3	Si-4	Si-5	Si-6	Si-7
EuSi₇	c	⁸A	0.96	-0.05	-0.24	-0.46	0.08	0.03	-0.26	-0.05
$EuS i 7 -$	a	⁹A	0.44	0.03	-0.37	-0.17	-0.30	-0.17	-0.30	-0.16
SmSi₇	c	⁷A	0.95	-0.05	-0.24	-0.45	0.08	0.03	-0.26	-0.06
SmS $i 7 -$	a	⁶A	0.38	0.03	-0.34	-0.19	-0.28	-0.20	-0.28	-0.12
YbSi₇	c	¹A	0.88	-0.04	-0.24	-0.46	0.11	0.04	-0.23	-0.06
YbS $i 7 -$	a	²A"	0.37	0.04	-0.28	-0.38	-0.17	-0.13	-0.17	-0.28

Table 5 Natural electron configuration, charge, magnetic moment of 6s, 4f, 5d, 6p and 6d states of M atom with M = Eu, Sm, Yb, along with total magnetic moment of the ground state structure of MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1) clusters

Cluster	Valence electron configuration	RE Moment/μ_B							Molecule/μ_B
Cluster	Valence electron configuration	Charge/e	6s	4f	5d	6p	6d	Total	Molecule/μ_B
EuSi₇	6s^0.394f^6.975d^0.606p^0.096d^0.01	0.96	0.04	6.95	0.08	0.01	0.01	7.09	7
EuS $i 7 -$	6s^0.474f^6.925d^1.026p^0.196d^0.01	0.44	0.05	6.90	0.28	0.02	0	7.25	8
SmSi₇	6s^0.384f^5.965d^0.656p^0.096d^0.01	0.95	0.03	5.94	0.08	0	0.01	6.06	6
SmS $i 7 -$	6s^0.484f^5.785d^1.206p^0.196d^0.01	0.38	0.03	5.74	-0.02	0	0	5.75	5
YbSi₇	6s^0.554f^13.945d^0.486p^0.156d^0.01	0.88	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
YbS $i 7 -$	6s^0.604f^13.855d^0.886p^0.316d^0.02	0.37	0	0.08	0.12	0.01	0	0.21	1

Cluster	Valence electron configuration	RE Moment/μ_B							Molecule/μ_B
Cluster	Valence electron configuration	Charge/e	6s	4f	5d	6p	6d	Total	Molecule/μ_B
EuSi₇	6s^0.394f^6.975d^0.606p^0.096d^0.01	0.96	0.04	6.95	0.08	0.01	0.01	7.09	7
EuS $i 7 -$	6s^0.474f^6.925d^1.026p^0.196d^0.01	0.44	0.05	6.90	0.28	0.02	0	7.25	8
SmSi₇	6s^0.384f^5.965d^0.656p^0.096d^0.01	0.95	0.03	5.94	0.08	0	0.01	6.06	6
SmS $i 7 -$	6s^0.484f^5.785d^1.206p^0.196d^0.01	0.38	0.03	5.74	-0.02	0	0	5.75	5
YbSi₇	6s^0.554f^13.945d^0.486p^0.156d^0.01	0.88	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
YbS $i 7 -$	6s^0.604f^13.855d^0.886p^0.316d^0.02	0.37	0	0.08	0.12	0.01	0	0.21	1

