氧化石墨烯-海藻酸钠-壳聚糖复合支架的制备及表征

doi:10.7503/cjcu20200217

高等学校化学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2099.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20200217

• 高分子化学 • 上一篇

氧化石墨烯-海藻酸钠-壳聚糖复合支架的制备及表征

王博蔚¹, 马瑞², 吴凡¹, 刘志辉², 李凌锋², 张骁², 刘定坤², 杨楠², 李美慧², 杨德峰¹(), 孙琪²

^1.吉林大学第二医院, 长春 130021
^2.吉林大学口腔医院, 长春 130041

收稿日期:2020-04-20 出版日期:2020-09-10 发布日期:2020-09-02
通讯作者: 杨德峰 E-mail:yangdefeng1979@sina.com
基金资助:
吉林省科技厅重点科技研发项目(20180201056YY);吉林省科技厅医药健康项目(20190304032YY)

Preparation and Characterization of Graphene Oxide-sodium Alginate-chitosan Composite Scaffold

WANG Bowei¹, MA Rui², WU Fan¹, LIU Zhihui², LI Lingfeng², ZHANG Xiao², LIU Dingkun², YANG Nan², LI Meihui², YANG Defeng¹(), SUN Qi²

^1.The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
^2.Stomatology Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China

Received:2020-04-20 Online:2020-09-10 Published:2020-09-02
Contact: YANG Defeng E-mail:yangdefeng1979@sina.com
Supported by:
Supported by the Key Science and Technology Research and Development Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Science and Technology, China(20180201056YY);Medicine and Health Project of Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department, China(20190304032YY)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过冷冻干燥技术, 将不同量的氧化石墨烯与海藻酸钠和壳聚糖复合, 构建复合支架材料. 研究了不同的氧化石墨烯含量(质量分数0, 0.3%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 1%)对支架材料微观结构、孔隙率、溶胀比、体外降解性能、机械性能及生物相容性的影响, 以确定复合支架中最佳氧化石墨烯含量. 研究结果表明, 复合材料呈固态海绵状结构, 具有一定的形态可塑性; 扫描电子显微镜观察发现, 各组支架均为三维网状结构, 随着氧化石墨烯含量的增加, 孔隙尺寸逐渐降低, 孔壁厚度增加, 孔隙尺寸在140~240 μm之间; 随氧化石墨烯含量的增加, 复合支架溶胀比和体外降解速率逐渐降低, 而机械强度明显增强; 体外细胞毒性显示, 当氧化石墨烯质量分数为0.3%时, 细胞存活率最高, 而当氧化石墨烯含量增高时, 细胞活性会被明显抑制, 造成细胞死亡. 因此, 氧化石墨烯在复合支架中最佳含量为0.3%.

关键词: 支架, 氧化石墨烯, 海藻酸钠, 壳聚糖

Abstract:

The composite scaffold material was constructed by freeze-drying technology from graphene oxide, sodium alginate and chitosan. The effects of graphene oxide content on the microstructure, porosity, swelling ratio, in vitro degradation performance, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the scaffold materials were studied to determine the optimal graphene oxide content in the composite scaffold. The results show that the composite material has a solid sponge-like structure with a certain morphological plasticity. Scanning electron microscopy(SEM) observations show that each group of supports has a three-dimensional network structure. As the content of graphene oxide increased, the pore size gradually decreased and the pore wall thickness increased, the swelling ratio and degradation rate of the composite scaffold gradually decreased while the mechanical strength was significantly enhanced. Results of in vitro cytotoxicity showed that when the graphene oxide content was 0.3%(mass fraction), the cell survival rate was the highest, and when the graphene oxide content increased, the cell activity was significantly inhibited, causing cell death. Finally, the optimal content of graphene oxide in the composite scaffold is 0.3%. Our research lays a good foundation for the application of graphene oxide in bone tissue engineering materials.

Key words: Scaffold, Graphene oxide, Sodium alginate, Chitosan

中图分类号:

O636

TrendMD:

王博蔚, 马瑞, 吴凡, 刘志辉, 李凌锋, 张骁, 刘定坤, 杨楠, 李美慧, 杨德峰, 孙琪. 氧化石墨烯-海藻酸钠-壳聚糖复合支架的制备及表征. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(9): 2099.

