FOX-12制备过程的反应机理及动力学

doi:10.7503/cjcu20140873

高等学校化学学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 531.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20140873

FOX-12制备过程的反应机理及动力学

王宽^1,², 陈建刚^1,²(), 王伯周³, 吕剑³, 王文亮², 刘峰毅², 周诚³, 廉鹏³, 刘忠文^1,², 刘昭铁^1,²

1. 陕西师范大学应用表面与胶体化学教育部重点实验室
2. 化学化工学院, 西安 710119
3. 西安近代化学研究所, 西安 710065

收稿日期:2014-09-26 出版日期:2015-03-10 发布日期:2015-01-30
作者简介:联系人简介: 陈建刚, 男, 博士, 助理研究员, 主要从事反应动力学与机理以及超临界流体研究. E-mail: jgchen@snnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(批准号: 21306111, 21327011)、陕西省自然科学基金(批准号: 2014JM2034)和中央高校基本科研业务费(批准号: GK201402050, GK201401001)资助

Mechanisms and Kinetics of the Synthesis of FOX-12^†

WANG Kuan^1,², CHEN Jiangang^1,^2,^*(), WANG Bozhou³, LU Jian³, WANG Wenliang², LIU Fengyi², ZHOU Cheng³, LIAN Peng³, LIU Zhongwen^1,², LIU Zhaotie^1,²

1. Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry, Ministry of Education
2. School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
3. Xi’an Modern Chemistry Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, China

Received:2014-09-26 Online:2015-03-10 Published:2015-01-30
Contact: CHEN Jiangang E-mail:jgchen@snnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
† Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.21306111, 21327011), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China(No.2014JM2034), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China(Nos.GK201402050, GK201401001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用量子化学计算方法, 在B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)水平上研究了N-脒基脲二硝基酰胺盐(FOX-12)制备过程的反应机理. 优化得到了反应势能面上各稳定点的几何构型, 通过内禀反应坐标(IRC)确认了反应物、中间体、过渡态及产物之间的相关性. 为了得到更可靠的反应能量和势能面信息, 进一步在MP2/6-311++G(3df,3pd)水平上对得到的构型进行能量校正, 结果表明, 先取代磺酸基通道(A1)和先取代氢通道(B)都能生成二硝基酰胺酸(HDN), 其中通道A为主反应通道; HDN可以通过HDN→FOX-12与HDN→ADN→FOX-12 两种途径转化为目标产物FOX-12, 而第2种途径为较优途径. 应用经典过渡态理论(TST)与变分过渡态理论(CVT)以及小曲率隧道效应模型校正的变分过渡态理论(CVT/SCT)计算了在200~400 K范围内各反应通道相关基元反应的速率常数, 提供了在上述温度区间内的三参数Arrhenius关系式.

关键词: N-脒基脲二硝基酰胺盐(FOX-12), 反应机理, 速率常数, 量子化学计算

Abstract:

The mechanisms of the synthesis of N-guanylurea-dinitramide(FOX-12) were investigated at B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level. The geometries of the reactants, intermediates, transition states, and products were optimized, respectively. The relevance between every transition state and the corresponding reactant/product was confirmed via the intrinsic reaction coordinates(IRC). The single-point energies of the species at the optimized geometries were corrected at the MP2/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level. It was shown that the binitro-amide acid(HDN) could be obtained by both channel A1, in which —SO₃ was preferentially replaced by nitronium(N $O 2 +$ ), and channel B, in which —H was preferentially replaced by N $O 2 +$ , while the channel A1 was found to be the dominant channel. Then the intermediate product of HDN could be converted to the targeted product of FOX-12 via the channel of either HDN→FOX-12 or HDN→amonium dinitramide(ADN)→FOX-12, while the latter was tend to be considered as the better approach. The rate constants were calculated at temperature ranges of 200—400 K by means of the classical transition state theory(TST) and the canonical vibration transition state theory(CVT) corrected by the small-curvature tunneling(SCT). And the three-parameter Arrhenius expressions of rate constants were also provided. It was expected that the present study may provide a theoretical basis to the research and engineering amplification of FOX-12 as well as other energetic materials.

Key words: N-Guanylurea-dinitramide(FOX-12), Mechanism, Rate constant, Quantum chemistry calculation

中图分类号:

O643.1

TrendMD:

王宽, 陈建刚, 王伯周, 吕剑, 王文亮, 刘峰毅, 周诚, 廉鹏, 刘忠文, 刘昭铁. FOX-12制备过程的反应机理及动力学. 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36(3): 531.

