非金属元素掺杂及三维花状多级结构对介孔TiO2可见光催化性能的促进作用

doi:10.7503/cjcu20160573

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

分别以尿素和葡萄糖为氮源和碳源, 在温和条件下合成了具有三维花状多级结构的氮/碳掺杂二氧化钛. 研究了非金属元素掺杂及三维花状多级结构对介孔TiO₂可见光催化性能的促进作用, 结果表明, 二者在增强TiO₂在可见光区域的吸收和提高TiO₂材料的光催化活性方面起到了协同促进的作用.

关键词: 二氧化钛, 三维花状多级结构, 非金属元素掺杂, 可见光催化剂

Abstract:

This study aimed at getting insight into the promoting effect of nonmetal ion(N and C) doping and hierarchically 3D dendrimeric architecture on mesoporous TiO₂ based photocatalysts for efficient visible light activated photocatalysis. A comparison of the photocatalytic efficiencies of bare and nonmetal ion doped mesoporous TiO₂ with/without-hierarchically 3D dendrimeric architectures was studied. The resultant photocatalytic performance of TiO₂ based samples was improved greatly by nonmetal doping treatment. Meanwhile, the mesoporous TiO₂ based materials with hierarchically 3D dendrimeric architecture present superior photocatalytic activity compared to the one without hierarchical structure.

Key words: Titania, 3D dendrimental nanostructure, Nonmetal doping, Visible light photocatalyst

中图分类号:

O643
O611

TrendMD:

张春磊, 黄丹娅, 孙明慧, 欧阳逸挺, 王超, 李小云, 陈丽华, 苏宝连. 非金属元素掺杂及三维花状多级结构对介孔TiO₂可见光催化性能的促进作用. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(3): 471.

ZHANG Chunlei, HUANG Danya, SUN Minghui, OUYANG Yiting, WANG Chao, LI Xiaoyun, CHEN Lihua, SU Baolian. Promoting Effect of Nonmetal Ion Doping and Hierarchically 3D Dendrimeric Architecture for Visible-light-active Mesoporous TiO₂ Photocatalyst^†. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2017, 38(3): 471.

图/表 12

Fig.1 High magnification SEM images of the nanoribbons in MT550(A), MTN350(B) and MTC550(C) The insets are corresponding low magnification SEM images of mesoporous TiO2 with hierarchically 3D dendrimeric architecture.

Fig.2 Low magnification TEM images of MT550(A), MTN350(B) and MTC550(C) The insets are corresponding HRTEM images.

Fig.3 XRD patterns of MTs(A), MTNs(B) and MTCs(C) a. MTRT; b. MT350; c. MT450; d. MT550.

Table 1 Textural properties of the synthesized samples

Sample	Crystalline size^a/nm	$S BET b$ /(m²·g^-1)	$D des c$ /nm	$V pore d$ /(cm³·g^-1)	Band-gap energy/eV
Sample	Crystalline size^a/nm	$S BET b$ /(m²·g^-1)	$D des c$ /nm	$V pore d$ /(cm³·g^-1)	E_g1	E_g2
MT350	13.6	76	76	0.20	3.24
MT450	18.2	44	44	0.17	3.23
MT550	27.3	33	33	0.14	3.22
MTN350	10.9	83	83	0.22	3.18	2.40
MTN450	16.6	55	55	0.16	3.19	2.41
MTN550	23.4	35	35	0.12	3.22
MTC350	10.2	197	197	0.25	3.23
MTC450	14.4	87	87	0.26	3.19
MTC550	20.5	64	64	0.23	3.17

Table 1 Textural properties of the synthesized samples

Sample	Crystalline size^a/nm	$S BET b$ /(m²·g^-1)	$D des c$ /nm	$V pore d$ /(cm³·g^-1)	Band-gap energy/eV
Sample	Crystalline size^a/nm	$S BET b$ /(m²·g^-1)	$D des c$ /nm	$V pore d$ /(cm³·g^-1)	E_g1	E_g2
MT350	13.6	76	76	0.20	3.24
MT450	18.2	44	44	0.17	3.23
MT550	27.3	33	33	0.14	3.22
MTN350	10.9	83	83	0.22	3.18	2.40
MTN450	16.6	55	55	0.16	3.19	2.41
MTN550	23.4	35	35	0.12	3.22
MTC350	10.2	197	197	0.25	3.23
MTC450	14.4	87	87	0.26	3.19
MTC550	20.5	64	64	0.23	3.17

Fig.4 N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms(A—C) and pore size distribution(A‘—C‘) of MTs(A, A‘), MTNs(B, B‘) and MTCs(C, C‘)

Fig.5 Ti2p(A) and O1s(B)XPS spectra of MT550(a), MTN350(b) and MTC550(c), N1s XPS spectra of MTN350(C) and C1s XPS spectra of MTC550(D)

Fig.6 Raman spectra of samples in the full length spectra(A) and expanded spectra for the Eg mode at 140.7 cm-1(B)