WANG Bowei, MA Rui, WU Fan, LIU Zhihui, LI Lingfeng, ZHANG Xiao, LIU Dingkun, YANG Nan, LI Meihui, YANG Defeng, SUN Qi. Preparation and Characterization of Graphene Oxide-sodium Alginate-chitosan Composite Scaffold. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2020, 41(9): 2099.

图/表 10

Table 1 Toxicity classification criteria and toxicity evaluation results

Cytotoxicity level	Relative growth rate(RGR, %)	Evaluation
0	≥100	Qualified
1	75—99	Qualified
2	50—74	Valuation combined with the cell shape
3	25—49	Disqualified
4	1—24	Disqualified
5	0	Disqualified

Fig.1 FTIR spectra of SA(a), CS(b), SA?CS(c), 0.3GO(d), 0.5GO(e), 0.7GO(f) and 1GO(g)

Fig.2 Photographs of SA?CS(A), 0.3GO(B), 0.5GO(C), 0.7GO(D) and 1GO(E)

Fig.3 SEM images of SA?CS(A), 0.3GO(B), 0.5GO(C), 0.7GO(D) and 1GO(E)

Fig.4 SEM images showing the wall thickness of SA?CS(A), 0.3GO(B), 0.5GO(C), 0.7GO(D) and 1GO(E)

Fig.5 Swelling ratios of the scaffoldsa. SA?CS; b. 0.3GO; c. 0.5GO; d. 0.7GO; e. 1GO.

Fig.6 Porosities of the scaffoldsa. SA?CS; b. 0.3GO; c. 0.5GO; d. 0.7GO; e. 1GO.

Fig.7 Plots of mass loss of scaffolds

Fig.8 Elastic modulus of the scaffolds

Fig.9 In vitro cytotoxicity of the scaffold

参考文献 28

1	Ho⁃Shui⁃Ling A., Bolander J., Rustom L. E., Johnson A. W., Luyten F. P., Picart C., Biomaterials, 2018, 180, 143―162
2	Bray C. C., Walker C. M., Spence D. D., Orthop. Clin. No. Am., 2017, 48, 333―342
3	Gómez⁃Barrena E., Rosset P., Lozano D., Stanovici J., Ermthaller C., Gerbhard F., Bone, 2015, 70, 93―101
4	Zhang D. W., Wu X. W., Chen J. D., Lin K. L., Bioact. Mater., 2017, 3(1), 129―138
5	O’Brien., Fergal J., Mater. Today, 2011, 14, 88―95
6	Langer R., Acco. Chem. Res., 2000, 33(2), 94―101
7	Kuo Z. K., Lai P. L., Toh E. K. W., Weng C. H., Tseng H. W., Chang P. Z., Chen C. C., Cheng C. M., Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 32884
8	Liu Z. H., Lu Y. D., Feng W., Yang J. X., Gao S., Song L. J., Wang Y., Wang B. W., Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2018, 34(4), 670―675
9	Benavides S., Villalobos⁃Carvajal R., Reyes J. E., J. Food Eng., 2012, 110(2), 232―239
10	Liao J. F., Wang B. Y., Huang Y. X., Qu Y., Peng J. R., Qian Z. Y., Acs Omega,2017, 2(2), 443―454
11	Abreu F. O. M. S., Bianchini C., Forte M. M. C., Kist T. B. L., Carbohydr. Polym., 2008, 74(2), 283―289
12	Li Z., Ramay H. R., Hauch K. D., Zhang M., Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 3919―3928
13	Younes I., Rinaudo M., Mar. Drugs, 2015, 13(3), 1133―1174
14	Yaylaci S. U., Sen M., Bulut O., Arslan E., Guler M. O., Tekinay A. B., ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2016, 2, 871―878
15	Martin R. V., Brenda V. R., Rodrigo R. Z., Dnaiel A. S. K., Luis F. Q. O., BioMed Reserch Inter., 2015, 2015, 821279
16	Levengood S. K. L., Zhang M., J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2(21), 3161―3184
17	Shen H., Zhang L. M., Liu M., Zhang Z. J., Theranostics, 2012, 2(3), 283―294
18	Deepachitra R, Nigam R, Purohit S. D.,Kumar B. S., Hemalatha T., Sastry T. P., Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2015,30(6), 804― 811
19	Zhao X., Zhang Q. H., Hao Y. P., Li Y. Z., Fang Y., Chen D. J., Macromolecules, 2010, 43(22), 9411―9416
20	Purohit S. D., Bhaskar R., Singh H., Yadav I., Gupta M. K., Mishra N. C., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2019, 133, 592―602
21	Wang H. L., Chen F. L., Chen T., Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences, 2010, 32(4), 469―472(王宏丽, 陈风雷, 陈涛．云南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 32(4), 469―472)
22	Nahman S., Belmaker R., AzabA N., Innate Immun., 2012, 18(3), 447―458
23	Wang L., Lu C. X., Li Y. H., Wu F., Zhao B., Dong X. Z., RSC Advances, 2015, 5(96), 78660―78668
24	Kavya K. C., Jayakumar R., Nair S., Chennnazhi K. P., Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2013, 59, 255―263
25	Unnithan A. R., Park C. H., Kim C. S., Composites B, 2016, 90, 503―511
26	Alsberg E., Kong H. J., Hirano Y., Smith M. K., Albeiruti A., Mooney D. J., J. Dent. Res., 2003, 82, 903―908
27	Wan Y. Z., Chen X. Q., Xiong G. Y., Guo R. S., Luo H. L., Mater. Express, 2014,(4), 429―434
28	Yang J. R., Shi G. S., Tu Y. S., Fang H. P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53(38), 10190―10194

