可见光/H2O2体系中的协同敏化

doi:10.7503/cjcu20190588

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

分析了可见光/H₂O₂体系中产生协同敏化效应的原因. 通过分析苯酚红、甲基橙、天青Ⅰ及三者混合物的紫外-可见光谱发现, 三者混合后拓宽了在可见光区的响应范围, 提高了对可见光的利用率. 采用邻菲罗啉法、二苯基卡巴肼法和磷钼酸铵分光光度法分别测试了上述有色物在可见光/H₂O₂体系中产生光生电子e、单线态氧和超氧阴离子自由基的量, 结果表明, 三者混合物在可见光下超氧阴离子自由基的产量明显比单独有色物的高, 光生电子和单线态氧的产量相差不大, 说明超氧阴离子自由基产量的提高是产生协同敏化的主要原因. 测试结果还证实光生电子不能催化过氧化氢产生羟自由基.

关键词: 光生电子, 单线态氧, 超氧阴离子自由基, 协同敏化

Abstract:

The causes of co-sensitization in the visible light/H₂O₂ system was analyzed. Through the analysis of the UV-Vis spectra of the phenol red, methyl orange, azure I and the mixed solution which consisted of all the three solutions mentioned above, it was seen that the mixed solution broadened the response range in the visible light region so that the utilization rate of visible light was increased. The yields of photoinduced electron(hydrated electron), singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radical generated under visible light in these matters mentioned above were tested by 1, 10-phenanthroline method, 1, 5-diphenylcarbazide method and ammonium molybdophosphate spectrophotometry. The result showed that the yields of superoxide anion radical in the mixed solution was significantly higher than that of the single chromophoric dissolved organic matters, more-over, the yields of photoinduced electron and singlet oxygen were not much different in each solution. Hence the increase of superoxide anion radical production is the main reason for the co-sensitization. In addition, experimental results confirmed that photoinduced electron could not catalyze hydrogen peroxide to generate hydroxyl radical.

Key words: Photoinduced electron, Singlet oxygen, Superoxide anion radical, Synergistic sensitization

中图分类号:

O644.11

TrendMD:

杨瑾,曹艳,张乃东. 可见光/H₂O₂体系中的协同敏化. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(3): 505.

YANG Jin,CAO Yan,ZHANG Naidong. Co-sensitization in the Visible Light/H₂O₂ System ^†. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2020, 41(3): 505.

