高等学校化学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 20230128.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20230128
收稿日期:
2023-03-23
出版日期:
2023-07-10
发布日期:
2023-05-08
通讯作者:
李耀文
E-mail:ywli@suda.edu.cn
基金资助:
CHEN Haiyang, LI Xinqi, DING Junyuan, HUANG Yuting, LI Yaowen()
Received:
2023-03-23
Online:
2023-07-10
Published:
2023-05-08
Contact:
LI Yaowen
E-mail:ywli@suda.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
随着以Y6为代表的非富勒烯受体的飞速发展, 有机太阳能电池(OSCs)效率(PCE)已经突破19%. 然而, 其苛刻的制备条件(如使用高挥发性、 剧毒的氯仿为溶剂)并不符合大面积印刷的技术要求和工业环保标准. 本文设计并合成了一种具备硅氧烷重复单元侧链的客体分子BTP-3Si-4F, 可作为增塑剂抑制PM6在非卤化(甲苯)溶液中的预聚集行为, 从而获得纳米尺寸的优势相分离. 最终, 基于甲苯加工的PM6∶Y6∶BTP-3Si-4F和PM6∶BTP-eC9∶BTP-3Si-4F活性层分别获得了16.92%和17.64%的PCEs. 本文结果表明, 通过设计客体分子调控给体的预聚集行为是在非卤化溶液中制备高效OSCs的一种有效的通用策略.
中图分类号:
TrendMD:
陈海阳, 李欣琪, 丁俊源, 黄雨婷, 李耀文. 客体增塑剂调控非卤溶剂中聚合物给体预聚集行为制备高性能有机太阳能电池. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230128.
CHEN Haiyang, LI Xinqi, DING Junyuan, HUANG Yuting, LI Yaowen. Pre-aggregation Manipulation of Polymer Donor Using Guest Plasticizers for Developing Nonhalogenated Green Solvent Processed High-performance Organic Solar Cells. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2023, 44(7): 20230128.
Fig.1 Chemical structures(A), UV⁃Vis absorption spectra(B), energy level diagram(C) of PM6, Y6, and BTP⁃3Si⁃4F films, and the molecular conformations of Y6 and BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(D)
Film | θH2O/(°) | θCH3I/(°) | γd/(mJ·m-2) | γp/(mJ·m-2) | γ/(mJ·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM6 | 101.26 | 62.57 | 26.77 | 0.52 | 27.31 |
Y6 | 84.96 | 57.66 | 25.91 | 4.93 | 30.84 |
BTP⁃3Si⁃4F | 87.30 | 66.80 | 21.68 | 5.25 | 26.93 |
Table 1 Water and diiodomethane contact angles on the PM6, Y6 and BTP-3Si-4F films and the corresponding surface free energy
Film | θH2O/(°) | θCH3I/(°) | γd/(mJ·m-2) | γp/(mJ·m-2) | γ/(mJ·m-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM6 | 101.26 | 62.57 | 26.77 | 0.52 | 27.31 |
Y6 | 84.96 | 57.66 | 25.91 | 4.93 | 30.84 |
BTP⁃3Si⁃4F | 87.30 | 66.80 | 21.68 | 5.25 | 26.93 |
Fig.3 UV⁃Vis absorption spectra of PM6∶Y6, PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F and PM6∶Y6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F blend films(A), FTIR spectra of PM6, BTP⁃3Si⁃4F and the blend(PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F, 100∶100 weight ratio)(B) and the magnified view in the range of 2860—2960 cm-1(C) and 950—1050 cm-1(D)
