高等学校化学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1501.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20200679
收稿日期:
2020-09-14
出版日期:
2021-05-10
发布日期:
2020-11-27
通讯作者:
黄长水
E-mail:huangcs@qibebt.ac.cn
基金资助:
GAO Juan1, SUN Quanhu1,2, HUANG Changshui1,2()
Received:
2020-09-14
Online:
2021-05-10
Published:
2020-11-27
Contact:
HUANG Changshui
E-mail:huangcs@qibebt.ac.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
石墨炔纳米材料的制备与应用是石墨炔材料研究的重要方向, 通过对其纳米结构进行设计与优化, 可以提高石墨炔材料及其杂化结构的性能, 拓展其在能源储存与转换领域的应用. 本综述介绍了不同形貌和结构的石墨炔基纳米材料, 如纳米墙、 纳米片、 纳米薄膜等结构. 阐述了不同结构特征的石墨炔基纳米材料在电化学储能器件以及电化学能源催化中的应用, 同时也探讨了石墨炔不同纳米形貌和结构在能源应用领域快速发展的机遇及所面临的挑战.
中图分类号:
TrendMD:
高娟, 孙全虎, 黄长水. 石墨炔纳米材料的制备及在电化学能源中的应用. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(5): 1501.
GAO Juan, SUN Quanhu, HUANG Changshui. Graphdiyne-based Nanostructured Materials and Their Applications in Energy Storage and Conversion. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(5): 1501.
Fig.1 Schematic illustration of the experimental setup(A), top view(B) and cross?sectional view(C) of SEM images of graphdiyne nanowalls on Cu substrate[34], schematic illustration of the synthesis of 3DGDY using diatomite as template(D), schematic representation of an assembled 3DGDY?based LIB(E), charge/discharge profiles(F), rate performance(G) and cycle performance(H) at different current densities of the 3DGDY?based LIBs[35](A—C) Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society; (D—H) Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Fig.2 Schematic of synthesis of GDYNWs and LIBs based on GDYNW(A), top view SEM images(B, C) of GDYNW on Cu substrate, the rate performance of the GDYNW based electrodes for LIBs(D)[47]Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Fig.3 Representation of the synthesis of GDY on CuNW paper(A), photograph of CuNW paper before(B), after(C) growth of GDY, the bendability(D), weight(E) of the Cu@GDY paper, representation of a possible mechanism for the high rate performance(F), electrochemical performance of Cu@GDY paper(G) variations in specific capacity, long?term stability of GDY1 and GDY2 at 5 A/g(H) and GDY2 at 10 and 20 A/g(I)[36]Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Fig.4 Synthetic procedure of GDY?MoS2 hybrid nanomaterial(A), SEM image of GDY?MoS2(B), rate capabilities of GDY?MoS2(C) and pure MoS2(D)[44]Copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Fig.5 Schematic illustration of the synthetic route of PyN?GDY(A), SEM image of PyN?GDY(B), RDE polarization curves in O2?saturated 0.1 mol/L KOH solution at a rotating speed of 1600 r/min with a scan rate of 5 mV/s(C) and schematic diagram for the process of ORR on PyN?GDY(D)[39]Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Fig.6 Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure for Fe?N?GDY catalysts(A), SEM images of 0.1%Fe?N?GDY(B), 1.5%Fe?N?GDY(C) and 2%Fe?N?GDY(D), LSVs of 1.5%Fe?N?Graphene, 1.5%Fe?N?Super P, N?GDY, 1.5%Fe?GDY and 1.5%Fe?N?GDY in O2?saturated 0.1 mol/L KOH at 1600 r/min(E), the Tafel slopes for Fe?N?GDY and Pt/C(F)[38]Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Fig.7 Protocols for the synthesis of Ni/GD and Fe/GD(A), additional HAADF?STEM images of Ni/GD(B) and Fe/GD(C)[inset: size distribution of Ni(B) and Fe(C) atoms counted from HAADF?STEM images, scale bar: 2 nm], HER activities of Ni/GD and Fe/GD: polarization curves of Pt/C(i), Fe/GD(ii), Ni/GD(iii), GDF(iv), and CC(v)(D), onset values of Ni/GD and Fe/GD(red square) along with other catalysts(E), Tafel plots of the presented data(F)[50]Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.