Fig.7 FTIR spectra of MTN350(a), MTC550(b) and MT550(c) in the range of 4000—500 cm-1(A) and 2500—1000 cm-1(B)

Fig.8 UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of MT550, MTN550, MTC550(A) and MT550, MTN350, MTC550(B) in the range of 350—800 nm

Table 2 Summary of UV-Visible light photocatalytic activity of samples*

Sample	Calcination temperature/℃	Degradation efficiency(%)			Degradation rate, k/min^-1
Sample	Calcination temperature/℃	MT	MTN	MTC	MT	MTN	MTC
With 3D dendrimeric architecture	350	89	91	93	0.055	0.058	0.072
	450	92	95	97	0.061	0.072	0.087
	550	98	99	100	0.120	0.140	0.190
With broken 3D dendrimeric architecture
	550	61	77	86	0.024	0.037	0.049

Fig.9 SEM images of samples with broken 3D dendrimeric architecture (A) MT550; (B) MTN550; (C) MTC550.

Table 3 Summary of visible light photocatalytic activity of samples*

Sample	Calcination temperature/℃	Degradation efficiency(%)		Degradation rate, k/min^-1
Sample	Calcination temperature/℃	MTN	MTC	MTN	MTC
With 3D dendrimeric architecture	350	100	84.7	5.45×10^-2	1.80×10^-2
	450	87.56	88.30	2.00×10^-2	2.12×10^-2
	550	86.63	97.60	1.95×10^-2	3.24×10^-2
Without 3D dendrimeric architecturea	350	45.5		6.1×10^-3
	550		42.5		5.7×10^-3

参考文献 34

[1]	Ding S., Zhu G. W., Wang R. W., Zhang Z. T., Qiu S. L., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2014, 35(5), 1016—1022
	(丁双, 朱国巍, 王润伟, 张宗弢, 裘式纶. 高等学校化学学报, 2014, 35(5), 1016—1022)
[2]	Guo H. F., Kenmell M., Heikkila M., Leskela M., J. Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 95(3), 358—364
[3]	Veréb G., Manczinger L., Bozsó G., Sienkiewicz A., Forró L., Mogyorósi K., Hernádi K., Dombi A., Applied Catalysis B: Environ., 2013, 129, 566—574
[4]	Wu M., Li Y., Deng Z., Su B. L., ChemSusChem,2011, 4, 1481—1488
[5]	Klosek S., Raftery D., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 2815—2819
[6]	Anpo M., Journal of Catalysis, 2003, 216, 505—516
[7]	Valentin C. D., Pacchioni G., Catalysis Today, 2013, 206(3), 12—18
[8]	Azami M. S., Ain S. K., Zaharudin R., Bakar F., Nawawi W. I., Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2016, 835, 372—377
[9]	Cao X., Liu C., Hu Y., Yang W., Chen J.,Journal of Nanomaterials, 2016, (12), 1—11
[10]	Ananpattarachai J., Seraphin S., Kajitvichyanukul P., Environmental Science & Pollution Research,2016, 23(4), 3884—3896
[11]	Dong F., Guo S., Wang H. Q., Li X. F., Wu Z. B., Eprint Arxiv, 2011, 115(27), 13285—13292
[12]	Bakar S. A., Ribeiro C., RSC Advances, 2016, 6(43), 36516—36527
[13]	Shi Q., Yang D., Jiang Z., Li J., Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic,2006, 43, 44—48
[14]	Zhao D., Chen C. C., Wang Y. F., Ji H. W., Ma W. H., Zang L., Zhao J. C., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 5993—6001
[15]	Albrbar A.
[16]	Liu G., Chen Z., Dong C., Zhao Y., Li F., Lu G. Q., Cheng H. M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 20823—20828
[17]	Chen Q.L., Wang Y., Zhong C. Y., Guo Y., Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 239—242, 1923—1928
[18]	Xu P., Li Y. J., Liu C., Li M., Deng R. H., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2014, 35(9), 1954—1961
	(徐鹏, 李佑稷, 刘晨, 李铭, 邓瑞成. 高等学校化学学报, 2014, 35(9), 1954—1961)
[19]	Tseng Y. H., Kuo C. S., Huang C. H., Nanotechnology,2006, 17(10), 2490—2497
[20]	Yang H. B., Rao W., Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 521, 576—580
[21]	Wang C. L. X., Journal of Materials Research, 2012, 27(27), 2265—2270
[22]	Li X. Y., Chen L. H., Li Y., Rooke J. C., Deng Z., Hu Z. Y., Liu J., Krief A., Yang X. Y., Su B. L., Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2012, 152, 110—121
[23]	Yoshitake M., Thananan A., Aizawaki T., Yoshihara K., Surface and Interface Analysis, 2002, 34, 698—702
[24]	Leprince-Wang Y., Surf Coat Tech., 2002, 150, 257—262
[25]	Ohno T., Tsubota T., Toyofuku M., Inaba R., Catal. Lett., 2004, 98, 255—258
[26]	Chen X. B., Lou Y. B., Samia A. C. S., Burda C., Gole J. L., Adv. Funct. Mater., 2005, 15, 41—49
[27]	Park Y., Kim W., Park H., Tachikawa T., Majima T., Choi W., Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 91, 355—361
[28]	Neville E. M., Mattle M. J., Loughrey D., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116(31), 16511—16521
[29]	Umrao S, Abraham S, Theil F, Pandey, S., Ciobota V., Shukla P. K., Rupp C J., Chakraborty S., Ahuja R., Popp J., Dietzek B., Srivastava A., Rsc Advances, 2014, 4(104), 59890—59901
[30]	Khan S. U. M., Al-Shahry M., Ingler Jr. W. B. , Science,2002, 297, 2243—2245
[31]	Miao Z., Xu D. S., Ouyang J. H., Guo G. L., Zhao X. H., Tang Y. Q., Nano Lett., 2002, 2, 717—720
[32]	Soler-Illia G. J. D. A., Louis A., Sanchez C., Chem. Mater., 2002, 14, 750—759
[33]	Xue Q. Q., He G. Z., Xia S. W., Pan G., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2013, 34(7), 1673—1678
	(薛倩倩, 何广智, 夏树伟, 潘纲. 高等学校化学学报, 2013, 34(7), 1673—1678)
[34]	Huang Y., Ho W., Lee S., Zhang L., Li G., Yu J. C., Langmuir,2008, 24, 3510—3516
	(Ed.:V, Z, K)

