镍铁水滑石/还原氧化石墨烯的制备及电催化水氧化性能

doi:10.7503/cjcu20160173

高等学校化学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 1415.doi: 10.7503/cjcu20160173

镍铁水滑石/还原氧化石墨烯的制备及电催化水氧化性能

杜世超¹, 任志宇²(), 吴君², 付宏刚²()

1. 吉林大学理论化学研究所, 长春 130023
2. 黑龙江大学功能无机材料教育部重点实验室, 化学化工与材料学院, 哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2016-03-23 出版日期:2016-07-14 发布日期:2016-07-14
作者简介:
联系人简介: 付宏刚, 男, 博士, 教授, 主要从事应用化学和无机化学学科中的材料结构理论、晶态半导体材料、介孔材料及碳材料的合成与性能研究. E-mail: fuhg@vip.sina.com。任志宇, 女, 博士, 教授, 主要从事纳米复合材料的设计合成、结构调控、材料改性与电催化、光催化及生物检测性质之间关系的研究. E-mail: zyren@hlju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(批准号: 21371053, 21573062)和黑龙江省自然科学基金(批准号: QC2013C009)资助

Ni-Fe LDH/Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction

DU Shichao¹, REN Zhiyu^2,^*(), WU Jun², FU Honggang^2,^*()

1. Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130023, China
2. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry, Ministry of Education of China,School of Chemistry and Materials, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China

Received:2016-03-23 Online:2016-07-14 Published:2016-07-14
Contact: REN Zhiyu,FU Honggang E-mail:zyren@hlju.edu.cn;fuhg@vip.sina.com
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.21371053, 21573062) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China(No.QC2013C009)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

首先制备了不同镍/铁比的镍铁水滑石, 并通过液相剥离法得到水滑石纳米薄片溶胶, 随后将其与还原氧化石墨烯复合, 并对其进行了电催化水氧化的性能测试. 结果表明, 镍铁水滑石的剥离可以大幅度提高其电催化性能, 起峰电位为1.47 V, 电流密度为10 mA/cm² 时, 电位仅为1.53 V; 与还原氧化石墨烯复合后, 其催化活性得到了进一步提高, 在10 mA/cm²时电位降为 1.515 V.

关键词: 镍铁水滑石, 电催化水制氧, 分解水, 还原氧化石墨

Abstract:

The composites of Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide(LDH) and reduced graphene oxide(rGO) were successfully prepared via a simple exfoliation and electrostatic self-assembly and were used as catalysts for electrooxidation of water(oxygen evolution reaction, OER). The exfoliated Ni-Fe LDH samples exhibited much higher water oxidation activity than the bulk ones. The onset potential was 1.470 V vs. RHE and the potential for maintaining a current density of 10 mA/cm² was 1.530 V vs. RHE. After being fabricated with rGO, the composite showed better performance for water oxidation than exfoliated Ni-Fe LDH, and the potential for maintaining a current density of 10 mA/cm² was decreased to 1.515 V vs. RHE.

Key words: Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide(LDH), Oxygen evolution reaction, Water-splitting, Reduced graphene oxide(rGO)

中图分类号:

O614
O646

TrendMD:

杜世超, 任志宇, 吴君, 付宏刚. 镍铁水滑石/还原氧化石墨烯的制备及电催化水氧化性能. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(8): 1415.

DU Shichao,REN Zhiyu,WU Jun,FU Honggang. Ni-Fe LDH/Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2016, 37(8): 1415.

图/表 8

Fig.1 XRD patterns of Ni-Fe(1∶2) LDH(a), Ni-Fe(1∶1) LDH(b), Ni-Fe(2∶1) LDH(c), Ni-Fe(5∶1) LDH(d), Ni-Fe(10∶1) LDH(e) and β-Ni(OH)2(f)

Fig.2 Photos of colloidal solutions of exfoliated nanosheets Tyndall effect was visible when irradiated with a laserbeam. a. Ni-Fe(1∶2) LDH; b. Ni-Fe(1∶1) LDH; c. Ni-Fe(2∶1) LDH; d. Ni-Fe(5∶1) LDH; e. Ni-Fe(10∶1) LDH; f. Ni(OH)2.

Fig.3 Zeta potential(A) and TEM image(B) of Ni-Fe(10∶1) LDH The inset in (A) shows the corresponding particle size distribution.

Fig.4 Typical TEM(A, B) and HRTEM(C, D) images of the exfoliated Ni-Fe(5∶1) LDH/rGO composite (B) is the amplification image of the corresponding dotted box in (A); (C) and (D) are the amplification images of the corresponding dotted box in (B).