参考文献 46

[1]	Jing Q., Ge G. X., Cao H. B., Huang X. C., Liu X. Y., Yan H. X., Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2010, 26(9), 2510—2514
	(井群, 葛桂贤, 曹海宾, 黄旭初, 刘效勇, 闫红霞. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(9), 2510—2514)
[2]	Chen L., Xu C., Zhang X. F., Acta Phys. Sin., 2009, 58(3), 1603—1607
	(陈亮, 徐灿, 张小芳. 物理学报, 2009, 58(3), 1603—1607)
[3]	Lu Z. H., Cao J. X., Chin. Phys. B, 2008, 17(9), 3336—3342
[4]	Zhang C. R., Chen Y. H., Wang D. B., Wu Y. Z., Chen H. S., Chin. Phys. B, 2008, 17(8), 2938—2950
[5]	Tekin A., Hartke B., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys ., 2004, 6, 503—509
[6]	Wales D. J., Waterworth M. C., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1992, 88(23), 3409—3417
[7]	Lyon J. T., Gruene P., Fielicke A., Meijer G., Janssens E., Claes P., Lievens P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 1115—1121
[8]	Hiura H., Miyazaki T., Kanayama T., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, 86, 1733—1736
[9]	Kumar V., Comput. Mater. Sci., 2006, 36, 1—11
[10]	Koyasu K., Atobe J., Furuse S., Nakajima A., J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 129, 214301
[11]	Kumar V., Kawazoe Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, 87, 045503
[12]	Kumar V., Eur. Phys. J. D, 2003, 24, 227—232
[13]	Kumar V., Comput. Mater. Sci., 2004, 30, 260—268
[14]	Beck S. M., J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 90, 6306—6312
[15]	Ohara M., Koyasu K., Nakajima A., Kaya K., Chem. Phys. Lett., 2003, 371, 490—497
[16]	Ohara M., Miyajima K., Pramann A., Nakajima A., Kaya K., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106, 3702—3705
[17]	Manzoor D., Krishnamurty S., Pal S., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 7501—7507
[18]	Kumar V., Briere T., Kawazoe Y., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2003, 68, 1—9
[19]	Hang T. D., Nguyen H. T., Nguyen M. T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 10442—10451
[20]	Wang H. Q., Li H. F., RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 29782—29793
[21]	Wang J., Zhao J., Ma L., Wang B., Wang G., Phys. Lett. A, 2007, 367, 335—344
[22]	Guo L., Zhao G., Gu Y., Liu X., Zeng Z., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2008, 77, 2—9
[23]	Li J., Wang G., Yao C., Mu Y., Wan J., Han M., J. Chem. Phys., 2009, 130, 164514
[24]	Khanna S. N., Rao B. K., Jena P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89, 016803
[25]	Hang T. D., Hung H. M., Nguyen M. T., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 31054—31063
[26]	Frisch M. J., Trucks G. W., Schlegel H. B., Scuseria G. E., Robb M. A., Cheeseman J. R., Montgomery J. A. Jr., Vreven T., Kudin K. N., Burant J. C., Millam J. M., Iyengar S. S., Tomasi J., Barone V., Mennucci B., Cossi M., Scalmani G., Rega N., Petersson G. A., Nakatsuji H., Hada M., Ehara M., Toyota K., Fukuda R., Hasegawa J., Ishida M., Nakajima T., Honda Y., Kitao O., Nakai H., Klene M., Li X., Knox J. E., Hratchian H. P., Cross J. B., Bakken V., Adamo C., Jaramillo J., Gomperts R., Stratmann R. E., Yazyev O., Austin A. J., Cammi R., Pomelli C., Ochterski J. W., Ayala P. Y., Morokuma K., Voth G. A., Salvador P., Dannenberg J. J., Zakrzewski V. G., Dapprich S., Daniels A. D., Strain M. C., Farkas O., Malick D. K., Rabuck A. D., Raghavachari K., Foresman J. B., Ortiz J. V., Cui Q., Baboul A. G., Clifford S., Cioslowski J., Stefanov B., Liu G., Liashenko A., Piskorz P., Komaromi I., Martin R. L., Fox D. J., Keith T., Al-Laham M. A., Peng C. Y., Nanayakkara A., Challacombe M., Gill P. M. W., Johnson B., Chen W., Wong M. W., Gonzalez C., Pople J. A., Gaussian 09, Revision C. 01, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT, 2010
[27]	Bera P. P., Sattelmeyer K. W., Saunders M., Schaefer III H. F., Schleyer P. R., J. Chem. A, 2006, 110(13), 4287—4290
[28]	Wang H. Q., Li H. F., Kuang X. Y., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 5272—2583
[29]	Wang H. Q., Li H. F., J. Chem. Phys., 2012, 137, 164304
[30]	Wang H. Q., Li H. F., Chem. Phys. Lett., 2012, 554, 231—235
[31]	Wang H. Q., Li H. F., Wang J. X., Kuang X. Y., J. Mol. Model., 2012, 18, 2993—3001
[32]	Li H. F., Wang H. Q., R. Soc. Open Sci., 2018, 5, 171019
[33]	Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865—3868
[34]	Cao X., Dolg M., J. Mol. Struct.: Theochem., 2002, 581, 139—147
[35]	Dolg M., Stoll H., Preuss H., J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 90, 1730—1734
[36]	Paduani C., Jena P., J. Nano Res., 2012, 14, 1035
[37]	Grubisic A., Yeon J. K., Wang H., Bowen K. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 10783—10790
[38]	Tozer D. J., Handy N. C., J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 109, 10180—10189
[39]	Bai H., Zhai H. J., Li S. D., Wang L. S., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 9646—9653
[40]	Li W. L., Romanescu C., Piazza Z. A., Wang L. S., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 13663—13669
[41]	Galeev T. R., Ivanov A. S., Romanescu C., Li W. L., Bozhenko K. V., Wang L. S., Boldyrev A. I., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 8805—8810
[42]	Zhai H. J., Chen W. J., Huang X., Wang L. S., RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 2707—2712
[43]	Liu H. T., Wang Y. L., Xiong X. G., Dau P. D., Piazza Z. A., Huang D. L., Xu C. Q., Li J., Wang L. S., Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 3286—3295
[44]	Pal R., Wang L. M., Huang W., Wang L. S., Zeng X. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3396—3404
[45]	Zhai H. J., Wang B., Huang X., Wang L. S., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2009, 113, 3866—3875
[46]	Zhai H. J., Averkiev B. B., Yu D., Wang L. S., Boldyrev A. I., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4277—4280