Fig.8 Schematic diagram of preparation for H1F1?GDY and the ball?and?stick model of two precursors(A), structural schematic diagram of H1F1?GDY and the advantages of H and F doped(B), SEM images(C, D) of H1F1?GDY from top view[inset of (D): the structural model of H1F1?GDY], SEM image of H1F1?GDY from side view(E), the cycle performance at 50 mA/g(F) and the stability at 2 A/g of H1F1?GDY(G)[53]Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Fig.9 Schematic illustration and possible reaction pathway for PY?GDY and PM?GDY(A), photographs of a PM?GDY(B), and the bending for the PY?GDY film(C), rate performance of PY?GDY(D) and PM?GDY for LIBs(E)[27], the detailed synthetic route of F?GDY(F), the photograph of the F?GDY film(G), contact angles of water and ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate electrolyte with F?GDY(H), the illustration of Li storage mechanism in F?GDY(I), the rate performance of F?GDY electrodes in Li metal half?cell(J)[55](A—E) Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society; (F—J) Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig.10 Schematic representation of MGDY preparation(A), SEM image of MGDY on the copper foil(B), the CA of the MGDY NTAs changes with time(C), schematic diagram of the MGDY’s protec?tive effect on metals(D), schematic diagram of MGDY NTAs for oil?water separation(E), schematic diagram of an oil?water separator(F), change in the oil?water separation efficiency with time(G)[57]Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH.
1 | Inagaki M., Qiu J., Guo Q., Carbon, 2015, 87, 128—152 |
2 | Luo Y., Yan Y., Zheng S., Xue H., Pang H., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(3), 901—924 |
3 | Chen J., Wu F., Appl. Phys. A⁃Mater., 2004, 78(7), 989—994 |
4 | Sun L., Wang X., Wang Y., Zhang Q., Carbon, 2017, 122, 462—474 |
5 | El⁃Kady M. F., Shao Y., Kaner R. B., Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016, 1(7), 16033 |
6 | Jain V., Kandasubramanian B., J. Mater. Sci., 2020, 55(5), 1865—1903 |
7 | Wang Z., Gao H., Zhang Q., Liu Y., Chen J., Guo Z., Small, 2019, 15(3), 1803858 |
8 | Wu S., Xu R., Lu M., Ge R., Iocozzia J., Han C., Jiang B., Lin Z., Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5(21), 1500400 |
9 | Seman R. N. A. R., Azam M. A., Mohamad A. A., Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2017, 75, 644—659 |
10 | Zhang R., Palumbo A., Kim J. C., Ding J., Yang E.H., Annalen Der Physik, 2019, 531(10), 1800507 |
11 | Abdullah M., Kamarudin S. K., Renew. Sust. Energy Rev.,2017, 76, 212—225 |
12 | Lu Z., Raad R., Safaei F., Xi J., Liu Z., Foroughi J., Front. Mater., 2019, 6, 138 |
13 | Afzal A., Abuilaiwi F. A., Habib A., Awais M., Waje S. B., Atieh M. A., J. Power Sources, 2017, 352, 174—186 |
14 | Jang Y., Kim S. M., Spinks G. M., Kim S. J., Adv. Mater., 2020, 32(5), 1902670 |
15 | Jia Z., Li Y., Zuo Z., Liu H., Huang C., Li Y., Acc. Chem. Res., 2017, 50(10), 2470—2478 |
16 | Huang C., Li Y., Wang N., Xue Y., Zuo Z., Liu H., Li Y., Chem. Rev., 2018, 118(16), 7744—7803 |
17 | Li G., Li Y., Liu H., Guo Y., Li Y., Zhu D., Chem. Commun., 2010, 46(19), 3256—3258 |
18 | Zhang H., Zhao M., He X., Wang Z., Zhang X., Liu X., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115(17), 8845—8850 |
