硫代磷酸二乙酯类农药半抗原设计及抗体识别特性

高等学校化学学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 2193.

硫代磷酸二乙酯类农药半抗原设计及抗体识别特性

谢桂勉, 孙远明, 徐振林, 李永祥, 雷红涛, 王弘, 沈玉栋

华南农业大学食品学院, 广东省食品质量安全重点实验室, 广州 510642

收稿日期:2009-03-09 出版日期:2009-11-10 发布日期:2009-11-10
通讯作者: 沈玉栋, 男, 博士, 讲师, 主要从事食品质量安全研究. E-mail: sydscau@yahoo.cn
基金资助:
国家“八六三”计划(批准号: 2006AA10Z447, 2007AA10Z437)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 30901005)和广东省自然科学基金(批准号: 06300421)资助.

Design of Generic Haptens for O,O-Diethyl Phosphorothioate Pesticides and Recognition Properties of Antibodies

XIE Gui-Mian, SUN Yuan-Ming, XU Zhen-Lin, LI Yong-Xiang, LEI Hong-Tao, WANG Hong, SHEN Yu-Dong^*

College of Food Science/Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Received:2009-03-09 Online:2009-11-10 Published:2009-11-10
Contact: SHEN Yu-Dong. E-mail: sydscau@yahoo.cn
Supported by:
国家“八六三”计划(批准号: 2006AA10Z447, 2007AA10Z437)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 30901005)和广东省自然科学基金(批准号: 06300421)资助.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过分析硫代磷酸二乙酯类农药的结构特点, 设计并合成了系列半抗原; 采用活泼酯法将半抗原分别与牛血清蛋白(BSA)和卵清蛋白(OVA)偶联制备了系列免疫原和包被原; 通过免疫新西兰大白兔获得了相应抗硫代磷酸二乙酯类农药的类特异性抗体. 建立检测硫代磷酸二乙酯类农药的间接竞争酶联免疫分析(ELISA)方法, 分析探讨了免疫半抗原结构对抗体特性的影响, 并阐述了包被半抗原结构对ELISA灵敏度的影响规律. 结果表明, 手臂取代位置在苯环对位且手臂较短的免疫原具有较好的免疫效果, 同时异源包被可以显著提高ELISA方法的灵敏度. 由抗体PAb-H1和包被原H6-OVA建立的间接竞争ELISA方法可以同时检测7个广泛使用的有机磷农药, 其半抑制浓度(IC₅₀)分别为蝇毒磷(0.013 mg/L)、对硫磷(0.348 mg/L)、喹硫磷(0.022 mg/L)、三唑磷(0.035 mg/L)、甲拌磷(0.751 mg/L)、除线磷(0.850 mg/L)及辛硫磷(1.301 mg/L), 最低检测限符合国内外相关有机磷药物最大允许残留限量标准(MRLS)的检测要求.

关键词: 有机磷农药; 类特异性抗体; 异源包被; 酶联免疫分析

Abstract:

Class-specific polyclonal antibodies for O,O-diethyl phosphorothioate pesticides had been generated. A series of generic haptens were synthesized and coupled to bovine serum albumin(BSA) and ovalbumin(OVA) for immunogens and coating antigens, respectively. New Zealand rabbits were immunized with immunogens to obtain corresponding polyclonal antibodies. The effects of hapten structure on antibodies properties and hapten heterology on ELISA sensitivity were also investigated. The results show that haptens with simple spacer-arm can generate antibodies with desired properties, and hapten heterology can improve ELISA sensiti-vity significantly. The polyclonal antibody PAb-H1 shows high sensitivity to seven commonly used O,O-diethyl phosphorothioate pesticides in an indirect competitive ELISA using a heterologous coating antigen(H6-OVA). The 50% inhibition value(IC₅₀) is 0.013 mg/L for coumaphos, 0.348 mg/L for parathion, 0.022 mg/L for quinalphos, 0.035 mg/L for triazophos, 0.751 mg/L for phorate, 0.850 mg/L for dichlofenthion and 1.301 mg/L for phoxim, respectively. And the limit of detection(LOD) is lower than MRLS of all the seven O,O-diethyl phosphorothioate pesticides in food and agricultural products . Thus, this indirect ELISA with high sensitivity can potentially be used to develop commercial ELISA kits for a sensitive and rapid detection of O,O-diethyl phosphorothioate pesticides residues.

