Theoretical Design and Experimental Performance Research on Barbital Imprinting Polymer†

doi:10.7503/cjcu20140393

Abstract

Abstract:

On the basis of the density functional theory of M062X, we performed the interaction processes between the barbital(BAR) and different functional monomers by Gaussian 09 software. The functional monomers are methacrylic acid(MAA), acrylamide(AM), 4-vinylpyridine(4-Vpy), and N,N'-methylenebisa-crylamide(MBAD), respectively. The excellent functional monomer was optimized according to the hydrogen bond and binding energies(ΔE). The calculation results indicated that the number of hydrogen bonds was the largest, the bond length was the shortest, the ΔE was the lowest, and the interaction was the strongest between the MAA and the template molecule when the molar ratio of reaction for BAR-MAA was 1∶6. The molecular imprinted polymer microspheres(MIPs) composed of the BAR and MAA was synthesized by precipitation polymerization. The results showed that the stability and selective adsorption for MAA and BAR were the highest compared with the AM, 4-Vpy and MBAD. The average diameters of BAR-MIPs synthesized in acetonitrile was 190 nm. Analysis of the Scatchard plot revealed that the binding sites of BAR-MIPs to BAR were equal class under the studied concentration range, the dissociation constant(K_d) and apparent maximum adsorption quantity(Q_max) of BAR-MIPs were 63.3 mg/L and 17.5 mg/g, respectively. The thermodynamic study indicated that the adsorption of BAR-MIPs to BAR was an exothermic process, and the adsorption effect was better under the 293 K. The study of selective adsorption showed that BAR-MIPs had higher selectivity for BAR than that for 1,3-dimethyl barbituric acid(DMBA), 2-thiobarbituric acid(TMB), and pelltobarbitalum natricum(PBS). The studies can provide theoretical and experimental bases for the BAR molecular imprinted system, such as the selection of functional monomers, the optimization of reaction ratios, and the prediction of adsorption performance.

Key words: Barbital, Functional monomer, Molecular imprinting polymer, Simulation, Selective adsorption

CLC Number:

O641.3
O631

TrendMD:

SU Tingting, LIU Junbo, TANG Shanshan, JIN Ruifa. Theoretical Design and Experimental Performance Research on Barbital Imprinting Polymer^†[J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2014, 35(10): 2146.