19 | Jang B., Koo J., Park M., Lee H., Nam J., Kwon Y., Lee H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 103(26), 263904 |
20 | Srinivasu K., Ghosh S. K., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116(9), 5951—5956 |
21 | Zhang H., Xia Y., Bu H., Wang X., Zhang M., Luo Y., Zhao M., J. Appl. Phys., 2013, 113(4), 263904 |
22 | Du H., Zhang Z., He J., Cui Z., Chai J., Ma J., Yang Z., Huang C., Cui G., Small, 2017, 13(44), 1702277 |
23 | Huang C., Zhang S., Liu H., Li Y., Cui G., Li Y., Nano Energy, 2015, 11, 481—489 |
24 | Li X., Wang N., He J., Yang Z., Tu Z., Zhao F., Wang K., Yi Y., Huang C., Carbon, 2020, 162, 579—585 |
25 | Shen X., Li X., Zhao F., Wang N., Xie C., He J., Si W., Yi Y., Yang Z., Li X., Lu F., Huang C., 2D Materials, 2019, 6(3), 035020 |
26 | Shen X., He J., Wang K., Li X., Wang X., Yang Z., Wang N., Zhang Y., Huang C., ChemSusChem, 2019, 12(7), 1342—1348 |
27 | Yang Z., Shen X., Wang N., He J., Li X., Wang X., Hou Z., Wang K., Gao J., Jiu T., Huang C., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(3), 2608—2617 |
28 | Zhao F., Wang N., Zhang M., Sapi A., Yu J., Li X., Cui W., Yang Z., Huang C., Chem. Commun., 2018, 54(47), 6004—6007 |
29 | Shen X., Yang Z., Wang K., Wang N., He J., Du H., Huang C., ChemElectrochem, 2018, 5(11), 1435—1443 |
30 | Wang N., Li X., Tu Z., Zhao F., He J., Guan Z., Huang C., Yi Y., Li Y., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(15), 3968—3973 |
31 | Malko D., Neiss C., Vines F., Goerling A., Phys. Rev. Lett.,2012, 108(8), 086804 |
32 | Kang J., Wei Z., Li J., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(3), 2692—2706 |
33 | Cranford S. W., Brommer D. B., Buehler M. J., Nanoscale, 2012, 4(24), 7797—7809 |
34 | Zhou J., Gao X., Liu R., Xie Z., Yang J., Zhang S., Zhang G., Liu H., Li Y., Zhang J., Liu Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(24), 7596—7599 |
35 | Li J., Xu J., Xie Z., Gao X., Zhou J., Xiong Y., Chen C., Zhang J., Liu Z., Adv. Mater.,2018, 30(20), 1800548 |
36 | Shang H., Zuo Z., Li L., Wang F., Liu H., Li Y., Li Y., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57(3), 774—778 |
37 | Yu H., Xue Y., Huang B., Hui L., Zhang C., Fang Y., Liu Y., Zhao Y., Li Y., Liu H., Li Y., iScience, 2019, 11, 31—41 |
38 | Si W., Yang Z., Wang X., Lv Q., Zhao F., Li X., He J., Long Y., Gao J., Huang C., ChemSusChem, 2019, 12(1), 173—178 |
39 | Lv Q., Wang N., Si W., Hou Z., Li X., Wang X., Zhao F., Yang Z., Zhang Y., Huang C., Appl. Catal. B: Environ.,2020, 261, 118234 |
40 | He J., Wang N., Cui Z., Du H., Fu L., Huang C., Yang Z., Shen X., Yi Y., Tu Z., Li Y., Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 1172 |
41 | Qian X., Ning Z., Li Y., Liu H., Ouyang C., Chen Q., Li Y., Dalton Trans., 2012, 41(3), 730—733 |
42 | Xue Y., Guo Y., Yi Y., Li Y., Liu H., Li D., Yang W., Li Y., Nano Energy, 2016, 30, 858—866 |
43 | Lv Q., Si W., He J., Sun L., Zhang C., Wang N., Yang Z., Li X., Wang X., Deng W., Long Y., Huang C., Li Y., Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 3376 |
44 | Gao J., He J., Wang N., Li X., Yang Z., Wang K., Chen Y., Zhang Y., Huang C., Chem. Eng. J.,2019, 373, 660—667 |
45 | Yu H. D., Xue Y. R., Hui L., He F., Zhang C., Liu Y. X., Fang Y., Xiang C. Y., Li Y. J., Liu H. B., Li Y. L., Nano Energy, 2019, 64, 9, 103928 |