WANG Kuan, CHEN Jiangang, WANG Bozhou, LU Jian, WANG Wenliang, LIU Fengyi, ZHOU Cheng, LIAN Peng, LIU Zhongwen, LIU Zhaotie. Mechanisms and Kinetics of the Synthesis of FOX-12^†. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2015, 36(3): 531.

图/表 8

Table 1 Zero-point energies(ZPE), relative energies[ΔE and(ΔE+ZPE)], enthalpies(ΔH), and free energies(ΔG) of reactants, products, transition states, and intermediates during the synthesis process of FOX-12

Route	Species		ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		(ΔE+ZPE)/(kJ·mol^-1)
Route	Species		ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		B3LYP	MP2
A	NH₂S $O 3 -$ +2N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		234.11		0		0		0	0
	A-IM1+N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		236.58		-617.13		-659.09		-658.12	-579.15
	A-TS1+N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		235.83		-527.28		-574.70		-571.52	-517.61
	A-IM2+N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		238.95		-662.48		-693.19		-693.50	-615.60
	A1-IM3+SO₃		242.54		-1231.37		-1307.64		-1306.55	-1161.46
	A1-TS2+SO₃		234.08		-1163.15		-1249.01		-1245.34	-1126.87
	A1-IM4+SO₃		242.56		-1270.19		-1352.04		-1349.98	-1220.69
	A2-IM3+SO₃+HS $O 4 -$		234.47		-695.28		-720.00		-719.45	-608.41
	A2-TS2+SO₃+HS $O 4 -$		222.85		-548.53		-578.98		-576.74	-459.56
	A2-IM4+SO₃+HS $O 4 -$		235.61		-667.95		-701.59		-698.96	-555.50
B	B-IM1+N $O 2 +$		239.72		-691.83		-783.65		-781.62	-694.39
	B-TS1+N $O 2 +$		239.06		-595.52		-691.98		-688.35	-629.50
	B-IM2+N $O 2 +$		247.11		-794.49		-886.47		-883.68	-812.49
	B-IM3+H₂SO₄		243.02		-1221.70		-1309.81		-1306.36	-1174.61
	B-TS2+H₂SO₄		239.73		-1146.81		-1238.48		-1234.21	-1132.00
	B-IM4+H₂SO₄		240.14		-1250.95		-1323.35		-1322.95	-1192.61
	HDN+SO₃+H₂SO₄		237.91		-1279.82		-1315.89		-1312.71	-1167.02
HDN→FOX-12	R+HDN		379.06		0		0		0	0
Route	Species	ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		(ΔE+ZPE)/(kJ·mol^-1)
Route	Species	ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		B3LYP		MP2
HDN→FOX-12	IM1	378.82		-30.79		-74.93		-76.38		-75.23
	TS1	372.62		-34.22		-82.20		-82.08		-79.37
	IM2(FOX-12)	379.85		-58.76		-103.05		-104.68		-96.80

Route	Species		ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		(ΔE+ZPE)/(kJ·mol^-1)
Route	Species		ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		B3LYP	MP2
A	NH₂S $O 3 -$ +2N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		234.11		0		0		0	0
	A-IM1+N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		236.58		-617.13		-659.09		-658.12	-579.15
	A-TS1+N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		235.83		-527.28		-574.70		-571.52	-517.61
	A-IM2+N $O 2 +$ +HS $O 4 -$		238.95		-662.48		-693.19		-693.50	-615.60
	A1-IM3+SO₃		242.54		-1231.37		-1307.64		-1306.55	-1161.46
	A1-TS2+SO₃		234.08		-1163.15		-1249.01		-1245.34	-1126.87
	A1-IM4+SO₃		242.56		-1270.19		-1352.04		-1349.98	-1220.69
	A2-IM3+SO₃+HS $O 4 -$		234.47		-695.28		-720.00		-719.45	-608.41
	A2-TS2+SO₃+HS $O 4 -$		222.85		-548.53		-578.98		-576.74	-459.56
	A2-IM4+SO₃+HS $O 4 -$		235.61		-667.95		-701.59		-698.96	-555.50
B	B-IM1+N $O 2 +$		239.72		-691.83		-783.65		-781.62	-694.39
	B-TS1+N $O 2 +$		239.06		-595.52		-691.98		-688.35	-629.50
	B-IM2+N $O 2 +$		247.11		-794.49		-886.47		-883.68	-812.49
	B-IM3+H₂SO₄		243.02		-1221.70		-1309.81		-1306.36	-1174.61
	B-TS2+H₂SO₄		239.73		-1146.81		-1238.48		-1234.21	-1132.00
	B-IM4+H₂SO₄		240.14		-1250.95		-1323.35		-1322.95	-1192.61
	HDN+SO₃+H₂SO₄		237.91		-1279.82		-1315.89		-1312.71	-1167.02
HDN→FOX-12	R+HDN		379.06		0		0		0	0
Route	Species	ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		(ΔE+ZPE)/(kJ·mol^-1)
Route	Species	ZPE/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔG(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		ΔH(298 K)/ (kJ·mol^-1)		B3LYP		MP2
HDN→FOX-12	IM1	378.82		-30.79		-74.93		-76.38		-75.23
	TS1	372.62		-34.22		-82.20		-82.08		-79.37
	IM2(FOX-12)	379.85		-58.76		-103.05		-104.68		-96.80

