量子点自修饰TiO2p-n同质结的构建及光催化性能

doi:10.7503/cjcu20200107

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在n型TiO₂纳米片表面原位沉积p型TiO₂量子点构建了量子点自修饰的TiO₂ p-n同质结(PNT-x), 并利用透射电子显微镜(TEM)、 X射线衍射(XRD)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、 X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、稳态荧光光谱(PL)、拉曼光谱(Raman)、紫外-可见漫反射光谱(UV-Vis DRS)、电化学测试及电化学交流阻抗谱(EIS)对复合物的组成、结构和光催化性能进行了表征和研究. 结果表明, PNT-x具有TiO₂量子点自修饰的结构, 量子点和纳米片中分别含有金属缺陷和氧缺陷, 其含量随组成变化可控, 并使得PNT-x表现出p-n同质结的典型特征, 与n-n Ⅱ型同质结以及块状p-n同质结相比, PNT-x中费米能级相差更大, 界面内电场更强, 具有更高的电荷分离和传递效率. 光照下, 样品的光催化活性顺序为PNT-400>p-25>PNT-600>PNT-200>p-TiO₂>n-TiO₂, 其中PNT-400的光催化产氢速率高达41.7 mmol·g^-1·h^-1, 分别为n-TiO₂纳米片、 Ⅱ型同质结和块状p-n同质结的4.3倍、 3.6倍和2.3倍, 并表现出优异的催化稳定性.

关键词: 二氧化钛, p-n同质结, 缺陷调控, 电荷分离, 光催化产氢

Abstract:

Quantum dots(QDs) self-decorated TiO₂ p-n homojunction(PNT-x) samples were fabricated by in-situ depositing p-type TiO₂ QDs on the surface of n-type TiO₂ nanosheets. The composition and structure of the samples were characterized by transmission electron microscopy(TEM), X-ray diffraction(XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS), photoluminescence spectrometry(PL), Raman spectrometry, UV visible diffuse reflectance spectrometry(UV-Vis DRS), photoelectrochemical test and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy(EIS) analyses. The results indicate that PNT-x exhibits TiO₂ QDs self-decorated structure. Meanwhile, there exist metal and oxygen vacancies in QDs and nanosheets, respectively, and the content of vacancies can be modulated by the composition. Therefore, the as-prepared PNT-x show typical characteristics of p-n homojunction, and the difference of Fermi level and internal electrical field is stronger than that in n-n type Ⅱ homojunction and bulk p-n homojunction, thus leading to a significantly high charge separation and transfer efficiency. Under illumination, the order of photocatalytic activity is PNT-400>p-25>PNT-600>PNT-200>p-TiO₂>n-TiO₂, and PNT-400 display the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rate as high as 41.7 mmol·g^-1·h^-1, which is 4.3, 3.6 and 2.3 times that of n-TiO₂ nanosheets, type Ⅱ homojunction and bulk p-n homojunction, respectively, as well as a good catalytic stability.

Key words: TiO₂, p-n Homojunction, Defect modulation, Charge separation, Photocatalytic H₂ evolution

中图分类号:

O643.3

TrendMD:

王非凡, 王松博, 姚柯奕, 张蕾, 杜威, 程鹏高, 张建平, 唐娜. 量子点自修饰TiO₂p-n同质结的构建及光催化性能. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(7): 1615.

WANG Feifan, WANG Songbo, YAO Keyi, ZHANG Lei, DU Wei, CHENG Penggao, ZHANG Jianping, TANG Na. Construction and Photocatalytic Performance of Quantum Dots Self-decorated TiO₂ p-n Homojunction^†. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2020, 41(7): 1615.

图/表 11

Scheme 1 Fabrication procedures of n-TiO2 and TiO2 p-n homojunctions

Fig.1 XRD patterns(A) and FTIR spectra(B) of n-TiO2(a), GNT-200(b), GNT-400(c), GNT-600(d) and TiGly(e)

Fig.2 XRD patterns(A) and FTIR spectra(B) of n-TiO2(a), PNT-200(b), PNT-400(c), PNT-600(d) and p-TiO2(e)

Fig.3 TEM images of n-TiO2(A), PNT-200(B), PNT-400(D), PNT-600(E) and HRTEM image of PNT-400(C)

Fig.4 TG profile of n-TiO2(a), GNT-200(b), GNT-400(c), GNT-600(d) and TiGly(e)

Fig.5 UV-Vis DRS spectra(A) and XPS valence-band spectra(B) of n-TiO2(a), PNT-200(b), PNT-400(c), PNT-600(d) and p-TiO2(e) Inset in (A): the corresponding plots of transformed Kubelka-Munk function vs. the photoenergy.