图/表 8

参考文献 24

[1]	Kumara G. R. A., Kanebo S., Okuya M., Onwona-Agyeman B., Konno A., Tennakone K ., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2006, 90( 9), 1220— 1226
[2]	Chen X. L., Zhang X. P., Xie Z. T., Ma Y. L ., Micronanoelectronic Technology, 2019, 5( 9), 709— 714
	( 陈许龙, 张小萍, 谢占婷, 马元良 . 微纳电子技术, 2019, 5( 9), 709— 714)
[3]	Duvva N., Prasanthkumar S., Giribabu L ., Solar. Energy, 2019, 184, 620— 627
[4]	Galliano S., Bella F., Gerbaldi C., Falco M., Barolo C ., Energy Technology, 2017, 5( 2), 300— 311
[5]	Ran H. L., Fan J. J., Zhang X. L., Mao J., Shao G ., Applied Surface Science, 2018, 430, 415— 423
[6]	Ehret A., Stuhl L., Spitler M T ., J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105( 41), 9960— 9965
[7]	Dong L. H., Zheng Z. W., Wang Y. F., Li X., Hua J. L., Hu A. G ., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3( 21), 11607— 11614
[8]	Chang C. H., Chen Y. C., Hsu C. Y., Chou H. H., Lin J. T ., Org. lett., 2012, 14( 18), 4726— 4729
[9]	Bandara J., Kiwi J., Pulgarin C., Peringer P., Pajonk G. M., Elaloui A., Albers P ., Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30( 4), 1261— 1267
[10]	Wang S. J., Liu D. J., Jiang F., Wang S. W ., Journal of Guizhou University of Technology, 2004, 33( 1), 12— 14
	( 汪守建, 刘德启, 江飞, 王寿武 . 贵州工业大学学报, 2004, 33( 1), 12— 14)
[11]	Bors W., Lengfelder E., Saran M., Michel C., Fuchs C., Frenzel C ., Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1977, 75( 4), 973— 979
[12]	Li J. X., Wen X. R., Wu X. P ., Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2013, 32( 3), 86— 88
	( 李京雄, 温欣荣, 吴秀萍 . 分析试验室, 2013, 32( 3), 86— 88)
[13]	Steiner M. G., Babbs C. F. , Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1990, 278( 2), 478— 481
[14]	Xu X. R., Wang W. H., Li H. B ., Prog. Biochem. Biophys., 1999, 26( 1), 67— 69
	( 徐向荣, 王文华, 李华斌 . 生物化学与生物物理进展, 1999, 26( 1), 67— 69)
[15]	Sharpless C. M., Blough N. V ., Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, 2014, 16( 4), 654— 671
[16]	Sun L., Chen H. M., Abdulla H. A., Mopper K ., Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, 2014, 16( 4), 757— 763
[17]	Lee E., Glover C. M., Rosario-Ortiz F. L. , Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47, 12073— 12080
[18]	Thomas-Smith T. E., Blough N. V. , Environmental Science and Technology, 2001, 35( 13), 2721— 2726
[19]	Tang X. J., Wang Y. X., Kang C. L., Liu H. F., Chen B. Y., Qiu S. L ., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2015, 36( 9), 1719— 1723
	( 唐晓剑, 王依雪, 康春莉, 刘汉飞, 陈柏言, 裘式纶 . 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36( 9), 1719— 1723)
[20]	Li Y. Y., Pan Y. H., Lian L. S., Yan S. W., Song W. H., Yang X ., Water Research, 2017, 109, 266— 273
[21]	Fu X. R., Gu X. G., Lu S. G., Sharma V. K., Brusseau M. L., Xue Y. F ., Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 309, 22— 29
[22]	Bokare A. D., Choi W ., J. Hazard. Mater., 2014, 275, 121— 135
[23]	Cui H., Gu X. G., Lu S. G., Fu X. R., Zhang X ., Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 309, 80— 88
[24]	Zhang J. B., Sun X. H., Gao Q. J., Wang H. X., Liang D. X., Liu Z. M., Han G. T., Jiang W ., Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2019, 40( 3), 425— 430
	( 张巨擘, 孙晓晗, 高桥娇, 王海鑫, 梁大鑫, 刘志明, 韩光亭, 姜伟 . 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40( 3), 425— 430)

Colored substance	A
Colored substance	Before illumination	After illumination for 2 h
Phenol red	0.443	0.442
Methyl orange	1.351	1.353
AzureⅠ	0.512	0.510
Methyl orange+phenol red	1.013	1.016
AzureⅠ+methyl orange+phenol red	0.536	0.535
Direct fast brown M	0.467	0.469
Dianil brown 3GN	0.375	0.374

Colored substance	A
Colored substance	Before illumination	After illumination for 2 h
Phenol red	0.443	0.442
Methyl orange	1.351	1.353
AzureⅠ	0.512	0.510
Methyl orange+phenol red	1.013	1.016
AzureⅠ+methyl orange+phenol red	0.536	0.535
Direct fast brown M	0.467	0.469
Dianil brown 3GN	0.375	0.374

Colored substance	ΔA_{510 nm}
Colored substance	Ultraviolet	Visible light	Dark
Phenol red(yellow)	0.077	0.141	0
Methyl orange(red)	0.109	0.152	0
AzureⅠ(blue)	0.021	0.043	0
Methyl orange+phenol red(orange)	0.068	0.137	0
AzureⅠ+methyl orange+phenol red(brown)	0.114	0.157	0
Direct fast brown M(brown)	0.064	0.168	0
Dianil brown 3GN(brown)	0.060	0.186	0