Fig.1 Optimized geometries of species of the channels in replacing-SO3 first calculated at B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory Bond length units are in nm.

Fig.2 Energy diagram for the potential energy surface of each nitration path of NH2SO3- in mixed nitric-sulfuric acid predicted at the MP2/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory

Fig.3 Optimized geometries of species of priority to replacing H channels calculated at B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory Bond length units are in nm.

Fig.4 Proposed synthesis pathways for FOX-12

Fig.5 Schematic energy diagram for the potential energy surface of the formation of FOX-12, which directly synthesized from HDN, obtained at the MP2/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory Bond length units are in nm.

Table 2 Calculated rate constants(cm3·molecule-1·s-1) of the elementary reactions during the nitration of NH2SO3- in mixed nitric-sulfuric acid at temperature ranges of 200—400 K

T/K	$k TA - 1 CVT / SC$	$k A 1 - 2 CVT / SCT$	$k A 2 - 2 CVT / SCT$	$k B - 1 CVT / SCT$	$k B - 2 CVT / SCT$
200	6.56×10^-5	4.64×10^-3	1.01×10^-10	1.09×10^-5	5.98×10¹¹
220	1.13×10^-3	5.08×10^-2	9.87×10^-10	7.39×10^-4	5.23×10¹¹
233	5.38×10^-3	1.92×10^-1	3.67×10^-9	2.87×10^-3	4.82×10¹¹
255	5.43×10^-2	1.32×10⁰	2.65×10^-8	2.21×10^-2	4.25×10¹¹
265	1.39×10^-1	2.85×10⁰	6.00×10^-8	5.11×10^-2	4.03×10¹¹
270	2.17×10^-1	4.09×10⁰	8.87×10^-8	7.61×10^-2	3.94×10¹¹
273	2.81×10^-1	5.05×10⁰	1.12×10^-7	9.62×10^-2	3.88×10¹¹
276	3.63×10^-1	6.20×10⁰	1.40×10^-7	1.21×10^-1	3.83×10¹¹
280	5.07×10^-1	8.10×10⁰	1.88×10^-7	1.64×10^-1	3.76×10¹¹
285	7.60×10^-1	1.12×10¹	2.71×10^-7	2.36×10^-1	3.68×10¹¹
295	1.65×10⁰	2.06×10¹	5.45×10^-7	4.75×10^-1	3.54×10¹¹
300	2.38×10⁰	2.76×10¹	7.64×10^-7	6.64×10^-1	3.47×10¹¹
305	3.41×10⁰	3.65×10¹	1.07×10^-6	9.21×10^-1	3.41×10¹¹
310	4.83×10⁰	4.79×10¹	1.47×10^-6	1.27×10⁰	3.36×10¹¹
315	6.78×10⁰	6.22×10¹	2.03×10^-6	1.73×10⁰	3.30×10¹¹
320	9.42×10⁰	8.02×10¹	2.78×10^-6	2.33×10⁰	3.25×10¹¹
325	1.30×10¹	1.02×10²	3.78×10^-6	3.13×10⁰	3.21×10¹¹
330	1.77×10¹	1.30×10²	5.11×10^-6	4.17×10⁰	3.17×10¹¹
335	2.40×10¹	1.63×10²	6.89×10^-6	5.52×10⁰	3.13×10¹¹
340	3.22×10¹	2.04×10²	9.25×10^-6	7.25×10⁰	3.09×10¹¹
350	5.68×10¹	3.13×10²	1.65×10^-5	1.23×10¹	3.03×10¹¹
360	9.74×10¹	4.67×10²	2.88×10^-5	2.03×10¹	2.97×10¹¹
370	1.63×10²	6.81×10²	4.99×10^-5	3.28×10¹	2.93×10¹¹
380	2.65×10²	9.74×10²	8.52×10^-5	5.19×10¹	2.89×10¹¹
400	6.58×10²	1.88×10³	2.41×10^-4	1.23×10¹	2.84×10¹¹

