Preparation of InN-In2O3 Nanocomposite with Bottle-shaped Structure and Its Enhanced Formaldehyde Gas Sensitivity

doi:10.7503/cjcu20200336

Abstract

Abstract:

The In₂O₃ nano-powder was prepared by sol-gel method， and by reacting with NH₃， the interme- diate product InN base material was obtained， then the InN-In₂O₃ nanocomposite was obtained through the in?situ oxidation process， and characterized by means of XRD（X-ray differaction）， SEM（scanning electron microscopy）， TEM（transmission electron microscopy） and XPS（X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy）. The bottle-shaped nanocomposite was then equipped with a micro-chip sensor chip working platform. The results show that at a lower operating temperature（75 ℃）， the detection limit for formaldehyde gas can be as low as ppb（0.13 mg/m³or 100 ppb）， with higher sensitivity（12）， shorter response time（2 s）， selectivity and stability. In the test of the influence of humidity on the sensitivity of the sensor， due to the water-soluble characteristics of formaldehyde， the sensitivity of the sensor changes with the change of humidity. This change is great when the concentration of formaldehyde is low， but small when the concentration of formaldehyde is high.

Key words: InN-In₂O₃, Sensor, Composite material, Formaldehyde

CLC Number:

O649

TrendMD:

NING Qiuyang, FENG Wei, WU Guoguang. Preparation of InN-In₂O₃ Nanocomposite with Bottle-shaped Structure and Its Enhanced Formaldehyde Gas Sensitivity[J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2020, 41(12): 2804.