Key words: Organophosphorus pesticide; Generic hapten; Heterology coating; Enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay(ELISA)

TrendMD:

谢桂勉, 孙远明, 徐振林, 李永祥, 雷红涛, 王弘, 沈玉栋. 硫代磷酸二乙酯类农药半抗原设计及抗体识别特性. 高等学校化学学报, 2009, 30(11): 2193.

XIE Gui-Mian, SUN Yuan-Ming, XU Zhen-Lin, LI Yong-Xiang, LEI Hong-Tao, ....... Design of Generic Haptens for O,O-Diethyl Phosphorothioate Pesticides and Recognition Properties of Antibodies. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2009, 30(11): 2193.

参考文献

[1]Sultatosl L. G.. J. Toxicol. Env. Heal. A[J], 1994, 43: 271—289
[2]Miller J. K., Lenz D. E.. J. Appl. Toxicol.[J], 2001, 21: S23—S26
[3]Berijani S., Assadi Y., Anbia M., et al.. J. Chromatogr. A[J], 2006, 1123: 1—9
[4]Inoue S., Saito T., Mase H., et al.. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.[J], 2007, 44: 258—264
[5]Kolosova A. Y., Park J. H., Eremin S. A., et al.. Anal. Chim. Acta[J], 2004, 511: 323—331
[6]Farré M., Kantiani L., Barceló D.. Trac-Trend. Anal. Chem.[J], 2007, 26: 1100—1112
[7]Zhang Q., Sun Q., Hua B., et al.. Food Chem.[J], 2008, 106: 1278—1284
[8]Spinks C. A.. Trends Food Sci. Tech.[J], 2000, 11: 210—217
[9]Banks J. N., Chaudhry M. Q., Matthews W. A., et al.. Food Agric. Immunol.[J], 1998, 10: 349—361
[10]Johnson J. C., Emon J. M. V., Pullman D. R., et al.. J. Agric. Food Chem.[J], 1998, 46: 3116—3123
[11]Alcocer M. J. C., Dillon P. P., Manning B. M., et al.. J. Agric. Food Chem.[J], 2000, 48: 2228—2233
[12]Jang M. S., Lee S. J., Xue X., et al.. Korean Chem. Soc.[J], 2002, 23: 1116—1120
[13]LIU Xian-Jin(刘贤进), YAN Chun-Rong(颜春荣), LIU Yuan(刘媛), et al.. Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学)[J], 2008, 41(3): 727—733
[14]Trujillo-Ferrara J., Correa-Basurto J., Espinosa J., et al.. Synth. Commun.[J], 2005, 35: 2017—2023
[15]Newman D. J., Price C. P.. Ther. Drug Monit.[J], 1996, 18: 493—497
[16]LUO Ai-Lan(骆爱兰), YU Xiang-Yang(余向阳), ZHANG Cun-Zheng(张存政), et al.. Scientia Agricultura Sinica(中国农业科学)[J], 2005, 38(2): 308-312
[17]McAdam D. P., Hill A. S., Beasley H. L., et al.. J. Agric. Food Chem.[J], 1992, 40: 1466—1470
[18]Manclús J. J., Primo J., Montoya A.. J. Agric. Food Chem.[J], 1996, 44: 4052—4062
[19]Singh K. V., Jasdeep K., Grish C., et al.. Bioconjugate Chem.[J], 2004, 15: 168—173
[20]Kim Y. J., Cho Y. A., Lee H. S., et al.. Anal. Chim. Acta[J], 2003, 475: 85—96
[21]Kim Y. J., Cho Y. A., Lee H. S., et al.. Anal. Chim. Acta[J], 2003, 494: 29—40
[22]Liang Y., Liu X. J., Liu Y., et al.. Anal. Chim. Acta[J], 2008, 615: 174—183
[23]Shen Y. D., Zhang S. W., Xiao Z. L., et al.. Chinese Chem. Lett.[J], 2007: 1490—1492
[24]Shen Y. D., Zhang S. W., Lei H. T., et al.. Molecules[J], 2008, 13: 2238—2248
[25]Lee H. J., Shan G. M., Watanabe T., et al.. J. Agric. Food Chem.[J], 2002, 50: 5526—5532
[26]Galve R., Sanchez-Baeza F., Camps F., et al.. Anal. Chim. Acta[J], 2002, 452: 191—206