Table 2 Calculated rate constants(cm3·molecule-1·s-1) of the elementary reactions during the nitration of NH2SO3- in mixed nitric-sulfuric acid at temperature ranges of 200—400 K

T/K	$k TA - 1 CVT / SC$	$k A 1 - 2 CVT / SCT$	$k A 2 - 2 CVT / SCT$	$k B - 1 CVT / SCT$	$k B - 2 CVT / SCT$
200	6.56×10^-5	4.64×10^-3	1.01×10^-10	1.09×10^-5	5.98×10¹¹
220	1.13×10^-3	5.08×10^-2	9.87×10^-10	7.39×10^-4	5.23×10¹¹
233	5.38×10^-3	1.92×10^-1	3.67×10^-9	2.87×10^-3	4.82×10¹¹
255	5.43×10^-2	1.32×10⁰	2.65×10^-8	2.21×10^-2	4.25×10¹¹
265	1.39×10^-1	2.85×10⁰	6.00×10^-8	5.11×10^-2	4.03×10¹¹
270	2.17×10^-1	4.09×10⁰	8.87×10^-8	7.61×10^-2	3.94×10¹¹
273	2.81×10^-1	5.05×10⁰	1.12×10^-7	9.62×10^-2	3.88×10¹¹
276	3.63×10^-1	6.20×10⁰	1.40×10^-7	1.21×10^-1	3.83×10¹¹
280	5.07×10^-1	8.10×10⁰	1.88×10^-7	1.64×10^-1	3.76×10¹¹
285	7.60×10^-1	1.12×10¹	2.71×10^-7	2.36×10^-1	3.68×10¹¹
295	1.65×10⁰	2.06×10¹	5.45×10^-7	4.75×10^-1	3.54×10¹¹
300	2.38×10⁰	2.76×10¹	7.64×10^-7	6.64×10^-1	3.47×10¹¹
305	3.41×10⁰	3.65×10¹	1.07×10^-6	9.21×10^-1	3.41×10¹¹
310	4.83×10⁰	4.79×10¹	1.47×10^-6	1.27×10⁰	3.36×10¹¹
315	6.78×10⁰	6.22×10¹	2.03×10^-6	1.73×10⁰	3.30×10¹¹
320	9.42×10⁰	8.02×10¹	2.78×10^-6	2.33×10⁰	3.25×10¹¹
325	1.30×10¹	1.02×10²	3.78×10^-6	3.13×10⁰	3.21×10¹¹
330	1.77×10¹	1.30×10²	5.11×10^-6	4.17×10⁰	3.17×10¹¹
335	2.40×10¹	1.63×10²	6.89×10^-6	5.52×10⁰	3.13×10¹¹
340	3.22×10¹	2.04×10²	9.25×10^-6	7.25×10⁰	3.09×10¹¹
350	5.68×10¹	3.13×10²	1.65×10^-5	1.23×10¹	3.03×10¹¹
360	9.74×10¹	4.67×10²	2.88×10^-5	2.03×10¹	2.97×10¹¹
370	1.63×10²	6.81×10²	4.99×10^-5	3.28×10¹	2.93×10¹¹
380	2.65×10²	9.74×10²	8.52×10^-5	5.19×10¹	2.89×10¹¹
400	6.58×10²	1.88×10³	2.41×10^-4	1.23×10¹	2.84×10¹¹

Fig.6 Logarithms of the calculated rate constants in the rate-limiting step of path A1 at temperature ranges of 200—400 K