Figures/Tables 12

References 31

1	Wang H.， Jia W.， Sun H. H.， Li X.， Yunnan Chem.Tech.， 2019， 46（10）， 104—106
2	Jaballah S.， Benamara M.， DahmanH.， Lahem D.， Debliquy M.， Mir L. E.， J. Mater. Sci.： Mater. Electron.， 2020， 31， 8230—8239
3	Nadalutti C. A.， Stefanick D. F.， Zhao M. L.， Horton J. K.， Wilson S. H.， Sci. Report.， 2020， 10（1）， 5575—5577
4	Gao H. Y.， Wang J. Y.， Zhao Y. N.， Chen K. F.， Xue D. F.， Chem. J. Chinese Universities， 2017， 38（12）， 2206—2212（高海燕，王竞一，赵永男，陈昆峰，薛冬峰. 高等学校化学学报， 2017， 38（12）， 2206—2212）
5	Jiang Y. P.， Liu Y.， Chen M. J.， Li M. F.， Inter. J. Enviro. Sci. Tec.， 2017， 14（7）， 1469—1472
6	Chauhan R. S.， Kumar A.， Prabhu P.， Inorg. Chim. Acta， 2019， 487， 395—397
7	Wang M.， Li X. W.， Shao C. L.， Zhao Y. Q.， Xin J. Y.， Han Z. H.， Li X. H.， Liu Y. C.， Chem. J. Chinese Universities， 2017， 38（9）， 1524—1530（王茉，李晓伟，邵长路，赵英倩，辛佳玉，韩朝翰，李兴华，刘益春. 高等学校化学学报， 2017， 38（9）， l524—1530）
8	Xu J. B.， Wang W.， Wang C.， Chem. J. Chinese Universities， 2017， 38（6）， 942—946（许金宝，王威，王策. 高等学校化学学报， 2017， 38（6）， 942—946）
9	Chen R. S.， Wang J.， Xia Y.， Xiang L.， Sens. Actuators Chem.， 2018， 255（2）， 2538—2545
10	Capra P. P.， Galliana F.， Latino M.， Bonavita A.， Donato N.， Neri G.， Lec. Note. Electr. Engine.， 2014， 268， 149—154
11	Shlimak I.， Ginodman V.， Gerber A. B.， Milner A.， Friedland K. J.， Paul D. J.， Europhys. Lett.， 2005， 69（6）， 143—147
12	Pearton S. J.， Ren F.， Wang Y. L.， ChuB. H.， Chen K. H.， Chang C. Y.， Lima W.， Lin J.， Nortona D. P.， Pro. Mater. Sci.， 2010， 55（1）， 1—59
13	Yue H.， Wang X.， Guo X.， Wang G.， Liu L.， Micro Nano Lett.， 2016， 11（12）， 825—827
14	Wei D. D.， Huang Z. S.， Wang L. W.， Chuai X. H.， Zhang S. M.， Lu G. Y.， Sens. Actuators B， 2018， 255（2）， 1211—1219
15	Yang H. Y.， Zhang X. C.， Tang A. D.， Mater. Chem. Phys.， 2004， 86， 330—332
16	Chen C.， Chen D.， Jiao X.， Wang C.， Chem. Commun.， 2006， 4632—4634
17	Jahangir’ Ifat W.， Alina U.， Md. A. C.， Koley M. V. S.， Goutam， 2016 IEEE Sens.， 2016， 1—3
18	Gao L.， Zhang Q.， Li J.， J. Mater. Chem.， 2003， 13（1）， 154—158
19	Luo S.， Zhou W.， Zhang Z.， Dou X.， Liu L.， Zhao X.， Liu D. F.， Song L.， Xiang Y. J.， Zhou J. J.， Xie S. S.， Chem. Phys. Lett.， 2005， 411（4—6）， 361—365
20	Wang F.， Xue C.， Zhuang H.， Zhang X.， Ai Y.， Sun L.， Yang Z.， Zhu L. H.， Phys. E， 2008， 40（3）， 664—667
21	Kittappa S.， Jang M.， Ramalingam M.， Ibrahim S.， J. Environ. Chem. Eng.， 2020， 8（4）， 103839
22	Dong J. L.， Zhu J. J.， Yan R.， Zheng J. L.， Chen Y. P.， Gao L. P.， J. Ceramics， 2020， 41（1）， 35—41
23	Cao J.， Dou H.， Zhang H.， Mei H.， Liu S.， Fei T.， Wang R.， Wang L.， Zhang T.， Sens. Actuators B， 2014， 180—187
24	Yang H.， Wang S.， Yang Y.， CrystEngComm， 2012， 14（3）， 1135—1142
25	Wang J.， Zou B.， Ruan S.， Zhao J.， Chen Q.， Wu F.， Mater. Lett.， 2009， 63， 1750—1753
26	Du H.， Wang J.， Su M.， Yao P.， Zheng Y.， Yu N.， Sens. Actuators B， 2012， 746—752
27	Ma L.， Fan H.， Tian H.， Fang J.， Qian X.， Sens. Actuators B， 2016， 222（1）， 508—516
28	Huang F.， Shu S. M.， Liu L. Y.， Liu S. T.， J. Wuhan Ins. Tec.， 2016， 38（6）， 538—543
29	Aliano A.， Cicero G.， Catellani A.， ACS Appl.Mater.， 2015， 7， 5415—5419
30	Yuan W.， Liu A.， Huang L.， Li C.， Shi G.， Adv. Mater.， 2013， 25， 766—771
31	He Q.， Zeng Z.， Yin Z.， Li H.， Wu S.， Huang X.， Zhang H.， Small， 2012， 8（19）， 2994—2999

Sensing material	Fabrication approch	Morphology	HCHO concentration/ (mg·m^-3)(ppm)	Operating temperature/℃	Sensitivity or response(R_a/R_g)	Response/ Recovery time/s	Ref.
In₂O₃	Hydrothermal	Nanosheet	65(50)	330	8	14/5	[22]
In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanofibers	65(50)	240	11.9	10/15	[23]
Zn?In₂O₃	Hydrothermal	Spindle?like	65(50)	260	14	14/15	[24]
Ag?In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanofibers	65(50)	215	18	11/30	[25]
SnO_2-In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanofibers	65(50)	375	18.9	25/40	[26]
ZnO?In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanoparticles	130(100)	300	46.8	6/7	[27]
In₂O₃	Hydrothermal	Octahedron	13(10)	150	3	16/33	This work
InN?In₂O₃	Chemical synthesis	Bottle shape	0.65(0.5)	75	77	2/12	This work

