Construction of Cyclodextrin Polymeric Membrane Sensor Based on Graphene and Potential Recognition for Histidine Enantiomer†

doi:10.7503/cjcu20180562

Abstract

Abstract:

Cyclodextrin polymer with chiral recognition function were selected as chiral selectors, and graphene materials with excellent performance were used to further amplify the difference in peak potential response, cyclodextrin polymeric membrane sensor based on graphene was constructed by layer modification. There was a significant difference in the peak potential response between two components of histidine enantiomer. The potential difference is nearly 100 mV. A good linear relationship was showed between the oxidation peak potential and enantiomeric excess of the mixed solution. The mixed solution consists of different ratios of two components histidine enantiomer. A new method for simultaneously identifying two components of histidine enantiomer by potential response can be established.

Key words: Histidine enantiomer, Potential recognition, Graphene, Cyclodextrin

CLC Number:

O657

TrendMD:

WU Yan,LIAN Huiting,SUN Xiangying,LIU Bin. Construction of Cyclodextrin Polymeric Membrane Sensor Based on Graphene and Potential Recognition for Histidine Enantiomer^†[J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2019, 40(2): 230.

Figures/Tables 14

Scheme 1 Schematic illustration for the preparation of the PCD/rGO/GCE and recognition for His

Fig.1 DPV responses of histidine enantiomer on the GCE(A), PCD/GCE(B) and PCD/rGO/GCE(C)The arrows of (A)—(C) show the potential scan direction.

Fig.2 Potential difference of D/L-His on PCD/rGO/GCE with different concentrations of GO(A) and with different reduction cycles of GO(B)

Fig.3 Potential difference of D/L-His on PCD/rGO/GCE with different polymerized cycles of CD(A) and with different concentrations of CD polymerized solution(B)

Fig.4 Potential difference of the D/L-His on PCD/rGO/GCE with different pH(A) and the oxidation potential of histidine enantiomer with different pH values(B)

Fig.5 CV curves in the electro-polymerization of CD

Fig.6 High-resolution XPS spectra of C1s(A), O1s(B) of PCD

Fig.7 SEM images of GCE(A), rGO(B) and PCD/rGO(C)

Fig.8 Raman spectra of GO(a), rGO(b) and PCD/rGO(c)

Fig.9 Recognition of the D/L-His on GCE(A) and PCD/rGO/GCE(B) with EIS

Scheme 2 Schematic illustration for establishment of potential identification methodThe arrows of (A)—(C) show the potential scan direction.

Fig.10 DPV response of PCD/rGO/GCE sensor for different ratio of L/D-His(total concentration 100 μmol/L)(A) and the curve of peak potential Ep to e.e. value(B)The arrow of (A) shows the potential scan direction.

Table 1 Change of potential(E/V) for the ratios of 5:5, 3:7 and 7:3 between L-His and D-His

L-His to D-His ratio	c/(μmol·L^-1)
L-His to D-His ratio	30	50	70	80	100	200	500	800	1000
5:5	1.143	1.140	1.128	1.125	1.125	1.124	1.125	1.125	1.125
3:7	1.100	1.100	1.090	1.090	1.090	1.090	1.095	1.090	1.092
7:3	1.068	1.165	1.150	1.150	1.150	1.152	1.150	1.150	1.150

Fig.11 Response ratio(ΔE/ΔE0) of the PD of L/D-His on PCD/rGO/GCE in the presence of 1 and 10 times of the concentration of chiral coexistences(A), recognition of the His, tryptophan and tyrosine on PCD/rGO/GCE(B)(A) a. L-Tyr; b. D-Tyr; c. L-Trp; d. D-Trp; e. L-Pen; f. D-Pen; g. L-Pro; h. D-Pro.