参考文献 36

[1]	Bottaro J. C., Penwell P. E., Schmitt R. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119(40), 9405—9410
[2]	Brill T. B., Brush P. J., Patil D. G., Combust. Flame,1993, 92(1/2), 178—186
[3]	Pace M. D., J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98(25), 6251—6257
[4]	Rossi M. J., Bottaro J. C., McMillen D. F., Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 1993, 25(7), 549—570
[5]	Vyazovkin S., Wight A. C., J. Phys. Chem. A,1997, 101(31), 5653—5658
[6]	Ostmark H., Bemm U., Bergman H., Langlet A., Thermochim. Acta,2002, 384(1/2), 253—259
[7]	Wang B. Z., Liu Q., Zhang Z. Z., Ji Y. P., Zhu C. H., Chin. J. Energ. Mater., 2004, 12(1), 38—39
	(王伯周, 刘愆, 张志忠, 姬月萍, 朱春华. 含能材料, 2004, 12(1), 38—39
[8]	Liu Q., Wang B. Z., Zhang Z. Z., Zhu C. H., Lian P., Chin. J. Explos. Propellants,2006, 29(1), 29—31
	(刘愆, 王伯周, 张志忠, 朱春华, 廉鹏. 火炸药学报, 2006, 29(1), 29—31)
[9]	Venkatachalam S., Gopalakrishnan S., Ninan K. N., Propellants Explos., Pyrotech., 2004, 29(3), 178—187
[10]	Zhao F. Q., Chen P., Yuan H. A., Gao S. L., Hu R. Z., Shi Q. Z., Chin. J. Chem., 2004, 22(2), 136—141
[11]	Chen X. F., Yang K., Wang B. Z., J. Phys. Chem. A,2013, 117, 5007—5014
[12]	Cheng K. F., Liu M. H., Yang P. H., Int. J. Quantum Chem., 2012, 112, 703—712
[13]	Lian P., Lai W. P., Wang B. Z., Ge Z. X., Xue Y. Q., Int. J. Quantum Chem., 2011, 111, 2332—2339
[14]	Perreault N. N., Halasz A., Thiboutot S., Ampleman G., Hawari J., Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(10), 5193—5198
[15]	Carin V., Henrik S., Production of Dinitramidic Acid Salts, WO 2005070823,2005-08-04
[16]	Nikolai L., Abraham L., Manufacture of Dinitramide Salts for Propellants, WO9946202,1999-09-16
[17]	Frisch M.J., Trucks G. W., Schlegel H. B., Scuseria G. E., Robb M. A., Cheeseman J. R., Scalmani G., Barone V., Mennucci B., Petersson G. A., Nakatsuji H., Caricato M., Li X., Hratchian H. P., Izmaylov A. F., Bloino J., Zheng G., Sonnenberg J. L., Hada M., Ehara M., Toyota K., Fukuda R., Hasegawa J., Ishida M., Nakajima T., Honda Y., Kitao O., Nakai H., Vreven T., Montgomery J. A. Jr., Peralta J. E., Ogliaro F., Bearpark M., Heyd J. J., Brothers E., Kudin K. N., Staroverov V. N., Keith T., Kobayashi R., Normand J., Raghavachari K., Rendell A., Burant J. C., Iyengar S. S., Tomasi J., Cossi M., Rega N., Millam J. M., Klene M., Knox J. E., Cross J. B., Bakken V., Adamo C., Jaramillo J., Gomperts R., Stratmann R. E., Yazyev O., Austin A. J., Cammi R., Pomelli C., Ochterski J. W., Martin R. L., Morokuma K., Zakrzewski V. G., Voth G. A., Salvador P., Dannenberg J. J., Dapprich S., Daniels A. D., Farkas O., Foresman J. B., Ortiz J. V., Cioslowski J., Fox D. J., Gaussian 09, Revision B.01, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT, 2010
[18]	Jin X. H., Hu B. C., Jia H. Q., Lv C. X., Chem. J. Chinese Universities,2013, 34(7), 1685—1690
	(金兴辉, 胡炳成, 贾欢庆, 吕春绪. 高等学校化学学报, 2013, 34(7), 1685—1690)
[19]	Zhang S. L., Xiong X. F., Yu T., Wang Y. B , Wang B. Z., Ge Z. X., Zhai G. H., Li H., Chem. J. Chinese Universities,2012, 33(7), 1444—1449
	(张淑利, 熊贤峰, 尉涛, 王友兵, 王伯周, 葛忠学, 翟高红, 李华. 高等学校化学学报, 2012, 33(7), 1444—1449)
[20]	Lee C., Yang W., Parr R. G., Phys. Rev. B,1988, 37(2), 785—789
[21]	McLean A. D., Chandler G. S., J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72(10), 5639—5648
[22]	Gonzales C., Schlegel H. B., J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 90(4), 2154—2161
[23]	Lu D. H., Truong T. N., Melissas V. S., Lynch G. C., Liu Y. P., Garrett B. C., Steckler R., Isaacson A. D., Rai S. N., Hancock G. C., Lauderdale J. G., Joseph T., Truhlar D. G., Comput. Phys. Commun., 1992, 71(3), 235—262
[24]	Liu Y. P., Lynch T. N., Truong T. N., Lu D. H., Truhlar D. G., Garret B. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115(6), 2408—2415
[25]	Garrett B. C., Truhlar D. G., J. Chem. Phys., 1979, 70(4), 1593—1598
[26]	Garrett B. C., Truhlar D. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101(16), 4534—4548
[27]	Garrett B. C., Truhlar D. G., Grev R. S., Magnuson A. W., J. Phys. Chem., 1980, 84(13), 1730—1748
[28]	Zhang S.W., Truong T. N., VKLab, Version 1.0, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2001
[29]	Fulvio C., Marina A., Giulia D. P., Maurizio S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112(3), 1014—1018
[30]	Blackall E. L., Hughes E. D., Nature,1952, 170, 972—973
[31]	Hughes E.D., Ingold C., Pearson R. B.,J. Chem. Soc., 1958, 4357—4365
[32]	Blackall E.L., Hughes E. D., Ingold C.,J. Chem. Soc., 1958, 4366—4374
[33]	Lee T. J., Rice J. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 8247
[34]	Swinarski A., Bialozynski G., Roczniki Chemii., 1959, 33, 907—918
[35]	Parker V. D., Kar T., Bethell D., J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78(18), 9522—9525
[36]	Bottaro J. C., Schmitt R. J., Penwell P. E., Ross S., Alto P., Dinitramide Salts ADN Method of Making Same, US 5254324,1993-12-26

