Reparation and Photothermal Properties of Prussian Blue Nanoparticles with Different Morphologies†

doi:10.7503/cjcu20170116

Abstract

Abstract:

To clarify the factors that influence photothermal property, prussian blue nanoparticles(PB NPs) with different morphologies, including cube, rectangular cube, sphere, rod, hollow, core-shell, spindle and polyhedron, were synthesized and characterized by the scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and UV-Vis spectrophotometry. The results show that the morphologies of PB NPs were closely related to their photothermal property. And several factors, such as particle size, morphology, structure and the absorption cross-sectional area of particle, could make a huge difference in photothermal property under the same external experiment conditions. In addition, the experimental conditions, such as laser source, laser power density and the concentration of materials, could also play critical roles in photothermal property of PB NPs. Importantly, at the same concentration, the laser power density greatly affected the photothermal property of PB NPs. On the other hand, at the same laser power density, the higher concentration of PB NPs resulted in a better performance of photothermal property.

Key words: Prussian blue nanoparticles, Morphology, Photothermal property, Photothermal therapy

CLC Number:

O644

TrendMD:

ZHANG Shupeng, CHENG Youxing, REN Lei, WEN Kai, LÜ Xiaolin, YE Shefang, ZHOU Xi. Reparation and Photothermal Properties of Prussian Blue Nanoparticles with Different Morphologies^†[J]. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2018, 39(2): 359.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1 SEM(A—D, G, H) and TEM(E, F) images of PB nanoparticles(NPs) with different morphologies(A) Cube; (B) rectangular cube; (C) sphere; (D) rod; (E) core-shell; (F) hollow; (G) spindle; (H) polyhedron.

Fig.2 X-ray powder diffraction patterns of PB NPs with different morphologies

Fig.3 UV-Vis spectra of PB NPs with different morphologies(A) Before normalization; (B)after normalization. a. Polyhedron; b. spindle; c. hollow;d. rectangular cube; e. sphere; f. rod; g. cube; h. core-shere.

Fig.4 Temperature-rising curves of PB NPs under vary conditions(A) Different semiconductor excitation light source; (B)different laser power density; (C) different concentrations of PB NPs.

Table 1 Size, volume, absorption value and molar extinction coefficient of different PB NPs

Morphology	Particle size/nm	10¹⁵ Volume/cm³	10^-13ε_PB	A	10^-13ε
Cube	100(side length)	1	5.418A	0.3475	1.8
Rectangular cube	100	1	5.418A	0.4747	2.57
Sphere	100(diameter)	0.52	2.8A	0.1696	0.47
Rod	3000/200/10(long/wide/high)	6	32.5A	0.3083	10.02
Core-shell	200(length)	8	43.3A	0.5709	24.72
Hollow	100(length)	0.03	0.1A	0.0719	0.01
Spindle	500(long axis)	5.45	29.5A	0.1503	4.43
Polyhedron	250(hexagon length)	40.6	219.7A	0.4350	95.57

Fig.5 Rising curve of vary morphology at the same concentration(A), thermal infrared image at different time point(B) and absorption cross-sectional area of particle(C)a. H2O; b. cube; c. polyhedron; d. hollow; e. spindle; f. rectangular cube; g. sphere; h. rod; i. core-shell.

Table 2 Specific value of PB NPs with different morphologies

Sample	A₈₀₈	ΔT_max/℃	1 $0 - A 808$	1-1 $0 - A 808$	η
Cube	0.93	22.70	0.12	0.88	25.8/K-1.14
Rectangular cube	0.53	16.90	0.29	0.71	23.8/K-1.41
Sphere	0.92	10.30	0.12	0.88	11.7/K-1.14
Rod	0.94	19.50	0.11	0.89	21.9/K-1.12
Core-shell	0.95	5.40	0.11	0.89	6.07/K-1.12
Hollow	0.82	5.30	0.15	0.85	6.2/K-1.25
Spindle	0.52	5.60	0.30	0.70	8/K-1.43
Polyhedron	0.96	16.50	0.11	0.89	18.54/K-1.12

Table 2 Specific value of PB NPs with different morphologies

Sample	A₈₀₈	ΔT_max/℃	1 $0 - A 808$	1-1 $0 - A 808$	η
Cube	0.93	22.70	0.12	0.88	25.8/K-1.14
Rectangular cube	0.53	16.90	0.29	0.71	23.8/K-1.41
Sphere	0.92	10.30	0.12	0.88	11.7/K-1.14
Rod	0.94	19.50	0.11	0.89	21.9/K-1.12
Core-shell	0.95	5.40	0.11	0.89	6.07/K-1.12
Hollow	0.82	5.30	0.15	0.85	6.2/K-1.25
Spindle	0.52	5.60	0.30	0.70	8/K-1.43
Polyhedron	0.96	16.50	0.11	0.89	18.54/K-1.12