Fig.6 Raman spectra(A) and enlarged spectra between 100—220 cm-1(B) of n-TiO2(a), PNT-200(b), PNT-400(c), PNT-600(d) and p-TiO2(e)

Fig.7 Ti2p XPS spectra of p-TiO2(A), n-TiO2(B), PNT-200(C), PNT-400(D), PNT-600(E) and O1s XPS spectra(F) of n-TiO2(a), PNT-200(b), PNT-400(c), PNT-600(d), and p-TiO2(e)

Fig.8 Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance of the as-prepared samples (A) Photodegradation rates of phenol and MO. a. PNT-200, b. PNT-400, c. PNT-600, d. p-TiO2, e. n-TiO2, f. NNT-400, g. BPNT-400, h. P25; (B) time course of photocatalytic H2 evolution; (C) linear sweep voltammetry(LSV) curves; (D) recycling of H2 evolution using PNT-400.

Fig.9 Steady-state photo-luminance spectra(A) and Nyquist plots(B) of n-TiO2(a), PNT-200(b), PNT-400(c), PNT-600(d) and p-TiO2 (e) Inset in (B): enlarged EIS plots of PNT-400.

Scheme 2 Schematic illustration of QDs self-decorated TiO2 p-n homojunction and the facilitated charge transfer and separation across the interface