FOX-12制备过程的反应机理及动力学

Mechanisms and Kinetics of the Synthesis of FOX-12^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周紫璇, 杨海艳, 孙予罕, 高鹏. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇多相催化剂研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(7): 20220235.
[2]	杨丹, 刘旭, 戴翼虎, 祝艳, 杨艳辉. 金团簇电催化二氧化碳还原反应的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(7): 20220198.
[3]	任娜娜, 薛洁, 王治钒, 姚晓霞, 王繁. 热力学数据对1, 3-丁二烯燃烧特性的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(6): 20220151.
[4]	孙翠红, 吕立强, 刘迎, 王妍, 杨静, 张绍文. 硝酸异丙酯与Cl原子、 OH和NO₃自由基反应的机理及动力学[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210591.
[5]	程媛媛, 郗碧莹. ·OH自由基引发CH₃SSC $H 3 •$ ⁺自由基裂解反应机理的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(10): 20220271.
[6]	孟繁伟, 高琦, 叶青, 李晨曦. Cu-SAPO-18催化剂氨选择性催化还原NO_x钾中毒机理的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(9): 2832.
[7]	杨一莹, 朱荣秀, 张冬菊, 刘成卜. 金催化炔基苯并二𫫇英环化合成8-羟基异香豆素的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(7): 2299.
[8]	李心怡, 刘永军. 人工设计逆醛缩酶RA95.5-8F催化β-羟基酮C—C裂解的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(7): 2306.
[9]	任颖, 李昌华, 王涛, 薛珊珊, 张婷婷, 贾建峰, 武海顺. 钯催化氧化N—H键羰基化反应合成1,3,4⁃噁二唑⁃2(3H)⁃酮杂环化合物机理的理论研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1793.
[10]	李宜蔚, 申屠江涛, 王静波, 李象远. 燃烧反应机理构建的极小反应网络方法： C1燃料燃烧[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1871.
[11]	田胜侨, 韦美菊. Rh(Ⅱ)催化吲哚衍生物[3+3]环化机理及产物性质分析[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1899.
[12]	齐国栋, 叶晓栋, 徐君, 邓风. 分子筛上糖类催化转化的核磁共振研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(1): 148.
[13]	毛庆,赵健,刘松,郭唱,李冰玉,徐可一,曹自强,黄延强. Ni单原子催化剂表面CO₂电还原动力学的电化学谱学解析[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(5): 1058.
[14]	李康明, 李延赛, 易阳杰, 徐雷涛, 叶姣, 欧晓明, 李建明, 胡艾希. 5-吡唑甲酰胺类衍生物的设计、合成与生物活性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(4): 716.
[15]	李象远, 申屠江涛, 李宜蔚, 李娟琴, 王静波. 燃烧反应机理构建的极小反应网络方法氢氧燃烧[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(4): 772.

FOX-12制备过程的反应机理及动力学

Mechanisms and Kinetics of the Synthesis of FOX-12†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Mechanisms and Kinetics of the Synthesis of FOX-12^†