Sensing material	Fabrication approch	Morphology	HCHO concentration/ (mg·m^-3)(ppm)	Operating temperature/℃	Sensitivity or response(R_a/R_g)	Response/ Recovery time/s	Ref.
In₂O₃	Hydrothermal	Nanosheet	65(50)	330	8	14/5	[22]
In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanofibers	65(50)	240	11.9	10/15	[23]
Zn?In₂O₃	Hydrothermal	Spindle?like	65(50)	260	14	14/15	[24]
Ag?In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanofibers	65(50)	215	18	11/30	[25]
SnO_2-In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanofibers	65(50)	375	18.9	25/40	[26]
ZnO?In₂O₃	Electrospinning	Nanoparticles	130(100)	300	46.8	6/7	[27]
In₂O₃	Hydrothermal	Octahedron	13(10)	150	3	16/33	This work
InN?In₂O₃	Chemical synthesis	Bottle shape	0.65(0.5)	75	77	2/12	This work

[1]	LI Yulong, XIE Fating, GUAN Yan, LIU Jiali, ZHANG Guiqun, YAO Chao, YANG Tong, YANG Yunhui, HU Rong. A Ratiometric Electrochemical Sensor Based on Silver Ion Interaction with DNA for the Detection of Silver Ion [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(8): 20220202.
[2]	WANG Junyang, LIU Zheng, ZHANG Qian, SUN Chunyan, LI Hongxia. Application of DNA Silver Nanoclusters in the Fluorescence Biosensors based on Functional Nucleic Acids [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(6): 20220010.
[3]	LI Shurong, WANG Lin, CHEN Yuzhen, JIANG Hailong. Research Progress of Metal⁃organic Frameworks on Liquid Phase Catalytic Chemical Hydrogen Production [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(1): 20210575.
[4]	WEI Chuangyu, CHEN Yanli, JIANG Jianzhuang. Fabrication of Electrochemical Sensor for Dopamine and Uric Acid Based on a Novel Dimeric Phthalocyanine-involved Quintuple-decker Modified Indium Tin Oxide Electrode [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2022, 43(1): 20210582.
[5]	ZHAO Lingyun, HUANG Hanxiong, LUO Duyu, SU Fengchun. Effect of Flexibility of Composites on Performances of Sensors with Micro-structured Inverted Pyramid Arrays [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(9): 2953.
[6]	PAN Xiaojun, BAO Rongrong, PAN Caofeng. Research Progress of Flexible Tactile Sensors Applied to Wearable Electronics [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(8): 2359.
[7]	HUANG Chibao, KANG Shuai, PAN Qi, LYU Guoling. Carbazole-derived Dicyanostilbene Two-photon Fluorescence Probe for Lipid Raft [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(8): 2443.
[8]	CAI Yaqian, ZHANG Jiahuai, LIU Fangzhe, LI Haichao, SHI Jianping, GUAN Shuang. Protein-based Hydrogel Assisted by Hofmeister Effect for Strain Sensor [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(8): 2609.
[9]	XU Mengyi, HUANG Xuewen, LI Xiaojie, WEI Wei, LIU Xiaoya. Fabrication of Biosensor Based on “Beads-on-a-String” Shaped Composite Nano-assembly Modified Screen Printed Electrode [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(6): 1768.
[10]	WU Yangyi, CHEN Jianping, Ai Yijing, WANG Qingxiang, GAO Fei, GAO Feng. Synthesis of 2-（2-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl）-C₆₀ and Its Application for Sensing of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S Promotor [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(6): 1754.
[11]	YANG Ruiqi, YU Xin, LIU Hong. Scientific Study of Photocatalytic Material Based on Sn₃O₄ [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(5): 1340.
[12]	BA Zhichen, LIANG Daxin, XIE Yanjun. Progress of MXenes Composites： Interface Modification and Structure Design [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(4): 1225.
[13]	ZHANG Shuting, AN Qi. Progress on the Design and Fabrication of High Performance Piezoelectric Flexible Materials Based on Polyvinylidene Fluoride [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(4): 1114.
[14]	WANG Jie, LI Ying, SHAO Liang, BAI Yang, MA Zhonglei, MA Jianzhong. Preparation and Properties of Poly（vinyl alcohol）/polypyrrole Composite Conductive Hydrogel Strain Sensor [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(3): 929.
[15]	SHA Huiwen, MA Weiting, ZHOU Xiaojuan, SONG Weixing. One-step Preparation and Applications of Laser Induced Three-dimensional Reticular Graphene [J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2021, 42(2): 607.

Preparation of InN-In₂O₃ Nanocomposite with Bottle-shaped Structure and Its Enhanced Formaldehyde Gas Sensitivity

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments