Tunable Synthesis of BiOBr for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Carbamazepine in Wastewater †

doi:10.7503/cjcu20190229

Abstract

Abstract:

A series of BiOBr photocatalysts was prepared with different bromine sources using an ethanol mediated solvothermal method with Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O as precursor. The obtained samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction(XRD), scanning electron microscopy(SEM), Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopy(FTIR), UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy(UV-Vis DRS) and N₂ adsorption-desorption analysis. The results showed that the crystallinity structure, morphology and specific surface were influenced by bromine source. The BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7) sample prepared with KBr and CTAB(molar ratio 3∶7) as bromine sources exhibited high photocatalytic efficiency towards the degradation of carbamazepine under simulated solar light irradiation. The photocatalytic reaction with BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7) as catalyst followed pseudo first-order kinetics model with a reaction rate constant over 4.10, and 2.14 times that with BiOBr(K) and BiOBr(C) as catalyst, respectively. The enhanced photocatalytic activities could be attributed to the highly exposed(110) facet, surface hydroxyl, loose-packed lamellar morphology, as well as large specific surface area and pore volume. Radicals trapping experiments showed that h ⁺, ·OH and e ^- were involved in the photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine.

Key words: Tunable synthesis, Bromine source, BiOBr, Photocatalysis, Carbamazepine

CLC Number:

O643

TrendMD:

GUO Qian,TANG Guangbei,WANG Hao,SUN Qian,GAO Xiaoya. Tunable Synthesis of BiOBr for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Carbamazepine in Wastewater ^†[J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2019, 40(10): 2164.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1 XRD patterns of the as-prepared BiOBr photocatalysts using different Br source a. BiOBr(C); b. BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7); c. BiOBr(K).

Fig.2 FTIR spectra of the as-prepared BiOBr photocatalysts using different Br source a. BiOBr(C); b. BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7); c. BiOBr(K).

Fig.3 SEM images of the as-prepared BiOBr photocatalysts using different Br sources (A, B) BiOBr(K); (C, D) BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7); (E, F) BiOBr(C).

Fig.4 UV-Vis DRS of different BiOBr samples

Fig.5 Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms(A) and pore size distribution curves(B) of different BiOBr samples

Fig.6 Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine solution under simulated solar light irradiation in the presence of different BiOBr photocatalysts [CBZ]0= 2.5 mg/L; [BiOBr] = 0.8 g/L.

Fig.7 Pseudo-first order kinetics for the photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine under simulated solar light irradiation in the presence of different BiOBr photocatalysts [CBZ]0= 2.5 mg/L; [BiOBr] = 0.8 g/L.

Fig.8 HRTEM image of BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7)

Fig.9 Effects of scavengers on the photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine over BiOBr(K∶C=3∶7) a. No quencher; b. N2; c. HCOONa; d. IPA; e. K2Cr2O7.

References 25

[1]	Hoque M. E., Cloutier F., Arcieri C., McInnes M. , Sultana T., Murray C., Vanrolleghem P. A., Metcalfe C. D. , Sci. Total Environ., 2014,487, 801— 812
[2]	Lv M., Sun Q., Hu A. Y., Hou L. Y., Li J. W., Cai X. Yu C. P. , J. Hazard. Mater., 2014,280, 696— 705
[3]	Mohapatra D. P., Brar S. K., Tyagi R. D., Picard P. Surampalli R. Y. , Sci. Total Environ., 2014,470, 58— 75
[4]	Lekkerkerker-Teunissen K., Benotti M. J., Snyder S. A., Dijk H. C. V. , Sep. Purif. Technol., 2012,96, 33— 43
[5]	Zhang Y. J., Geißen S. U., Gal C. M. , Chemosphere, 2008,73, 1151— 1161
[6]	Yan S. H., Wang M., Zha J. M., Zhu L. F., Li W., Luo Q., Sun J., Wang Z. J. , Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018,52(2), 886— 894
[7]	Liu J. X., Wang Y. F., Wang Y. W., Fan C. M. ., Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 2014,30, 729— 737
	( 刘建新, 王韵芳, 王雅文, 樊彩梅 . 物理化学学报, 2014,30, 729— 737)
[8]	Gao X., Zhang X., Wang Y., Peng S., Yue B., Fan C., Chem. Eng. J., 2015,273, 156— 165
[9]	Zhang D. P., Yang K., Li Y., Liu Y. Zhu M. D., Zhong A. H. , J. Alloy. Compd., 2016,684, 719— 725
[10]	Liu Z., Wu B., Xiang D., Zhu Y. , Mater. Res. Bull., 2012,47(11), 3753— 3757
[11]	Li R., Gao X., Fan C., Zhang X., Wang Y., Wang Y. , Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015,355, 1075— 1082
[12]	Xiong X., Ding L., Wang Q., Li Y., Jiang Q., Hu J. , Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 2016,188, 283— 291
[13]	Gao X. M., Dai Y., Fei J., Zhang Y., Fu F. , Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2017,38(7), 1249— 1256
	( 高晓明, 代源, 费娇, 张裕, 付峰 . 高等学校化学学报, 2017,38(7), 1249— 1256)
[14]	Liu X., Cai L., Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018,445, 242— 254
[15]	Fan Q. Z., Liao C. F., Li Z. F., Zhang Z. W., Chen X., Yu C. L. , Chin. J. Inorg. Chem., 2018,34(11), 182— 193
	( 樊启哲, 廖春发, 李之锋, 张志文, 陈鑫, 余长林 . 无机化学学报, 2018,34(11), 182— 193)
[16]	Cheng G., Xiong J., Stadler F. J. , New J. Chem., 2013,37(10), 3207— 3213
[17]	Gao X., Peng W., Tang G., Guo Q., Luo Y ., J. Alloy. Compd., 2018,757, 455— 465
[18]	Gao X., Zhang X., Wang Y., Peng S., Yue B., Fan C., Chem. Eng. J., 2015,263, 419— 426
[19]	Gao X., Tang G., Peng W., Guo Q., Luo Y., Chem. Eng. J., 2019,360, 1320— 1329
[20]	Haroune L., Salaun M., Ménard A., Legault C. Y., Bellenger J. P. , Sci. Total Environ., 2014,475, 16— 22
[21]	Li F. T., Wang Q., Wang X. J., Li B., Hao Y. J., Liu R. H., Zhao D. S. , Appl. Catal. B:Environ., 2014,150, 574— 584
[22]	Liu Y., Son W. J., Lu J., Huang B., Dai Y., Whangbo M. H. , Chem. -Eur. J., 2011,17(34), 9342— 9349
[23]	Cui Z., Mi L., Zeng D. , J. Alloy. Compd., 2013,549, 70— 76
[24]	Ismail A. A., Bahnemann D. W. , J. Mater. Chem., 2011,21(32), 11686— 11707
[25]	Zhang J., Dong M. Y., Liu X., Li H. X. , Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2019,40(1), 123— 129
	( 张晶, 董玉明, 刘湘, 李和兴 . 高等学校化学学报, 2019,40(1), 123— 129)