Figures/Tables 14

References 23

[1]	Lian Z. R., Wang J. T., Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2012, 64, 2656—2662
[2]	Zhang Y. Q., Shan X., Gao X. Q., Sep. Purif. Technol., 2011, 76(3), 337—344
[3]	Liang R. N., Kou L. J., Chen Z. P., Qin W., Sensor Actuat. B-Chem., 2013, 188, 972—977
[4]	Marina N., Sandra B., Dragana M. P., Davorka S., Forensic Sci. Int., 2013, 231(1/3), 317—324
[5]	Li W. J., Hu Y. Y., Han F., Xu H. Q., Song W., Lv Y. N., Zheng P., Chem. J. Chinese Universities,2013, 34(5), 1219—1225
	(李文静, 胡艳云, 韩芳, 徐慧群, 宋伟, 吕亚宁, 郑平. 高等学校化学学报, 2013, 34(5), 1219—1225)
[6]	Sun J. N., Liu J. B., Tang S. S., Jin R. F., Chinese J. Struct. Chem., 2013, 32(8), 1204—1210
[7]	Liu J. B., Tang S. S., Sun J. N., Jin R. F., Chem. J. Chinese Universities,2013, 34(11), 2566—2573
	(刘俊渤, 唐珊珊, 孙佳妮, 靳瑞发. 高等学校化学学报, 2013, 34(11), 2566—2573)
[8]	Wang Z.L., Studies on Immunological Rapid Determination of Phenobarbital Residues in Animal Food, Northwest A & F University, Xi’an, 2006
	(王自良. 苯巴比妥残留免疫学快速检测技术研究, 西安, 西北农林科技大学, 2006)
[9]	Zhang H. T., Wang Z. L., Wang Y. R., Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences,2008, 36(4), 29—31
	(张海棠, 王自良, 王艳荣. 山西农业科学, 2008, 36(4), 29—31)
[10]	Deng Q. L., Yan C., Zhang Z. C., Gao R. Y., Wang Q. S., Chinese J. Analys. Lab., 2003, 22, 113—115
	(邓启良, 阎超, 张智超, 高如瑜, 王琴孙. 分析试验室, 2003, 22, 113—115)
[11]	Beltran A., Borrull F., Cormack P. A. G., Marcé R. M., J. Chromatogr. A,2011, 1218(29), 4612—4618
[12]	Dong C. K., Li X., Guo Z. C., Qi J. Y., Anal. Chim. Acta,2009, 647(1), 117—124
[13]	Frisch M.J., Trucks G. W., Schlegel H. B., Scuseria G. E., Robb M. A., Cheeseman J. R., Montgomery J. A., Vreven T., Kudin J. K. N., Burant J. C., Milliam J. M., Iyengar S. S., Tomasi J., Barone V., Mennucci B., Cossi M., Scalmani G., Rega N., Petersson G. A., Nakatsuji H., Hada M., Ehara M., Toyota K., Fakuda R., Hasegawa J., Ishida M., Akajima T., Honda Y., Kitao O., Nakai H., Klene M., Li X., Knox J. E., Hratchian H. P., Cross J. B., Adamo C., Jaramillo J., Gomperts R., Stratmann R. E., Yazyev O., Austin A. J., Cammi R., Pomelli C., Ochterski J. W., Ayala P. Y., Morokuma K., Voth G. A., Salvador P., Dannenberg J. J., Zakrzewski V. G., Dapprich S., Daniels A. D., Strain M. C., Farkas O., Malick D. K., Rabuck A. D., Raghavachari K., Foresman J. B., Ortiz J. V., Cui Q., Baboul A. G., Clifford S., Cioslowski J., Stefanov B. B., Liu G., Liashenko A., Piskorz P., Komaromi I., Martin R. L., Fox D. J., Keith T., Al-Laham M. A., Peng C. Y., Nanayakkara A., Challacombe M., Gill P. M. W., Johnson B., Chen W., Wong M. W., Gonzalez C., Pople J. A.,Gaussian 09, Revision A.2, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2009
[14]	Boys F., Bernardi F., Mol. Phys., 1970, 19, 553
[15]	Zhang Y., Xu X., Prog. Chem., 2012, 24(6), 1023—1037
	(张颖, 徐昕. 化学进展, 2012, 24(6), 1023—1037)
[16]	Su P. F., Tan K., Wu A. A., Lv X., Zhao Y., Cao Z. X., Wu W., Journal of Xiamen University(Natural Science), 2011, 50(2), 311—318
	(苏培峰, 谭凯, 吴安安, 吕鑫, 赵仪, 曹泽星, 吴玮. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 50(2), 311—318)
[17]	Sun T., Wang Y. B., Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 2011, 27(11), 2553—2558
	(孙涛, 王一波. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(11), 2553—2558)
[18]	Maria das Dores M. C. R. S., Manuel A. V. R. S., Vera L. S. F., Maria V. R., Pilar J., Manuel T., Juan Z. D., Pilar C., Rosa M. C., José E., J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2009, 41, 1400—1407
[19]	Bader R. F. W., J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 7314—7323
[20]	Lu T., Chen F. W., J. Comput. Chem., 2012, 33, 580
[21]	Popelier P. L. A., Bader R. F. W., J. Phy. Chem. A,1998, 102, 1873—1878
[22]	Jeffrey G. A., Crystallogr. Rev., 2003, 9(2/3), 135—176
[23]	Steiner T., Crystallogr. Rev., 2003, 9(2/3), 177—228