46 | Wang K., Wang N., He J., Yang Z., Shen X., Huang C., Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 253, 506—516 |
47 | Matsuoka R., Sakamoto R., Hoshiko K., Sasaki S., Masunaga H., Nagashio K., Nishihara H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139(8), 3145—3152 |
48 | Shang H., Zuo Z., Yu L., Wang F., He F., Li Y., Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(27), 1801459 |
49 | Wang K., Wang N., He J., Yang Z., Shen X., Huang C., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(46), 40604—40613 |
50 | Xue Y., Huang B., Yi Y., Guo Y., Zuo Z., Li Y., Jia Z., Liu H., Li Y., Nat. Commun., 2018, 9(1), 1460 |
51 | Hui L., Xue Y., Yu H., Liu Y., Fang Y., Xing C., Huang B., Li Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141(27), 10677—10683 |
52 | Yu H., Hui L., Xue Y., Liu Y., Fang Y., Xing C., Zhang C., Zhang D., Chen X., Du Y., Wang Z., Gao Y., Huang B., Li Y., Nano Energy, 2020, 72, 104667 |
53 | Lu T., He J., Li R., Wang K., Yang Z., Shen X., Li Y., Xiao J., Huang C., Energy Storage Mater., 2020, 29, 131—139 |
54 | Yang Z., Liu R. R., Wang N., He J. J., Wang K., Li X. D., Shen X. Y., Wang X., Lv Q., Zhang M. J., Luo J., Jiu T. G., Hou Z. F., Huang C. S., Carbon, 2018, 137, 442—450 |
55 | He J., Wang N., Yang Z., Shen X., Wang K., Huang C., Yi Y., Tu Z., Li Y., Energy & Environ. Sci., 2018, 11(10), 2893—2903 |
56 | Wang N., He J., Tu Z., Yang Z., Zhao F., Li X., Huang C., Wang K., Jiu T., Yi Y., Li Y., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56(36), 10740—10745 |
57 | Li X., Wang N., He J., Yang Z., Zhao F., Wang K., Huang C., Small,2020, 16(26),1907013 |
[1] | 黄汉浩, 卢湫阳, 孙明子, 黄勃龙. 石墨炔原子催化剂的崭新道路:基于自验证机器学习方法的筛选策略[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(5): 20220042. |
[2] | 陈朝阳, 薛玉瑞, 李玉良. 石墨炔零价金属原子催化剂的合成及应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(5): 20220063. |
[3] | 孙浩, 宫杰, 杨燕, 王新庆, 陈慧东. 三维有序In2O3纳米线阵列的合成及纳米结构有序度对气敏性能的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1730. |
[4] | 刘冬生. 超分子作用构筑具有高光学不对称性的表面等离子纳米粒子手性组装体[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1619. |
[5] | 窦树珍, 王中舜, 吕男. 硅纳米结构对表面辅助激光解吸/电离质谱检测性能的提高[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(4): 1156. |
[6] | 王雅雯, 李东, 梁文凯, 孙迎辉, 江林. 表面等离激元金属纳米粒子的多元化结构及应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(4): 1213. |
[7] | 桂晨, 王颢霖, 邵柏璇, 杨育景, 徐光青. 熔盐辅助法制备g-C3N4纳米结构及其光催化制氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(3): 827. |
[8] | 高小雅, 左自成, 李玉良. 石墨炔电化学电池界面构筑[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 321. |
[9] | 孙全虎, 卢天天, 何建江, 黄长水. 含异原子石墨炔基电极材料的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 366. |
[10] | 詹舒辉, 赵亚松, 杨乃亮, 王丹. 石墨炔孔结构: 设计、 合成和应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 333. |
[11] | 胡灵, 殷垚, 柯国梁, 张晓兵. 基于DNA纳米结构的细胞间相互作用的调控[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(11): 3284. |
[12] | 安越, 黄汉雄. 注压成型仿生纳米结构聚丙烯表面的冷凝微水滴动态行为[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(8): 1888. |
[13] | 侯春喜, 李逸佳, 王婷婷, 刘盛达, 闫腾飞, 刘俊秋. 弹性肽在超分子组装中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(6): 1163. |
[14] | 林玉才, 裴文乐, 孙若璇, 高春雷, 陈基棚, 郑咏梅. 特殊浸润性表面的液滴凝结[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(6): 1236. |
[15] | 贾宏亮, 赵建伟, 秦丽溶, 赵敏. 基于镍丝负载氧化镍纳米片的尿酸生物传感器[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(2): 240. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||