非金属元素掺杂及三维花状多级结构对介孔TiO₂可见光催化性能的促进作用

Promoting Effect of Nonmetal Ion Doping and Hierarchically 3D Dendrimeric Architecture for Visible-light-active Mesoporous TiO₂ Photocatalyst^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜珊, 申倩倩, 李琦, 贾虎生, 薛晋波. Pd增强缺陷态TiO₂纳米管阵列的光催化产氢性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2022, 43(10): 20220206.
[2]	吴启亮, 梅晋豪, 李铮, 范海东, 张彦威. 多种纳米结构Fe掺杂TiO₂光热耦合水分解制氢研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1837.
[3]	徐安琪, 李彬, 杜芳林. 有序介孔TiO₂的合成及光解水产氢应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2021, 42(4): 978.
[4]	李肖乾, 张华, 路海健, 刘畅, 刘庆龙, 马夏禹, 方媛萍, 梁大鹏. 内部萃取电喷雾电离质谱对二氧化钛纳米线阵列光催化降解罗丹明B反应机理的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(9): 2003.
[5]	王非凡, 王松博, 姚柯奕, 张蕾, 杜威, 程鹏高, 张建平, 唐娜. 量子点自修饰TiO₂p-n同质结的构建及光催化性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(7): 1615.
[6]	吴桐, 丛丽娜, 孙立群, 谢海明. 氧缺位结构介孔二氧化钛/聚乙烯复合隔膜在锂硫电池中的应用[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(7): 1661.
[7]	欧阳密, 陈璐, 胡旭明, 李裕文, 戴大程, 屠袁波, 白茹, 吕晓静, 张诚. TiO₂-PTPAT纳米核/壳结构复合膜的制备及电致变色性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(12): 2796.
[8]	郑姗, 刘洋, 陈飘飘, 邢怡晨, 黄朝表. 基于PbS QDs/TiO₂ NPs构建新型谷胱甘肽光电化学传感器[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(9): 1866.
[9]	惠龙飞, 李建国, 龚婷, 孙道安, 吕剑, 胡申林, 冯昊. 高长径比管式反应器内壁SiO₂与TiO₂钝化层的原子层沉积制备及抗积碳性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(2): 201.
[10]	梁芷珊, 倪爽, 代梦娇, 韩方杰, 韩立鹏, 牛利, 韩冬雪. 基于g-C₃N₄/P25复合光电敏感体系的中草药抗氧化容量测定[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(10): 2081.
[11]	阿山, 郑家威, 刘聚明, 白杰, 杨桔材, 张前程. 乙酸修饰Ag/TiO₂复合光催化剂的制备及协同催化性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(8): 1450.
[12]	李孝慈, 奚志文, 刘行, 李明, 郝志显, 朱志荣. TiO₂助剂对乙苯脱氢催化剂性能的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(7): 1229.
[13]	杨彩虹, 满春利, 薛琬蕾, 王挺, 陈迪, 陈潜, 吴礼光. 二氧化钛纳米粒子-氧化石墨烯/聚酰亚胺混合基质膜的原位聚合及气体渗透性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(4): 686.
[14]	郑家伟, 姜玲, 丁勇, 莫立娥, 丁有才, 胡林华, 戴松元. Au掺杂对TiO₂薄膜表面态及电荷传输性能的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(11): 2038.
[15]	高鹤, 梁大鑫, 李坚, 庞广生, 方振兴. 纳米TiO₂-ZnO二元负载木材的制备及性质[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(6): 1075.