参考文献 43

[1]	Wang S. B., Guan B. Y., Wen X., Lou D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(15), 5037—5040 URL pmid: 29590754
[2]	Chen F., Huang H. W., Ye L. Q., Zhang T. R., Zhang Y. H., Han X. P., Ma T. Y., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28(46), 1804284 doi: 10.1002/adfm.v28.46 URL
[3]	Yu H. J., Li J. Y., Zhang Y. H., Yang S. Q., Han K. L., Dong F., Ma T. Y., Huang H. W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 58(12), 3880—3884
[4]	Kar P., Zeng Z., Zhang Y., Vahidzadeh E., Manuel A., Kisslinger R., Alam M. K Thakur K. U., Mahdi N., Kumar P., Shankar K., Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 243, 522—536
[5]	Dahl M., Liu Y. D., Yin Y. D., Chem. Rev., 2014, 114(19), 9853—9889 doi: 10.1021/cr400634p URL pmid: 25011918
[6]	Chen C. C., Ma W. H., Zhao J. C., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39(11) 4206—4219 URL pmid: 20852775
[7]	Zhu Q., Peng Y., Lin L., Fan C. M Gao G. Q., Wang R. X., Xu A. W., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2(12), 4429—4437
[8]	Liu C., Liu L. L., Nie J. H., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2018, 39(7), 1511—1517
	( 刘翀, 刘丽来, 聂佳慧. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(7), 1511—1517)
[9]	Dahl M., Liu Y. D., Yin Y. D., Chem. Rev., 2014, 114(19), 9853—9889 URL pmid: 25011918
[10]	Teng X. G., Yang R. C., Ren C., CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(11), 4414—4422
	( 滕雪刚, 杨仁春, 任超. 化工学报, 2017, 68(11), 4414—4422)
[11]	Fujishima A., Honda K., Nature, 1972, 238(37), 37—38
[12]	Pan X. Y., Yang M. Q., Fu X. Z., Zhang N., Xu Y. J., Nanoscale, 2013, 5(9), 3601—3614 URL pmid: 23532413
[13]	Thompson L. T., Yates T. J., Chem. Rev., 2006, 106(10), 4428—4453 URL pmid: 17031993
[14]	Chen X. B., Li C., Grätzel M., Kostecki R., Mao S. S., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41(23), 7909—7937
[15]	Ji T. H., Liu Y., Dong L. Y., Han P., Sun J. Y., Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2012, 28(4), 721—726
[16]	Yang H. G., Sun C. H., Qiao S. Z., Zou J., Liu G., Smith C. S., Cheng H. M., Lu G. Q., Nature, 2008, 453(7195), 638—641 doi: 10.1038/nature06964 URL pmid: 18509440
[17]	Yang H. G., Liu G., Qiao S. Z., Sun C. H., Jin Y. G., Smith C. S., Zou J., Cheng H. M., Liu G. Q., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(11), 4078—4083
[18]	Pan L., Zou J. J., Wang S. B., Huang Z. F., Yu A., Wang L., Zhang X. W., Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6593—6595
[19]	Wu W. B., Li J., Liu C. M., Zhan L., Dai H. Q., Liu W., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2017, 38(6), 1082—1089
	( 吴伟兵, 李建, 刘聪敏, 张磊, 戴红旗, 刘伟. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(6), 1082—1089)
[20]	Wang S. B., Pan L., Song J. J., Mi W. B., Zou J. J., Wang L., Zhang X. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(8), 2975—2983
[21]	Zeng X. X., Gong X. F., Wan Y. Q., He R. Y., Xu Z. D., Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2018, 34(5), 711—718
[22]	Liu H., Ma H. T., Li X. Z., Wu M., Bao X. H., Chemosphere, 2003, 50(1), 39—46 URL pmid: 12656227
[23]	Gao G. Q., Zhu Q., Chong H. B., Zhang J., Fan C. M., Li G., Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2018, 34(2), 158—163 doi: 10.1007/s40242-018-7369-x URL
[24]	Pan L., Shen G. Q., Zhang J. W., Wei X. C., Wang L., Zou J. J., Zhang X. W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2015, 54(29), 7226—7232
[25]	Chen K. L., Huang J. H., CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(1), 397—408
	( 陈克龙, 黄建花. 化工学报, 2020, 71(1), 397—408)
[26]	Wang S. B., Wang F. F., Su Z. M., Wang X. N., Han Y. C., Zhang L., Xiang J., Du W., Tang N., Catalysts, 2019, 9(5), 439
[27]	Wu S. M., Liu X. L., Lian X. L., Tian G., Janiak C., Zhang Y. X., Liu Y., Yu H. Z., Hu J., Wei H., Zhao H., Chang G. G., Tendeloo V. G., Wang L. Y., Yang X. Y., Su B. L., Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(32), 1802173
[28]	Lo S. S., Mirkovic T., Chuang C. H., Burda C., Scholes D. G., Adv. Mater., 2010, 23(2), 180—197 URL pmid: 21069886
[29]	Teranishi T., Sakamoto M., J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2013, 4(17), 2867—2873
[30]	Wang M. Y., Sun L., Lin Z. Q., Cai J. H., Xie K. P., Lin C. J., Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6(4), 1211—1220
[31]	Scanlon D. O., Dunnill C. W., Buckeridge J., Shevlin S. A., Nat. Mater., 2013, 12(9), 798—801 doi: 10.1038/nmat3697 URL pmid: 23832124
[32]	Phattalung N. S., Smith M. F., Kwiseon K., Du M. H., Wei S. H., Zhang S. B., Limpijumnong S., Phys. Rev. B, 2006, 73(12), 125205 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.125205 URL
[33]	Pan L., Wang S. B., Mi W. B., Song J. J., Zou J. J., Wang L., Zhang X. W., Nano Energy, 2014, 9, 71—79 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.06.029 URL
[34]	Pan L., Wang S. B., Xie J. W., Wang L., Zhang X. W., Zou J. J., Nano Energy, 2016, 28, 296—303 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.054 URL
[35]	Das J., Freitas F. S., Evans R. I., Nogueira F. A., Khushalani D., J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20(21), 4425—4431
[36]	Han X. G., Kuang Q., Jin M. S., Xie Z. X., Zheng L. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3152—3153 doi: 10.1021/ja8092373 URL pmid: 19216572
[37]	Wang S. B., Huang C. Y., Pan L., Chen Y., Zhang X. W., Aleem E. F., Zou J. J., Catal. Today, 2019, 335, 151—159 doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.059 URL
[38]	Li K., Gao S. M., Wang Q. Y., Xu H., Wang Z. Y., Huang B. B., Dai Y., Lu J., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface, 2015, 7(17), 9023—9030 doi: 10.1021/am508505n URL
[39]	Salari M., Konstantinov K., Liu H. K., J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21(13), 5128—5133 doi: 10.1039/c0jm04085a URL
[40]	Bassi A. L., Cattaneo D., Russo V., Bottani C. E., J. Appl. Phys., 2005, 98(7), 074305 doi: 10.1063/1.2061894 URL
[41]	Parker J. C., Siegel R. W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 1990, 57(9), 943—945 doi: 10.1063/1.104274 URL
[42]	Cai J. M., Wang Y. T., Zhu Y. M., Wu M. Q., Zhang H., Li X. G., Jiang Z., Meng M., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface, 2015, 7(45), 24987—24992 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b07318 URL
[43]	Wang S. B., Zhang X. W., Li S., Fang Y., Pan L., Zou J. J., J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 331, 235—245 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.049 URL pmid: 28273573