[1]	王瑞娜, 孙瑞粉, 钟添华, 池毓务. 大尺寸石墨烯量子点组装体的制备及电化学发光性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(8): 20220161.
[2]	夏雾, 任颖异, 刘京, 王锋. 壳聚糖包裹CdSe量子点组装体的水相可见光催化CO₂还原[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(7): 20220192.
[3]	杨隽阁, 高成乾, 李博鑫, 尹德忠. 改性氧化石墨烯稳定Pickering乳液法制备高导热相变整体材料[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210593.
[4]	张志博, 尚涵, 徐文轩, 韩广东, 崔金声, 杨皓然, 李瑞鑫, 张生辉, 徐欢. 氧化石墨烯插层聚β-羟基丁酸酯复合材料的结晶形态与宏观性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210566.
[5]	胡波, 朱昊辰. 双层氧化石墨烯纳米体系中受限水的介电常数[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210614.
[6]	俞彬, 谌小燕, 赵越, 陈卫昌, 肖新颜, 刘海洋. 氧化石墨烯基钴卟啉复合材料的电催化析氢反应[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210549.
[7]	王雪丽, 宋相伟, 解颜宁, 杜妮阳, 王振新. 部分还原氧化石墨烯的制备、表征及对人宫颈癌HeLa细胞的体外杀伤作用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210595.
[8]	朱德帅, 赵剑英, 杨正慧, 郭海泉, 高连勋. 基于多层结构设计的高储能密度氧化石墨烯/聚酰亚胺复合材料[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(8): 2694.
[9]	李佩鸿, 张春玲, 戴雪岩, 隋颜隆. 氧化石墨烯/聚合物复合水凝胶的研究进展[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1694.
[10]	苗伟俊, 吴锋, 王勇, 王宗宝. 高剪切速率对PCL/RGO附生结晶行为影响的原位研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(3): 910.
[11]	黄东雪, 章颖, 曾婷, 张媛媛, 万其进, 杨年俊. 基于过渡金属硫化物/还原氧化石墨烯复合物的高性能超级电容器[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 643.
[12]	王明霞, 刘志辉, 朱镇, 李凌锋, 王博蔚. 纳米硅酸镁锂-壳聚糖-海藻酸钠复合支架材料的制备与性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(10): 3240.
[13]	张卫国, 范松华, 王宏智, 姚素薇. α-Fe₂O₃/石墨烯水凝胶复合材料的自组装制备及电化学性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(8): 1850.
[14]	陈砚田, 郄晗彤, 张胤杰, 周彩吉, 谭笑, 林爱军. 还原氧化石墨烯负载零价铁的合成及对TNT废水处理[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(8): 1836.
[15]	曹锰, 柳阳, 张尚玺, 王振希, 徐胜. 壳聚糖钴配合物的合成及光催化产氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(4): 735.

氧化石墨烯-海藻酸钠-壳聚糖复合支架的制备及表征

Preparation and Characterization of Graphene Oxide-sodium Alginate-chitosan Composite Scaffold

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价