Species	6-31G(d,p)	6-31++G(d,p)	6-311G(d)	Expt.^[18]
C1—N2/nm	0.1386	0.1385	0.1385	0.1376
N2—C3/nm	0.1385	0.1385	0.1384	0.1376
C3—C4/nm	0.1522	0.1523	0.1521	0.1514
C1—O9/nm	0.1206	0.1208	0.1199	0.1213
C3—O11/nm	0.1209	0.1211	0.1203	0.1213
N2—H8/nm	0.1013	0.1014	0.1012	0.0939
N6—H7/nm	0.1013	0.1014	0.1012	0.0939
C4—C12/nm	0.1544	0.1546	0.1544	0.1541
C12—C22/nm	0.1526	0.1527	0.1526	0.1514
C1—N2—C3/(°)	127.7	127.4	127.8	126.5
N2—C3—C4/(°)	117.4	117.7	117.4	118.3
C3—C4—C5/(°)	115.1	114.7	115.2	115.8
C4—C5—N6/(°)	117.4	117.7	117.4	118.3
C5—N6—C1/(°)	127.7	127.4	127.8	126.4
N6—C1—N2/(°)	114.4	114.7	114.3	114.6
C12—C4—C5/(°)	107.8	107.9	107.8	109.6
C4—C12—C22/(°)	114.3	113.3	113.3	114.8

Species	6-31G(d,p)	6-31++G(d,p)	6-311G(d)	Expt.^[18]
C1—N2/nm	0.1386	0.1385	0.1385	0.1376
N2—C3/nm	0.1385	0.1385	0.1384	0.1376
C3—C4/nm	0.1522	0.1523	0.1521	0.1514
C1—O9/nm	0.1206	0.1208	0.1199	0.1213
C3—O11/nm	0.1209	0.1211	0.1203	0.1213
N2—H8/nm	0.1013	0.1014	0.1012	0.0939
N6—H7/nm	0.1013	0.1014	0.1012	0.0939
C4—C12/nm	0.1544	0.1546	0.1544	0.1541
C12—C22/nm	0.1526	0.1527	0.1526	0.1514
C1—N2—C3/(°)	127.7	127.4	127.8	126.5
N2—C3—C4/(°)	117.4	117.7	117.4	118.3
C3—C4—C5/(°)	115.1	114.7	115.2	115.8
C4—C5—N6/(°)	117.4	117.7	117.4	118.3
C5—N6—C1/(°)	127.7	127.4	127.8	126.4
N6—C1—N2/(°)	114.4	114.7	114.3	114.6
C12—C4—C5/(°)	107.8	107.9	107.8	109.6
C4—C12—C22/(°)	114.3	113.3	113.3	114.8

Complex	Action site	R/nm	ρ(r)	▽²ρ(r)	Complex	Action site	R/nm	ρ(r)	▽²ρ(r)
BAR-MAA(1∶6)	O35…H8—N2	0.1764	0.0371	0.1186	BAR-4-Vpy(1∶3)	C56—H62…O10	0.2325	0.0125	0.0381
	O36—H37…O11	0.1783	0.0340	0.1111	BAR-MBAD	N27—H45…O11	0.1979	0.0224	0.0723
	O47…H7—N6	0.1718	0.0416	0.1311	(1∶4)	O36…H8—N2	0.1752	0.0354	0.1270
	O48—H49…O9	0.1785	0.0339	0.1113		N48—H66…O10	0.2147	0.0159	0.0474
	O60—H61…O10	0.1889	0.0258	0.0906		O57…H7—N6	0.1717	0.0353	0.1386
	O72—H73…O11	0.1792	0.0309	0.1151		N70—H88…O10	0.1908	0.0266	0.0868
	O84—H85…O9	0.1897	0.0257	0.0825		N90—H108…O11	0.2323	0.0126	0.0450
	O96—H97…O10	0.1847	0.0293	0.0972	BAR-MAA-MBAD	O36…H8—N2	0.1767	0.0350	0.1185
BAR-AM(1∶6)	O27…H8—N2	0.1838	0.0322	0.0962	(1∶1∶2)	N27—H45…O11	0.1989	0.0219	0.0710
	N28—H29…O11	0.2017	0.0212	0.0656		N49—H67…O10	0.2089	0.0178	0.0599
	O37…H7—N6	0.1705	0.0340	0.1328		O78—H79…O9	0.1732	0.0385	0.1253
	N38—H39…O10	0.1986	0.0233	0.0688		O77…H7—N6	0.1782	0.0356	0.1156
	N49—H50…O9	0.2008	0.0215	0.0713	BAR-MAA-AM	O27…H8—N2	0.1729	0.0411	0.1263
	N58—H59…O9	0.2120	0.0174	0.0528	(1∶1∶3)	O28—H29…O11	0.1958	0.0245	0.0733
	N68—H69…O11	0.2184	0.0155	0.0519		O37…H7—N6	0.1794	0.0350	0.1088
	N78—H79…O10	0.2126	0.0174	0.0519		O38—H39…O10	0.1942	0.0252	0.0765
BAR-4-Vpy(1∶3)	N31…H8—N2	0.1742	0.0485	0.1081		O56—H57…O9	0.1750	0.0363	0.1217
	N46…H7—N6	0.1750	0.0476	0.1069		O60—H61…O9	0.2073	0.0186	0.0577