Fig.5 TG curves of the exfoliated Ni-Fe(5∶1)LDH/rGO composite measured under N2(a) or air(b) atomosphere

Fig.6 Polarization curves of bulk(a) and exfoliated(b) Ni-Fe(10∶1) LDH(A) and exfoliated Ni-Fe(1∶2) LDH(a), Ni-Fe(1∶1) LDH(b), Ni-Fe(2∶1) LDH(c), Ni-Fe(5∶1) LDH(d), Ni-Fe(10∶1) LDH(e), Ni(OH)2(f)(B) in 1 mol/L KOH

Fig.7 Polarization curves(A) and chronopotentiometry(B) of exfoliated Ni-Fe(10∶1) LDH(a) and NiFe(10∶1) LDH/rGO(b) The inset in (A) shows the Tafel plots; the inset in (B) shows the electrochemical impedance spectra.

Table 1 Comparison of catalytic performance of exfoliated Ni-Fe LDH/rGO to Fe,Ni-based LDHs and oxides

Material	Onset potential/ V(vs. RHE)	Potential at 10 mA·cm^-2/ V(vs. RHE)	Slope of Tafel plot/ (mV·dec^-1)	Ref.
NiFe LDH/CNT	1.500		35	[5]
Exfoliated NiFe LDH	1.493	1.532	40	[16]
NiCo LDH/CP^*	1.535	1.597	40	[17]
NG-NiCo LDH	1.580		614	[20]
CoNi LDH	1.590			[21]
NiCo LDH/Ni foam	1.520	1.650	113	[22]
Ni_2/3Fe_1/3-rGO	1.440	1.470	40	[23]
NiCo₂O₄ nanosheets	1.550		30	[24]
Ni_0.6Co_2.4O₄/Ni foil	1.570	1.760		[25]
Ni-NG	1.550		188	[26]
Exfoliated Ni-Fe LDH	1.470	1.530	108	This work
Exfoliated Ni-Fe LDH/rGO	1.470	1.515	85	This work

参考文献 26

[1]	Lewis N., S. , Nocera D., G. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2006, 103( 43), 15729- 15735
[2]	Jiao, Y. , Zheng, Y. , Jaroniec, M. , Qiao S., Z. , Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 2060- 2086 doi: 10.1039/c4cs00470a URL pmid: 25672249
[3]	Wang, H. , Dai, H. , Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 3088- 3113 doi: 10.1021/ja3089923 URL
[4]	Kanan M., W. , Nocera D., G. , Science, 2008, 321, 1072- 1075
[5]	McCrory C. C., L. , Jung, S. , Peters J., C. , Jaramillo T., F. , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135( 45), 16977- 16987 doi: 10.1021/ja407115p URL pmid: 24171402
[6]	Trotochaud, L. , Ranney J., K. , Williams K., N. , Boettcher S., W. , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 17253- 17261 doi: 10.1021/ja307507a URL pmid: 22991896
[7]	张艳梅, 张静, 李晓芳, 储刚, 田苗苗, 权春善. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37( 3), 573- 580 doi: 10.7503/cjcu20150511 URL
	Zhang Y., M. , Zhang, J. , Li X., F. , Chu, G. , Tian M., M. , Quan C., S. , Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2016, 37( 3), 573- 580 ( doi: 10.7503/cjcu20150511 URL
[8]	郭亚军, 张龙, 后洁琼, 马泳波, 秋虎, 张文娟, 杜雪岩. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37( 6), 1202- 1207 doi: 10.7503/cjcu20150965 URL
	Guo Y., J. , Zhang, L. , Hou J., Q. , Ma Y., B. , Qiu, H. , Zhang W., J. , Du X., Y. , Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2016, 37( 6), 1202- 1207 ( doi: 10.7503/cjcu20150965 URL
[9]	Seiger H., N. , Shair R., C. , J. Electrochem. Soc., 1961, 108( 2), 163- 167
[10]	Corrigan D., A. , J. Electrochem. Soc., 1987, 13( 24), 377- 384 doi: 10.1149/1.2100463 URL
[11]	Bowen C., T. , Davis H., J. , Henshaw B., F. , Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 1984, 9( 1/2), 59- 66 doi: 10.1016/0360-3199(84)90032-6 URL
[12]	Wang, Q. , O’, Hare D. , Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 4124- 4155 doi: 10.1021/cr200434v URL pmid: 22452296
[13]	Song, F. , Hu, X. , Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 4477- 4486 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5477 URL pmid: 25030209
[14]	Luo, J. , Im J., H. , Mayer M., T. , Schreier, M. , Nazeeruddin M., K. , Park N., G. , Tilley S., D. , Fan H., J. , Graetzel, M. , Science, 2014, 345( 6024), 1593- 1596 doi: 10.1126/science.1258307 URL pmid: 25258076
[15]	Wang, Y. , Li, F. , Dong, S. , J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2016, 467, 28- 34
[16]	Butler S., Z. , Shawna M., H. , Linyou, C. , ACS Nano, 2013, 7( 4), 2898- 2926 doi: 10.1021/nn401053g URL pmid: 23590723
[17]	Liang, H. , Meng, F. , Acevedo M., C. , Li, L. , Forticaux, A. , Xiu, L. , Wang, Z. , Jin, S. , Nano Lett., 2015, 15( 2), 1421- 1427 doi: 10.1021/nl504872s URL pmid: 25633476
[18]	Liu, X. , Wang, X. , Yuan, X. , Donga, W. , Huang, F. , J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 167- 172
[19]	Wang H., L. , Robinson J., T. , Li X., L. , Dai H., J. , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9910- 9911 doi: 10.1021/ja904251p URL pmid: 19580268
[20]	Chen, S. , Duan J., J. , Jaroniec, M. , Qiao S., Z. , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52( 51), 13567- 13570 doi: 10.1002/anie.201306166 URL pmid: 24346940
[21]	Valdez, R. , Grotjahn D., B. , Smith D., K. , Quintana J., M. , Olivas, A. , Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2015, 10, 909- 918
[22]	Jiang, J. , Zhang A., L. , Li L., L. , Ai L., H. , J. Power Sources, 2015, 278, 445- 451 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.085 URL
[23]	Ma, W. , Ma R., Z. , Wang C., X. , Liang J., B. , Liu X., H. , Zhou K., C. , Sasaki, T. , ACS Nano, 2015, 9( 2), 1977- 1984 doi: 10.1021/nn5069836 URL pmid: 25605063
[24]	Bao, J. , Zhang X., D. , Fan, B. , Zhang J., J. , Zhou, M. , Yang W., L. , Hu, X. , Wang, H. , Pan B., C. , Xie, Y. , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 7399- 7404
[25]	Lambert T., N. , Vigil J., A. , White S., E. , Davis D., J. , Limmer S., J. , Burton P., D. , Coker E., N. , Beecheme T., E. , Brumbach M., T. , Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 9511- 9514
[26]	Chen, S. , Duan J., J. , Ran J., R. , Jaroniecb, M. , Qiao S., Z. , Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3693- 3699