References 32

[1]	Jaque D., Maestro L. M., Del Rosal B., Haro-Gonzalez P., Benayas A., Plaza J. L., Martin E. R., Sole J. G., Nanoscale,2014, 6(16), 9494—9530
[2]	Liu Z., Macharia D. K., Chen W., Yu N., Yang C., Hu J., Chen Z., Rev. Nanosci. Nanotech., 2016, 5(2), 93—118
[3]	Liu H., Chen D., Li L., Liu T., Tan L., Wu X., Tang F., Angew. Chem., 2011, 123(4), 921—925
[4]	Robinson J. T., Tabakman S. M., Liang Y., Wang H., Sanchez C. H., Vinh D., Dai H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133(17), 6825—6831
[5]	Kam N. W. S., O'Connell M., Wisdom J. A., Dai H., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2005, 102(33), 11600—11605
[6]	Zhang C., Fu Y. Y., Zhang X., Yu C., Zhao Y., Sun S. K., Dalton Trans., 2015, 44(29), 13112—13118
[7]	Fu G., Liu W., Feng S., Yue X., Chem. Commun., 2012, 48(94), 11567—11569
[8]	Shokouhimehr M., Soehnlen E. S., Hao J., Griswold M., Flask C., Fan X., Basilion J. P., Basu S., Huang S. D., J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20(25), 5251—5259
[9]	Cao L., Liu Y., Zhang B., Lu L., ACS Appl. Mater. Interf., 2010, 2(8), 2339—2346
[10]	Al Hammouri. F., Darwazeh G., Said A., Ghosh R. A., J. Med. Toxicol., 2011, 7(4), 306—311
[11]	Cai X., Gao W., Ma M., Wu M., Zhang L., Zheng Y., Chen H., Shi J., Adv. Mater., 2015, 27(41), 6536—6536
[12]	Han L. H., Li K. F., Chen Y. W., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2017, 38(5), 706—712
	(韩林唤, 李凯丰, 陈艳伟. 高等学校化学学报, 2017,38(5), 706—712)
[13]	Xiao Z., Ye G., Liu Y., Chen S., Peng Q., Zuo Q., Ding L., Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed., 2012, 51(36), 9038—9041
[14]	Zhang L.Y., Chi Y.N., Shan G.Y., Chen Y.W., Liu N., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2016, 37(7), 1239—1244
	(张龄月, 迟娅楠, 单桂晔, 陈艳伟, 刘娜. 高等学校化学学报, 2016,37(7), 1239—1244)
[15]	Dong S., Chen X., Zhang X., Cui G., Coord. Chem. Rev., 2013, 257(13), 1946—1956
[16]	Jacques S. L., Phy. Med. Biol., 2013, 58(11), 5007—5008
[17]	Tian Q., Jiang F., Zou R., Liu Q., Chen Z., Zhu M., Yang S., Wang J., Hu J., ACS Nano, 2011, 5(12), 9761—9771
[18]	Zarrouk S. J., Moon H., Geothermics,2014, 51, 142—153
[19]	Gallo A. B., Simes-Moreira J. R., Costa H. K. M., Santos M. M., Dos Santos E. M., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2016, 65, 800—822
[20]	Hou W., Cronin S. B., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23(13), 1612—1619
[21]	Homola J., Yee S. S., Gauglitz G., Sens. Actuat. B: Chem., 1999, 54(1), 3—15
[22]	Cao J., Sun T., Grattan K. T., Sens. Actuat. B: Chem., 2014, 195, 332—351
[23]	Wong C. L., Olivo M., Plasmonics,2014, 9(4), 809—824
[24]	Wu P., Han Y. P., Liu D. F., Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 32(6), 2676—2679
	(吴鹏, 韩一平, 刘德芳. 物理学报, 2005,32(6), 2676—2679)
[25]	Ghosh S. K., Pal T., Chem. Rev., 2007, 107(11), 4797—4862
[26]	Nehl C. L., Hafner J. H., J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18(21), 2415—2419
[27]	Couture M, Zhao S. S., Masson J. F., Chem. Chem., 2013, 15(27), 11190—11216
[28]	Kochuveedu S. T., Kim D. H., Nanoscale,2014, 6(10), 4966—4984
[29]	Cobley C. M., Campbell D. J., Xia Y., Adv. Mater., 2008, 20(4), 748—752
[30]	Eustis S., El-Sayed M. A., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35(3), 209—217
[31]	Shi F., Fang H., Xu W., Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2016, 32(1), 28—34
[32]	Kong C., Han Y. X., Hou L. J., Chen D. P., Wu B. W., Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2017, 33(5), 816—821