Fig.4 UV⁃Vis absorption spectra of PM6(A), PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(100:60, mass ratio)(B) and PM6∶Y6(100:60, mass ratio)(C) blend solutions with different temperatures, I0-0/I0-1 values of PM6(D), PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(100:60, mass ratio)(E) and PM6∶Y6(100∶60, mass ratio)(F) at various temperatures, UV⁃Vis absorption spectra of PM6(G), BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(H) and PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(100∶60, mass ratio)(I) blend solutions with different total concentrations, the linearly fitted absorption intensity of max absorption peak(615, 716 and 624 nm correspondingly)⁃concentration relation diagram of PM6(J), BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(K) and PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(100∶60, mass ratio)(L) solution in toluene
Fig.6 J⁃V curves(A) and the corresponding EQE spectra of OSCs based on PM6∶Y6, PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F and PM6∶Y6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F under illumination of AM 1.5G 100 mW/cm2(B), histogram of the PCEs from 20 individual OSCs based on PM6∶Y6 and PM6∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(C), and EL quantum efficiencies at various injected current densities(D)
m(PM6)∶m(Y6)∶m(BTP⁃3Si⁃4F) | Voc/V | Jsc/(mA·cm-2) | Jcala /(mA·cm-2) | FF(%) | PCEmax(PCEavg) b (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶1.2∶0 | 0.830 | 21.45 | 21.23 | 68.63 | 12.22(11.75 | 0.286 |
1∶1.2∶0.2 | 0.846 | 24.04 | 23.63 | 73.60 | 14.98(14.42 | — |
1∶1∶0.4 | 0.857 | 25.45 | 25.01 | 73.68 | 16.01(15.45 | — |
1∶0.8∶0.6 | 0.864 | 26.25 | 25.80 | 74.63 | 16.92(16.54 | 0.263 |
1∶0.6∶0.8 | 0.859 | 25.41 | 25.15 | 73.73 | 16.09(15.53 | — |
1∶0∶1.2 | 0.833 | 22.67 | 21.84 | 67.35 | 12.71(12.10 | 0.291 |
Table 2 Photovoltaic performance parameters of OSCs(Tol) based on based on PM6∶Y6∶BTP-3Si-4F with various ratios of BTP-3Si-4F
m(PM6)∶m(Y6)∶m(BTP⁃3Si⁃4F) | Voc/V | Jsc/(mA·cm-2) | Jcala /(mA·cm-2) | FF(%) | PCEmax(PCEavg) b (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶1.2∶0 | 0.830 | 21.45 | 21.23 | 68.63 | 12.22(11.75 | 0.286 |
1∶1.2∶0.2 | 0.846 | 24.04 | 23.63 | 73.60 | 14.98(14.42 | — |
1∶1∶0.4 | 0.857 | 25.45 | 25.01 | 73.68 | 16.01(15.45 | — |
1∶0.8∶0.6 | 0.864 | 26.25 | 25.80 | 74.63 | 16.92(16.54 | 0.263 |
1∶0.6∶0.8 | 0.859 | 25.41 | 25.15 | 73.73 | 16.09(15.53 | — |
1∶0∶1.2 | 0.833 | 22.67 | 21.84 | 67.35 | 12.71(12.10 | 0.291 |
Fig.7 J⁃V curves(A) and corresponding EQE spectra of inverted devices based on PM6∶BTP⁃eC9∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F blend(B) with various ratios of BTP⁃3Si⁃4F under the illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2, J⁃V curve of device based on PM6∶BTP⁃eC9∶BTP⁃3Si⁃4F(1∶0.8∶0.6) in a conventional device structure of Glass/ITO/PEDOT∶PSS/Active layer/PDINN/Ag(C), photocurrent density versus effective voltage(Jph⁃Veff) characteristics(D), Jsc values of the photovoltaic devices versus light intensity(E), Voc values of the photovoltaic devices versus light intensity(F)
m(PM6)∶m(BTP⁃eC9)∶m(BTP⁃3Si⁃4F) | Voc/V | Jsc/(mA cm-2) | Jcala/(mAcm-2) | FF(%) | PCEmax(PCEavg) b (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶1.2∶0 | 0.834 | 25.88 | 25.87 | 75.90 | 16.38(15.82 |
1∶1∶0.4 | 0.840 | 26.69 | 26.68 | 76.08 | 17.06(16.63 |
1∶0.8∶0.6 | 0.844 | 27.15 | 26.99 | 76.93 | 17.64(17.33 |
1∶0.6∶0.8 | 0.841 | 27.03 | 26.87 | 76.16 | 17.30(17.01 |
Table 3 Photovoltaic performance parameters of OSCs based on PM6∶BTP-eC9∶BTP-3Si-4F blend with various ratios of BTP-3Si-4F
m(PM6)∶m(BTP⁃eC9)∶m(BTP⁃3Si⁃4F) | Voc/V | Jsc/(mA cm-2) | Jcala/(mAcm-2) | FF(%) | PCEmax(PCEavg) b (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1∶1.2∶0 | 0.834 | 25.88 | 25.87 | 75.90 | 16.38(15.82 |
1∶1∶0.4 | 0.840 | 26.69 | 26.68 | 76.08 | 17.06(16.63 |
1∶0.8∶0.6 | 0.844 | 27.15 | 26.99 | 76.93 | 17.64(17.33 |
1∶0.6∶0.8 | 0.841 | 27.03 | 26.87 | 76.16 | 17.30(17.01 |
1 | Li C., Zhou J. D., Song J. L., Xu J. Q., Zhang H. T., Zhang X. N., Guo J., Zhu L., Wei D. H., Han G. C., Min J., Zhang Y., Xie Z. Q., Yi Y. P., Yan H., Gao F., Liu F., Sun Y. M., Nat. Energy, 2021, 6(6), 605—613 |
2 | Zhu L., Zhang M., Xu J. Q., Li C., Yan J., Zhou G. Q., Zhong W. K., Hao T. Y., Song J. L., Xue X. N., Zhou Z. C., Zeng R., Zhu H. M., Chen C. C., MacKenzie R. C. I., Zou Y. C., Nelson J., Zhang Y. M., Sun Y. M., Liu F., Nat. Mater., 2022, 21(6), 656—663 |
3 | Chen T. Y., Li S. X., Li Y. K., Chen Z., Wu H. T., Lin Y., Gao Y., Wang M. T., Ding G. Y., Min J., Ma Z. F., Zhu H. M., Zuo L. J., Chen H. Z., Adv. Mater., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202300400 |
4 | Yuan J., Zhang, Y. Q., Zhou L. Y., Zhang G. C., Yip H. L., Lau T. K., Lu X. H., Zhu C., Peng H. J., Johnson P. A., Leclerc M., Cao Y., Ulanski J., Li Y. F., Zou Y. P., Joule, 2019, 3(4), 1140—1151 |
5 | Zhan L. L., Li S. X., Li Y. K., Sun R., Min J., Bi Z. Z., Ma W., Chen Z., Zhou G. Q., Zhu H. M., Shi M. M., Zuo L. J., Chen H. Z., Joule, 2022, 6(3), 662—675 |
6 | Qian D. P., Ye L., Zhang M. J., Liang Y. R., Li L. J., Huang Y., Guo X., Zhang S. Q., Tan Z. A., Hou J. H., Macromolecules, 2012, 45(24), 9611—9617 |
7 | Lee W. Y., Giri G., Diao Y., Tassone C. J., Matthews J. R., Sorensen M. L., Mannsfeld S. C. B., Chen W. C., Fong H. H., Tok J. B. H., Toney M. F., He M. Q., Bao Z. N., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2014, 24(23), 3524—3534 |
8 | Hu H. W., Jiang K., Chow P. C. Y., Ye L., Zhang G. Y., Li Z. K., Carpenter J. H., Ade H., Yan H., Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 8(5), 1701674 |
9 | Xie B. M., Zhang K., Hu Z. C., Fang H. Y., Lin B. J., Yin Q. W., He B. T., Dong S., Ying L., Ma W., Huang F., Yan H., Cao Y., Sol. RRL, 2019, 4(3), 1900385 |
10 | Kim N. K., Jang S. Y., Pace G., Caironi M., Park W. T., Khim D., Kim J., Kim D. Y., Noh Y. Y., Chem. Mater., 2015, 27(24), 8345—8353 |
11 | Rasool S., Vu D. V., Song C. E., Lee H. K., Lee S. K., Lee J. C., Moon S. J., Shin W. S., Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9(21), 1900168 |
12 | Duan C. H., Gao K., van Franeker J. J., Liu F., Wienk M. M., Janssen R. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138(34), 10782—10785 |
13 | Yuan J., Zhang Y. Q., Zhou L. Y., Zhang G. C., Yip H. L., Lau T. K., Lu X. H., Zhu C., Peng H. J., Johnson P. A., Leclerc M., Cao Y., Ulanski J., Li Y. F., Zou Y. P., Joule, 2019, 3(4), 1140—1151 |
14 | Chen H. Y., Zhang R., Chen X. B., Zeng G., Kobera L., Abbrent S., Zhang B., Chen W. J., Xu G. Y., Oh J., Kang S. H., Chen S. S., Yang C., Brus J., Hou J. H., Gao F., Li Y. W., Li Y. F., Nat. Energy, 2021, 6(11), 1045—1053 |
15 | Sun W. W., Chen H. Y., Zhang B., Cheng Q. R., Yang H. Y., Chen, Z. Y., Zeng G., Ding J. Y., Chen W. J., Li Y. W., Chinese J. Chem., 2022, 40(24), 2963—2972 |
16 | Huang Y. T., Chen H. Y., Fan Q. P., Chen Z. Y., Ding J. Y., Yang H. Y., Sun Z., Zhang R., Chen W. J., Yang C., Gao F., Li Y. W., Chinese J. Chem., 2023, doi:10.1002/cjoc.202200770 |
17 | Popovic D., Ata I., Krantz J., Lucas S., Linden M., Mena⁃Osteritz E., Bauerle P., J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5(38), 9920—9928 |
18 | Koster L. J. A., Mihailetchi V. D., Ramaker R., Blom P. W. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 2005, 86(12), 123509 |
19 | Blom P. W. M., Mihailetchi V. D., Koster L. J. A., Markov D. E., Adv. Mater., 2007, 19(12), 1551—1566 |
20 | Chen H. Y., Zhan Y., Xu G. Y., Chen W. J., Wang S. H., Zhang M. Y., Li Y. W., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30(36), 2001788 |
21 | Chen H. Y., Cheng Q. R., Liu H., Cheng S., Wang S. H., Chen W. J., Shen Y. X., Li X. Q., Yang H. D., Yang H. Y., Xi J. C., Chen Z. Y., Lu X. H., Lin H. Z., Li Y. W., Li Y. F., Sci. Bull., 2022, 67(12), 1243—1252 |
22 | Cheng Q. R., Chen H. Y., Yang F., Chen, Z. Y., Chen W. J., Yang H. Y., Shen Y. X., Ou X. M., Wu Y. Y., Li Y. W., Li Y. F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61(42), e202210613 |
23 | Gao L., Zhang Z. G., Xue L. W., Min J., Zhang J. Q., Wei Z. X., Li Y. F., Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(9), 1884—1890 |
24 | Grand C., Baek S., Lai T. H., Deb N., Zajaczkowski W., Stalder R., Müllen K., Pisula W., Bucknall D. G., So F., Reynolds J. R., Macromolecules, 2016, 49(11), 4008—4022 |
25 | Fan B. B., Du X. Y., Liu F., Zhong W. K., Ying L., Xie R. H., Tang X. F., An K., Xin J. M., Li N., Ma W., Brabec C. J., Huang F., Cao Y., Nat. Energy, 2018, 3(12), 1051—1058 |
26 | de Zerio A. D., Müller C., Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(28), 1702741 |
27 | Liao X. F., Xie Q., Guo Y. X., He Q. N., Chen Z., Yu N., Zhu P. P., Cui Y. J., Ma Z. F., Xu X. B., Zhu H. M., Chen Y. W., Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15(1), 384—394 |
28 | Rasool S., Vu D. V., Song C. E., Lee H. K., Lee S. K., Lee J. C., Moon S. J., Shin W. S., Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9(21), 1900168 |
29 | Kim J. Y., Park S., Lee S., Ahn H., Joe S. Y., Kim B. J., Son H. J., Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(30), 1801601 |
30 | Wang Y. L., Yan L. P., Ji G. Q., Wang C., Gu H. M., Luo Q., Chen Q., Chen L. W., Yang Y. Z., Ma C. Q., Liu X. G., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(2), 2243—2253 |
31 | Cheng P., Yan C. Q., Lau T. K., Mai J. Q., Lu X. H., Zhan X. W., Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(28), 5822—5829 |
32 | Liang Q. J., Jiao X. C., Yan Y., Xie Z. Y., Lu G. H., Liu J. G., Han Y. C., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29(47), 1807591 |
33 | Song J. L., Li C., Zhu L., Guo J., Xu J. Q., Zhang X. N., Weng K. K., Zhang K. N., Min J., Hao X. T., Zhang Y., Liu F., Sun Y. M., Adv. Mater., 2019, 31(52), e1905645 |
34 | Li Y., Cai Y. H., Xie Y. P., Song J. H., Wu H. B., Tang Z., Zhang J., Huang F., Sun Y. M., Energy Environ. Sci., 2021, 14(9), 5009—5016 |
[1] | 郭赟彤, 陈振宇, 葛子义. 不同卤化端基的非富勒烯受体对有机太阳能电池的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230084. |
[2] | 张永倩, 朱小玉, 苗俊辉, 刘俊, 王利祥. 烷基链支化位点对全稠环小分子受体聚集的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230068. |
[3] | 张有辉, 杨娜, 段娜, 程毓君, 游诗勇, 吴飞燕, 谌烈. 端基修饰聚合物给体制备高性能有机太阳能电池[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230169. |
[4] | 方海盛, 梁世洁, 肖承义, 夏冬冬, 李韦伟. 基于刚性连接单元的双缆共轭高分子材料的合成及在单组分有机太阳能电池中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230146. |
[5] | 时宇, 张榴, 国霞, 王阳, 肖海芹, 房进, 周祎, 张茂杰. 聚合物添加剂作为形貌调节剂提升全小分子有机太阳能电池的效率和稳定性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230047. |
[6] | 赵明新, 姚志刚, 刘中原, 徐文婧, 马晓玲, 张福俊. 逐层沉积型有机太阳能电池的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230120. |
[7] | 韦晚霞, 周先敏, 董馨韵, 刘铁峰, 谢聪, 程靖宇, 陈建平, 陆鑫, 冯凯, 周印华. 交联PEDOT∶F空穴传输层提升柔性有机光伏电池性能的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230069. |
[8] | 司文钦, 李腾飞, 林禹泽. 非对称稠环光伏电子受体[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230149. |
[9] | 何韦, 陈飞, 李鸿祥, 王嘉宇, 秦家强, 崔宁博, 严岑琪, 程沛. 基于三氟苯甲酸自组装阳极界面层的高性能有机太阳能电池[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230161. |
[10] | 张亿, 单通, 王焱, 钟洪亮. 以锗为桥接原子的受体材料及其在有机太阳能电池中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(7): 20230050. |
[11] | 张万斌, 王艳蒙, 王少武, 童欣, 韩小倩, 张策, 张光华, 朱秀忠. 烷基功能化聚烯丙基缩水甘油醚的制备及对PVC的增塑及抗静电作用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(9): 2961. |
[12] | 赵宝东, 刘亚静, 潘永飞, 刘卫孝, 高福磊, 汪营磊. 含能增塑剂2, 2-偕二硝基丙基三氟丙酸酯的合成及性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(9): 2815. |
[13] | 高传慧, 郭方荣, 王晓红, 张欣华, 王传兴, 武玉民. 新型聚酯增塑剂的合成及增塑聚氯乙烯性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36(8): 1634. |
[14] | 江献财, 宋杰, 蒋婷, 代华, 张熙. 氯化镁/聚乙二醇复配增塑剂热塑加工聚乙烯醇[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2013, 34(10): 2451. |
[15] | 吕瑞华, 周昌林, 雷景新, 李启满. 软质聚氯乙烯分子网络及其Gaussian模量[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2008, 29(5): 1050. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||