镍铁水滑石/还原氧化石墨烯的制备及电催化水氧化性能

Ni-Fe LDH/Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王雪丽, 宋相伟, 解颜宁, 杜妮阳, 王振新. 部分还原氧化石墨烯的制备、表征及对人宫颈癌HeLa细胞的体外杀伤作用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(2): 20210595.
[2]	唐定, 衷水平. Bi_1-_xFe_xVO₄薄膜光阳极的制备及光电化学性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(8): 2509.
[3]	苗伟俊, 吴锋, 王勇, 王宗宝. 高剪切速率对PCL/RGO附生结晶行为影响的原位研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(3): 910.
[4]	黄东雪, 章颖, 曾婷, 张媛媛, 万其进, 杨年俊. 基于过渡金属硫化物/还原氧化石墨烯复合物的高性能超级电容器[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(2): 643.
[5]	陈砚田, 郄晗彤, 张胤杰, 周彩吉, 谭笑, 林爱军. 还原氧化石墨烯负载零价铁的合成及对TNT废水处理[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(8): 1836.
[6]	关芳兰,李昕,张群,龚,林紫钰,陈耀,王乐军. 激光直写微型RGO/MWCNT/CF平面柔性超级电容器的制备及性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(2): 300.
[7]	李龙, 胡红利, 丁书江. 鳞状CoMn₂O₄/石墨烯复合材料的制备及在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(9): 2010.
[8]	孙兵, 蒋尚, 王润伟, 倪玲, 裘式纶, 张宗弢. 高性能钛酸锂/还原氧化石墨烯复合负极材料的合成与应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(12): 2767.
[9]	邱丽娟, 张颖, 刘帅卓, 张骞, 周莹. 超疏水、高强度石墨烯油水分离材料的制备及应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(12): 2758.
[10]	王雪丽, 王振新. 基于部分还原氧化石墨烯纳米复合材料的肿瘤靶向光动力-光热联合治疗剂的制备[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(10): 2185.
[11]	布林朝克, 郭婷, 张邦文, 戴志安, 俞慧涛, 邢瑞光, 资卢雄. 部分还原氧化石墨烯-Fe₃O₄对水中Mn(Ⅱ)的快速去除[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(2): 217.
[12]	冯晓磊, 曲宗凯, 陈俊, 王登登, 陈旭, 杨文胜. NiFe₂O₄/NiO纳米复合材料的制备及电催化水氧化性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(11): 1999.
[13]	付蓉蓉, 罗民, 马永华, 杨顺. Ni₃(HCOO)₆/还原氧化石墨烯复合电极材料的制备及电容性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(8): 1485.
[14]	赵小龙, 孙红娟, 彭同江. 对苯二胺功能化还原氧化石墨烯的结构和官能团变化[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(4): 728.
[15]	季津海, 闻雪梅, 陈洋, 毕宴钢. 还原氧化石墨烯/Au复合微电极阵列的制备及光电特性[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(10): 1826.