Colored substance	ΔA_{510 nm}
Colored substance	Ultraviolet	Visible light	Dark
Phenol red(yellow)	0.077	0.141	0
Methyl orange(red)	0.109	0.152	0
AzureⅠ(blue)	0.021	0.043	0
Methyl orange+phenol red(orange)	0.068	0.137	0
AzureⅠ+methyl orange+phenol red(brown)	0.114	0.157	0
Direct fast brown M(brown)	0.064	0.168	0
Dianil brown 3GN(brown)	0.060	0.186	0

Colored substance	ΔA_{563 nm}
Colored substance	Ultraviolet	Visible light
Phenol red	0	0.022
Methyl orange	0	0.029
AzureⅠ	0	0.052
Methyl orange+phenol red	0	0.048
AzureⅠ+methyl orange+phenol red	0	0.043
Direct fast brown M	0	0.016
Dianil brown 3GN	0	0.024

可见光/H₂O₂体系中的协同敏化

Co-sensitization in the Visible Light/H₂O₂ System ^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 24

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Concentration of direct fast brown M/(mmol·L^-1)	ΔA_{720 nm}	A_{420 nm}
0.003	0	0
0.005	0.017	0
0.01	0.024	0.737
0.02	0.029	0.962
0.03	0.043	0.996

[1]	赵宇辉, 李明乐, 龙飒然, 樊江莉, 彭孝军. 极性敏感的BDP分子溶剂化效应的光谱性质[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(9): 2018.
[2]	李宪华, 张雷刚, 王雪雪, 于清波. 新颖光控Dex-H交联胶束药物释放体系的制备及协同抗肿瘤性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36(5): 1004.
[3]	李霞, 张霞, 朱泽峰, 林国庆, 李有彬, 李晓雪, 徐君莉. TiO₂/Ag₂NCN复合光催化剂的制备与可见光催化性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2015, 36(2): 361.
[4]	吕庆銮, 张苗, 岳宁宁, 宫斌, 王怀友. 荧光探针法研究铜离子-姜黄素体系中¹O₂的反应机理及在O₂^·-存在下¹O₂的测定[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2009, 30(3): 460.
[5]	孙涛, 徐铸德, 贾之慎. 功能化基团对C₆₀-β-丙氨酸衍生物清除超氧阴离子自由基O₂^-·能力的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2003, 24(7): 1231.
[6]	孙涛, 金亚旭, 陈万喜, 张欣欣, 陈卫祥, 徐铸德. 水溶性C₆₀-β丙氨酸衍生物清除超氧阴离子自由基O₂^-·及对小鼠胸腺细胞生长影响的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2002, 23(8): 1598.
[7]	孙健, 刘科, 徐英凯, 陈中伟, 刘扬. 类囊体膜光系统Ⅱ中超氧阴离子生成机制的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2002, 23(5): 979.
[8]	唐波, 刘阳, 唐晓玲. SDS-Schiff碱铜(Ⅱ)配合物模拟酶催化光度法研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2001, 22(6): 919.
[9]	杜鸣, 梁芳珍, 唐波, 沈含熙. 流动注射-光度法测定超氧阴离子自由基(O₂^-·)与超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性的研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1999, 20(3): 369.
[10]	谢英, 金虬, 李大珍, 高盘良, 自俊青. 停流法研究Cu(Ser)₂及Cu(Gly-Gly)₂催化O₂^·-歧化反应动力学[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1998, 19(8): 1288.
[11]	杨小南, 石俊英. 品红甲亚胺染料光褪色机理研究(Ⅰ)——与活性氧的反应能力[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1993, 14(2): 204.
[12]	陈暨耀, 陆亚蒙, 陈士明, 蔡怀新, 许德余, 王绍寅. meso-四-(取代苯基)卟吩衍生物产生单线态氧的ESR研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1991, 12(7): 970.