硅基稀土掺杂团簇MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)结构预测与光电子能谱研究

Structure Prediction and Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Rare Earth-doped Silicon-based Clusters of MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	史海涵,吴香萍,彭辛哲,余国静,董朝阳,纪瑶瑶,杨思文,陈俊林,王锦,冉雪芹,杨磊,解令海,黄维. 一种基于风车格结构的有效降低内重组能的咔唑类格子化分子[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(7): 1670-1676.
[2]	张作然, 张利, 张志凌. 基于侧向磁泳的微流控芯片对两种磁性纳米球的同时分选[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(6): 1243-1251.
[3]	贺进禄, 龙闰, 方维海. 非绝热分子动力学模拟A位阳离子对钙钛矿热载流子弛豫的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(3): 439-446.
[4]	曹洪玉,马子辉,张文琼,唐乾,李如玉,郑学仿. 单、双及双混氮杂卟啉的结构和电子吸收光谱[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(2): 341-348.
[5]	张林, 张尉, 岳鑫, 李鹏杰, 杨作银, 蒲敏, 雷鸣. 锰配合物催化CO₂加氢生成甲酸的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(9): 1911-1917.
[6]	魏馨, 邓要亮, 郑旭明, 赵彦英. 2-氨基苯并噻唑的结构及激发态质子转移动力学[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(8): 1679-1685.
[7]	王晓慧, 王可心, 刘俊平, 洪霞. 介孔结构增强的Fe₃O₄超粒子@介孔SiO₂的光热性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(8): 1586-1592.
[8]	李泽, 王建江, 高海涛, 赵芳. 多孔羰基铁/CoFe₂O₄/聚苯胺复合材料的制备及吸波机理[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(8): 1784-1792.
[9]	吴姗姗, 魏缠玲, 赵丽娟, 田央, 王霞, 龚波林. 新型磁性限进分子印迹复合材料的制备及富集性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(6): 1150-1157.
[10]	曹培明, 尤静林, 周灿栋, LU Liming, 王建, 王敏, 丁雅妮, 徐琰东. CaF₂-Al₂O₃-MgO电渣微结构的原位拉曼光谱及²⁷Al魔角旋转核磁共振研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(6): 1242-1248.
[11]	程文敏, 夏文生, 万惠霖. 氧化镧表面反应性对甲烷和氧分子活化的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(5): 940-949.
[12]	康慧敏, 王洪强, 王慧莹, 吴黎歆, 仇永清. 卟啉-碳硼烷-硼亚甲基二吡咯三元化合物二阶非线性光学性质的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(5): 965-972.
[13]	郅莎莎, 班颖, 徐志广, 许旋. 金属串配合物[MM'M″(dpa)₄(Cl)₂](M=Co, Ni; M',M″=Co, Rh)电子输运的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(5): 980-987.
[14]	刘秋娜, 许文文, 刘茂祝, 王惠钢, 郑旭明. 高分辨偏正拉曼光谱对丙酸酐C=O振动模的拉曼光谱非一致效应研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(5): 932-939.
[15]	张晓英, 杜桂芳, 朱博, 关威. 镍催化氮杂环丁酮和丁二烯环加成反应机制的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(4): 770-776.

硅基稀土掺杂团簇MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)结构预测与光电子能谱研究

Structure Prediction and Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Rare Earth-doped Silicon-based Clusters of MSiq7(M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

硅基稀土掺杂团簇MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)结构预测与光电子能谱研究

Structure Prediction and Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Rare Earth-doped Silicon-based Clusters of MS $i q 7$ (M=Eu, Sm, Yb; q=0, -1)^†