References 28

[1]	Prasad B. B., Kumar D., Madhuri R., Tiwari M. P., Biosens. Bioelectron., 2011, 28(1), 117-126
[2]	Wade M. A., J. Nutr. Biochem., 1998, 9(6), 308-315
[3]	Zhang C. H., Zhang H. B., Hu Y. F., Chem. J. Chinese Universities,2008, 29(10), 1941-1946
	(张朝晖, 张华斌, 胡宇芳. 高等学校化学学报, 2008, 29(10), 1941-1946)
[4]	Gu P., Zhang G., Deng Z., Tang Z., Zhang H., Khusbu F. Y., Wu K., Chen M., Ma C., Spectrochim. Acta A,2018, 203, 195-200
[5]	Kang Y., Oh J., Kim Y., Kim J. S., Kim H., Chem. Commun., 2010, 46(31), 5665-5667
[6]	Han C., Hou X., Zhang H., Guo W., Li. H., Jiang L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133(20), 7644-7647
[7]	Nie R., Bo X., Wang H., Zeng L., Guo L., Electrochem. Commun., 2013, 27, 112-115
[8]	Geim A. K., Katsnelson M. I., Novoselov K. S., Nat. Phys., 2006, 2(9), 620-625
[9]	Chang J., Chang K., Hu C., Cheng W., Zen J., Electrochem. Commun., 2010, 12(4), 596-599
[10]	Kauppila J., Kunnas P., Damlin P., Electrochimi. Acta,2013, 89, 84-89
[11]	Zhang D., Fang Y., Miao Z., Ma M., Du X., Electrochimi. Acta,2013, 107, 656-663
[12]	Corona-Avendaño S., Ramírez-Silva M. T., Romero-Romo M., Electrochim. Acta,2013, 89, 854-860
[13]	Roa Morales G., Ramírez Silva T., Galicia L., J. Solid State Electrochem.,2003, 7(6), 355-360
[14]	Liu Y. R., Wei M.T., Hu Y., Zhu L. L., Du J. Y., Sens. Actuators B: Chem., 2018, 255, 544-551
[15]	Wang L., Int. J. Electrochem. Sc., 2018, 13, 1594-1602
[16]	Cheol-Joo Kim. A., Sánchez C., Zack Z., Yui O., Nat. Nanotechnol., 2016, 11(6), 520-525
[17]	Trojanowicz M., Electrochem. Commun., 2014, 38, 47-52
[18]	Liu Y. L., Zhu L. L., Hu Y., Peng X. S., Du J., Food. Chem., 2017, 221, 1128-1134
[19]	Corona-Avendaño S., Ramírez-Silva M. T., Romero-Romo M., Rojas-Hernández A., Palomar-Pardavé M., Electrochim. Acta,2013, 89, 854-860
[20]	Zhao Y., Huang Y., Zhu H., Zhu Q., Xia Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138(51), 16645-16654
[21]	Fraschini C., Vignon M. R., Carbohyd. Res., 2000, 328(4), 585-589
[22]	Liu Y. R., Zhu L. L., Hu Y., Peng X. S., Du J. Y., Food. Chem., 2017, 221, 1128-1134
[23]	Ates S., Zor E., Akin I., Bingol H., Alpaydin S., Akgemci E. G., Anal. Chim. Acta,2017, 970, 30-37
[24]	Jung I., Pelton M., Piner R., Dikin D. A., Stankovich S., Watcharotone S., Hausner M., Ruoff R. S., Nano. Lett.,2007, 7(12), 3569-3575
[25]	Ding S., Cao S., Zhu A., Shi G., Anal. Chem., 2016, 88(24), 12219-12226
[26]	Tian F., Mou S. F., J. North Univ. China(Natural Science Edition), 2010, 31(5), 499-503
	(田芳, 牟善峰. 中北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 31(5), 499-503)
[27]	Liao H., Zhang Z., Nie L., Yao S., J. Biochem. Bioph. Meth., 2004, 59(1), 75-87
[28]	Liu C., Li B., Xu C., Microchim. Acta,2014, 181(11/12), 1407-1413