量子点自修饰TiO₂p-n同质结的构建及光催化性能

Construction and Photocatalytic Performance of Quantum Dots Self-decorated TiO₂ p-n Homojunction^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜珊, 申倩倩, 李琦, 贾虎生, 薛晋波. Pd增强缺陷态TiO₂纳米管阵列的光催化产氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(10): 20220206.
[2]	吴启亮, 梅晋豪, 李铮, 范海东, 张彦威. 多种纳米结构Fe掺杂TiO₂光热耦合水分解制氢研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1837.
[3]	徐安琪, 李彬, 杜芳林. 有序介孔TiO₂的合成及光解水产氢应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(4): 978.
[4]	李肖乾, 张华, 路海健, 刘畅, 刘庆龙, 马夏禹, 方媛萍, 梁大鹏. 内部萃取电喷雾电离质谱对二氧化钛纳米线阵列光催化降解罗丹明B反应机理的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(9): 2003.
[5]	吴桐, 丛丽娜, 孙立群, 谢海明. 氧缺位结构介孔二氧化钛/聚乙烯复合隔膜在锂硫电池中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(7): 1661.
[6]	曹锰, 柳阳, 张尚玺, 王振希, 徐胜. 壳聚糖钴配合物的合成及光催化产氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(4): 735.
[7]	欧阳密, 陈璐, 胡旭明, 李裕文, 戴大程, 屠袁波, 白茹, 吕晓静, 张诚. TiO₂-PTPAT纳米核/壳结构复合膜的制备及电致变色性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(12): 2796.
[8]	郑姗, 刘洋, 陈飘飘, 邢怡晨, 黄朝表. 基于PbS QDs/TiO₂ NPs构建新型谷胱甘肽光电化学传感器[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(9): 1866.
[9]	惠龙飞, 李建国, 龚婷, 孙道安, 吕剑, 胡申林, 冯昊. 高长径比管式反应器内壁SiO₂与TiO₂钝化层的原子层沉积制备及抗积碳性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(2): 201.
[10]	孙大伟,李跃军,曹铁平,赵艳辉,杨殿凯. 三维网状Dy ³⁺∶YVO₄/TiO₂复合纤维的制备及光催化产氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(11): 2348.
[11]	梁芷珊, 倪爽, 代梦娇, 韩方杰, 韩立鹏, 牛利, 韩冬雪. 基于g-C₃N₄/P25复合光电敏感体系的中草药抗氧化容量测定[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(10): 2081.
[12]	阿山, 郑家威, 刘聚明, 白杰, 杨桔材, 张前程. 乙酸修饰Ag/TiO₂复合光催化剂的制备及协同催化性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(8): 1450.
[13]	李孝慈, 奚志文, 刘行, 李明, 郝志显, 朱志荣. TiO₂助剂对乙苯脱氢催化剂性能的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(7): 1229.
[14]	杨彩虹, 满春利, 薛琬蕾, 王挺, 陈迪, 陈潜, 吴礼光. 二氧化钛纳米粒子-氧化石墨烯/聚酰亚胺混合基质膜的原位聚合及气体渗透性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(4): 686.
[15]	张春磊, 黄丹娅, 孙明慧, 欧阳逸挺, 王超, 李小云, 陈丽华, 苏宝连. 非金属元素掺杂及三维花状多级结构对介孔TiO₂可见光催化性能的促进作用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(3): 471.