Mechanistic Studies on CH3CH2O+HCHO Reaction and Rate Constants of Major Channel†

doi:10.7503/cjcu20131237

Abstract

Abstract:

The mechanism of the reaction between CH₃CH₂O and HCHO was investigated at CCSD(T)cc-pVDZ//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. Eight possible reaction channels(five H-abstraction channels and three H-isomerization channels) for the title reaction were idenpngied. The results indicated that channel R→IMa(CH₃CH₂O…CH₂O)→TS1→IM1b→P1(CH₃CH₂OH+CHO) was the most favorable channel with the apparent activation energy of 14.65 kJ/mol. The rate constants of the path R1 were evaluated over a temperature range of 275—1000 K via the canonical variational transition state theory(CVT) combined with a small-curvature tunneling correction. The fitted three-parameter expression for the path R1 is k^CVT/SCT=2.26×10^-17T^0.57exp(-1004/T) and R1 has a positive temperature effect over a temperature range of 275—1000 K.

Key words: CH3CH2O, HCHO, Density functional theory, Reaction mechanism, Rate constant

CLC Number:

O643.1

TrendMD:

GUO Sha, WANG Weina, JIN Lingxia, WANG Shuai, WANG Wenliang. Mechanistic Studies on CH₃CH₂O+HCHO Reaction and Rate Constants of Major Channel^†[J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2014, 35(6): 1300.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1 Optimized geometries of the reactants and products of the hydrogen abstraction, at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level Bond lengths(nm) and bond angles(°), the data in the parentheses are experimental values.

Fig.2 Optimized geometries of intermediates, transition states and the products of the hydrogen migration isomerization at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level[bond lengths(nm)]

Fig.3 Potential energy profile for the CH3CH2O+HCHO reaction at the CCSD(T)cc-pVDZ//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level

Table 1 Reaction enthalpy(ΔrH298 K0—) for the title reaction, and formation enthalpies (ΔfH(g, M, 298 K)0—) for some species

Species	Δ_r $H 298 K 0 — a$ /(kJ·mol^-1)	Species	Δ_r $H 298 K 0 — a$ /(kJ·mol^-1)	Species	Δ_f $H (g, M, 298 K) 0 — b$ /(kJ·mol^-1)
R1	-57.78(-70.50±10.00)	R5	103.5(90.67±7.23)	CH₃CH₂OCH₂O	-109.9±4.00
R2	-34.40	R6	-41.48	CH₃CH₂OCHOH	-163.8±4.10
R3	-23.89(-27.40±8.10)	R7	-20.48	CH₃CHOCH₂OH	-142.8±4.00
R4	92.95	R8	-112.1	CH₂CH₂OCH₂OH	-234.4±5.00

Table 1 Reaction enthalpy(ΔrH298 K0—) for the title reaction, and formation enthalpies (ΔfH(g, M, 298 K)0—) for some species

Species	Δ_r $H 298 K 0 — a$ /(kJ·mol^-1)	Species	Δ_r $H 298 K 0 — a$ /(kJ·mol^-1)	Species	Δ_f $H (g, M, 298 K) 0 — b$ /(kJ·mol^-1)
R1	-57.78(-70.50±10.00)	R5	103.5(90.67±7.23)	CH₃CH₂OCH₂O	-109.9±4.00
R2	-34.40	R6	-41.48	CH₃CH₂OCHOH	-163.8±4.10
R3	-23.89(-27.40±8.10)	R7	-20.48	CH₃CHOCH₂OH	-142.8±4.00
R4	92.95	R8	-112.1	CH₂CH₂OCH₂OH	-234.4±5.00

Scheme 1 Eight pathways for the reactions of CH3CH2O with HCHO

Fig.4 Variation of the bond distances as a function of s at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level for the major reaction channel of CH3CH2O+HCHO(R1)

Table 2 Calculated rate constants kTST, kCVT and kCVT/SCT(cm3·molecule-1·s-1) for major channel R1 in 275—1000 K

T/K	k^TST	k^CVT	k^CVT/SCT	T/K	k^TST	k^CVT	k^CVT/SCT
275	7.41×10^-20	1.91×10^-20	1.43×10^-17	500	3.19×10^-17	4.15×10^-18	1.06×10^-16
298	2.06×10^-19	4.86×10^-20	2.02×10^-17	550	6.54×10^-17	7.56×10^-18	1.34×10^-16
325	5.66×10^-19	1.21×10^-19	2.84×10^-17	600	1.21×10^-16	1.25×10^-17	1.64×10^-16
350	1.27×10^-18	2.50×10^-19	3.73×10^-17	650	2.04×10^-16	1.92×10^-17	1.94×10^-16
375	2.57×10^-18	4.67×10^-19	4.70×10^-17	700	3.25×10^-16	2.79×10^-17	2.26×10^-16
400	4.78×10^-18	8.07×10^-19	5.76×10^-17	750	4.92×10^-16	3.87×10^-17	2.59×10^-16
425	8.3×10^-18	1.31×10^-18	6.90×10^-17	800	7.17×10^-16	5.17×10^-17	2.94×10^-16
475	2.12×10^-17	2.93×10^-18	9.34×10^-17	1000	2.36×10^-15	1.29×10^-16	4.49×10^-16

Fig.5 Fitted Arrhenius plots of the rate constant versus the reciprocal of temperature over the range of 275—1000 K for major channel R1

References 25

[1]	Salthammer T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52(12), 3320—3327
[2]	Atkinson R., Baulch D. L., Cox R. A., Crowley J. N., Hampson R. F., Hynes R. G., Jenkin M. E., Rossi M. J., Troe J., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2004, 4(6), 1461—1738
[3]	Gomez A. L., Lewis T. L., Wilkinson S. A., Nizkorodov S. A., Environ. Sci. Technol., 2008, 42(10), 3582—3587
[4]	Huang S., Shao M., Lu S. H., Liu Y., Chin. Chem. Lett., 2008, 19(5), 573—5769
[5]	Im U., Tayanc M., Yenigun O., Atmos. Res., 2008, 89(4), 382—390
[6]	Wallington T. J., Hurley M. D., Fracheboud J. M., Orlando J. J., Tyndall G. S., Sehested J., Mogelberg T. E., Nielsen O. J., J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100(46), 18116—18122
[7]	Zhu R. S., Diau E. G. W., Lin M. C., Mebel A. M., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105(50), 11249—11259
[8]	Clemitshaw K. C., Williams J., Rattigan O. V., Shallcross D. E., Law K. S., Anthony Cox R., J. Geophys. Res., 1997, 102(2), 117—126
[9]	Leplat N., Dagaut P., Togbe C., Vandooren J., Combust. Flame, 2011, 158(4), 705—725
[10]	Beukes J. A., Anna B. D., Bakken V., Nielsen C. J., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2(18), 4049—4060
[11]	Bras G. L., Foon R., Combourieu J., Chem. Phys. Lett., 1980, 73(2), 357—361
[12]	Eiteneer B., Yu C. L., Goldenberg M., Frenklach M., J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102(27), 5196—5205
[13]	Frost M. J., Smith I. W. M., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday. Trans., 1990, 86(10), 1751—1756
[14]	Frost M. J., Smith I. W. M., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday. Trans., 1990, 86(10), 1757—1762
[15]	Daele V., Vassalli L., Poulet G., Bras G. L., Int. J. Chem. Kine., 1995, 27(11), 1121—1133
[16]	Setokuchi O., Sato M., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106(35), 8124—8132
[17]	Henon E., Bohr F., Chem. Phys. Lett., 2001, 342(5/6), 659—666
[18]	Frisch M.J., Trucks G. W., Schlegel H. B., Scuseria G. E., Robb M. A., Cheeseman J. R., Vreven T., Kudin K. N., Burant J. C., Millam J. M., Iyengar S. S., Tomasi J., Barone V., Mennucci B., Cossi M., Scalmani G., Rega N., Petersson G. A., Nakatsuji H., Hada M., Ehara M., Toyota K., Fukuda R., Hasegawa J., Ishida M., Nakajima T., Honda Y., Kitao O., Nakai H., Klene M., Li X., Knox J. E., Hratchian H. P., Cross J. B., Adamo C., Jaramillo J., Gomperts R., Stratmann R. E., Yazyev O., Austin A. J., Cammi R., Pomelli C., Ochterski J. W., Ayala P. Y., Morokuma K., Voth G. A., Salvador P., Dannenberg J. J., Zakrzewski V. G., Dapprich S., Daniels A. D., Strain M. C., Farkas O., Malick D. K., Rabuck A. D., Raghavachari K., Foresman J. B., Ortiz J. V., Cui Q., Baboul A. G., Clifford S., Cioslowski J., Stefanov B. B., Liu G., Liashenko A., Piskorz P., Komaromi I., Martin R. L., Fox D. J., Keith T., Al-Laham M. A., Peng C. Y., Nanayakkara A., Challacombe M., Gill P. M. W., Johnson B., Chen W., Wong M. W., Gonzalez C., Pople J. A., Gaussian 03, Revision C.02, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004
[19]	Anglada J. M., Domingo V. M., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2005, 109(47), 10786—10794
[20]	Zhang S.W., Truong T. N., VKLab, Version 1.0, University of Utah: Salt Lake City, 2001
[21]	Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database,
[22]	Lee T. J., Taylor P. R., J. Quantum Chem. Symp., 1989, 36(23), 199—207
[23]	Rienstra-Kiracofe J. C., Allen W. D., Schaefer H. F., J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104(44), 9823—9840
[24]	Gurvich L. V., Veyts I. V., Alcock C. B., Pure. Appl. Chem., 1989, 61(6), 1027—1031
[25]	Ruscic B., Boggs J. E., Burcat A., Csasza A. G., Demaison J., Janoschek R., Martin J. M. L., Morton M. L., Rossi M. J., Stanton J. F., Szalay P. G., Westmoreland P. R., Zabel F., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 2005, 34(2), 573—655

Mechanistic Studies on CH₃CH₂O+HCHO Reaction and Rate Constants of Major Channel^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HE Hongrui, XIA Wensheng, ZHANG Qinghong, WAN Huilin. Density-functional Theoretical Study on the Interaction of Indium Oxyhydroxide Clusters with Carbon Dioxide and Methane [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(8): 20220196.
[2]	ZHOU Zixuan, YANG Haiyan, SUN Yuhan, GAO Peng. Recent Progress in Heterogeneous Catalysts for the Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(7): 20220235.
[3]	YANG Dan, LIU Xu, DAI Yihu, ZHU Yan, YANG Yanhui. Research Progress in Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Reaction over Gold Clusters [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(7): 20220198.
[4]	WONG Honho, LU Qiuyang, SUN Mingzi, HUANG Bolong. Rational Design of Graphdiyne-based Atomic Electrocatalysts： DFT and Self-validated Machine Learning [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(5): 20220042.
[5]	SUN Cuihong, LYU Liqiang, LIU Ying, WANG Yan, YANG Jing, ZHANG Shaowen. Mechanism and Kinetics on the Reaction of Isopropyl Nitrate with Cl， OH and NO₃ Radicals [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(2): 20210591.
[6]	LIU Yang, LI Wangchang, ZHANG Zhuxia, WANG Fang, YANG Wenjing, GUO Zhen, CUI Peng. Theoretical Exploration of Noncovalent Interactions Between Sc₃C₂@C₈₀ and ［12］Cycloparaphenylene Nanoring [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(11): 20220457.
[7]	CHENG Yuanyuan, XI Biying. Theoretical Study on the Fragmentation Mechanism of CH₃SSCH₃ Radical Cation Initiated by OH Radical [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(10): 20220271.
[8]	ZHOU Chengsi, ZHAO Yuanjin, HAN Meichen, YANG Xia, LIU Chenguang, HE Aihua. Regulation of Silanes as External Electron Donors on Propylene/butene Sequential Polymerization [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(10): 20220290.
[9]	WANG Yuanyue, AN Suosuo, ZHENG Xuming, ZHAO Yanying. Spectroscopic and Theoretical Studies on 5-Mercapto-1，3，4-thiadiazole-2-thione Microsolvation Clusters [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(10): 20220354.
[10]	HUANG Luoyi, WENG Yueyue, HUANG Xuhui, WANG Chaojie. Theoretical Study on the Structures and Properties of Flavonoids in Plantain [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(9): 2752.
[11]	MA Lijuan, GAO Shengqi, RONG Yifei, JIA Jianfeng, WU Haishun. Theoretical Investigation of Hydrogen Storage Properties of Sc， Ti， V-decorated and B/N-doped Monovacancy Graphene [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(9): 2842.
[12]	MENG Fanwei, GAO Qi, YE Qing, LI Chenxi. Potassium Poisoning Mechanism of Cu-SAPO-18 Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO_x by Ammonia [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(9): 2832.
[13]	ZHONG Shengguang, XIA Wensheng, ZHANG Qinghong, WAN Huilin. Theoretical Study on Direct Conversion of CH₄ and CO₂ into Acetic Acid over MCu₂O_x（M = Cu²⁺， Ce⁴⁺， Zr⁴⁺） Clusters [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(9): 2878.
[14]	ZHENG Ruoxin, ZHANG Igor Ying, XU Xin. Development and Benchmark of Lower Scaling Doubly Hybrid Density Functional XYG3 [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(7): 2210.
[15]	LIU Changhui, LIANG Guojun, LI Yanlu, CHENG Xiufeng, ZHAO Xian. Density Functional Theory Study of NH₃ Adsorption on Boron Nanotubes [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(7): 2263.