Complex	Action site	R/nm	ρ(r)	▽²ρ(r)	Complex	Action site	R/nm	ρ(r)	▽²ρ(r)
BAR-MAA(1∶6)	O35…H8—N2	0.1764	0.0371	0.1186	BAR-4-Vpy(1∶3)	C56—H62…O10	0.2325	0.0125	0.0381
	O36—H37…O11	0.1783	0.0340	0.1111	BAR-MBAD	N27—H45…O11	0.1979	0.0224	0.0723
	O47…H7—N6	0.1718	0.0416	0.1311	(1∶4)	O36…H8—N2	0.1752	0.0354	0.1270
	O48—H49…O9	0.1785	0.0339	0.1113		N48—H66…O10	0.2147	0.0159	0.0474
	O60—H61…O10	0.1889	0.0258	0.0906		O57…H7—N6	0.1717	0.0353	0.1386
	O72—H73…O11	0.1792	0.0309	0.1151		N70—H88…O10	0.1908	0.0266	0.0868
	O84—H85…O9	0.1897	0.0257	0.0825		N90—H108…O11	0.2323	0.0126	0.0450
	O96—H97…O10	0.1847	0.0293	0.0972	BAR-MAA-MBAD	O36…H8—N2	0.1767	0.0350	0.1185
BAR-AM(1∶6)	O27…H8—N2	0.1838	0.0322	0.0962	(1∶1∶2)	N27—H45…O11	0.1989	0.0219	0.0710
	N28—H29…O11	0.2017	0.0212	0.0656		N49—H67…O10	0.2089	0.0178	0.0599
	O37…H7—N6	0.1705	0.0340	0.1328		O78—H79…O9	0.1732	0.0385	0.1253
	N38—H39…O10	0.1986	0.0233	0.0688		O77…H7—N6	0.1782	0.0356	0.1156
	N49—H50…O9	0.2008	0.0215	0.0713	BAR-MAA-AM	O27…H8—N2	0.1729	0.0411	0.1263
	N58—H59…O9	0.2120	0.0174	0.0528	(1∶1∶3)	O28—H29…O11	0.1958	0.0245	0.0733
	N68—H69…O11	0.2184	0.0155	0.0519		O37…H7—N6	0.1794	0.0350	0.1088
	N78—H79…O10	0.2126	0.0174	0.0519		O38—H39…O10	0.1942	0.0252	0.0765
BAR-4-Vpy(1∶3)	N31…H8—N2	0.1742	0.0485	0.1081		O56—H57…O9	0.1750	0.0363	0.1217
	N46…H7—N6	0.1750	0.0476	0.1069		O60—H61…O9	0.2073	0.0186	0.0577

Complex	ΔE_BSSE/(kJ·mol^-1)	Complex	ΔE_BSSE/(kJ·mol^-1)
BAR-MAA	-114.51	BAR-MBAD-MAA	-46.19
BAR-AM	-63.53	BAR-MBAD	-22.05
BAR-MAA-AM	-53.49	BAR-4-Vpy	-14.44