磁控溅射法制备CeO2/PTFE/Nafion复合膜及性能研究

doi:10.7503/cjcu20160282

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用磁控溅射法在聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)微孔膜表面溅射CeO₂, 制备了CeO₂/PTFE复合膜. 利用接触角、 X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和拉伸强度等对复合膜的亲水性、元素组成、形貌和机械强度进行测试, 研究了溅射时间和溅射功率对膜性能的影响. 结果表明, 在溅射功率为40 W, 溅射时间为120 s时, CeO₂/PTFE复合膜亲水性和拉伸强度都相对较好. 在CeO₂/PTFE复合膜上浇铸Nafion树脂, 制备的CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion复合膜含水率达到30%, 离子电导率达到0.071 S/cm.

关键词: 聚四氟乙烯微孔膜, 磁控溅射, 接触角, 拉伸强度

Abstract:

CeO₂/PTFE composite membranes(PTFE=polytetrafluoroethylene) were prepared by magnetron sputtering CeO₂ on the surface of PTFE microporous membranes. The membranes were characterized by XPS and SEM. The properties of the membranes, such as contact angle, tensile strength were investigated. It was found that high quality CeO₂/PTFE composite membranes were obtained under the optimized magnetron sputtering: sputtering time of 120 s and magnetic sputtering power of 40 W. The CeO₂/PTFE composite membranes exhibited better comprehensive performance: favorable hydrophibility and tensile strength. In order to improve the performance of CeO₂/PTFE composite membranes, CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion composite membranes were prepared by Nafion casting. The properties of the composite membrane such as water uptake, ion conductivity were investigated. The water uptake and ion conductivity of CeO₂/PTFE /Nafion composite membranes were 30%, 0.071 S/cm, respectively.

Key words: Polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE) microporous membrane, Magnetron sputtering, Contact angle, Tensile strength

中图分类号:

O632
O646

夏庆成, 毛霏, 杨勇, 韩静, 刘晓慧, 杨加志, 孙东平. 磁控溅射法制备CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion复合膜及性能研究[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(11): 2108-2116.

XIA Qingcheng, MAO Fei, YANG Yong, HAN Jing, LIU Xiaohui, YANG Jiazhi, SUN Dongping. Properties of CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion Composite Membranes Prepared by Magnetron Sputtering^†[J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2016, 37(11): 2108-2116.

图/表 12

Fig.1 Influence of sputtering power and sputtering time on contact angle of CeO2/PTFE composite MembraneSupttering power/W: a. 20; b. 40; c. 80.

Fig.2 Contact angle of CeO2/PTFE composite membrane at different sputtering time Sputtering power: 40 W. Sputtering time/s: (A) 0; (B) 30; (C) 60; (D) 90; (E) 120; (F) 150.

Fig.3 XRD patterns of CeO2/PTFE composite membrane at different sputtering time

Fig.4 XRD patterns of PTFE(a), CeO2/PTFE(b) and CeO2/PTFE/Nafion membranes(c)

Fig.5 Wide range XPS spectra of PTFE membrane and CeO2/PTFE, CeO2/PTFE/Nafion composite membrane(A), narrow XPS spectra of Ce element in CeO2/PTFE composite membrane(B) and S element in CeO2/PTFE/Nafion composite membrane(C)Insets of (B) and (C) are Ce and S mapping pictures, respectively.

Fig.6 SEM images of native PTFE membrane(A), CeO2/PTFE composite membrane(B), CeO2/PTFE/Nafion composite membrane(C) and elemental analysis graph(D) of CeO2/PTFE/Nafion composite membrane

Fig.8 TGA curves of PTFE(a) and CeO2/PTFE(b—d) membranes at different sputtering time Sputtering power: 40 W. Sputtering time/s: b. 30, c. 60, d. 120.

Fig.9 Rate of accelerating chemical degradation of PTEE(a) and CeO2/PTFE(b) membranes in Fenton’s reagent

Fig.10 Mechanical property of the CeO2/PTFE composite membrane with different sputtering time

Fig.11 Water absorption rate() and swelling property() of PTFE membrane,CeO2/PTFE composite membrane and CeO2/PTFE/Nafion composite membrane

Table 1 Swelling properties of composite membrane

Membrane	Length change(%)	Breadth change(%)	Thickness change(%)	Area swelling ratio(%)	Volume swelling ratio(%)
PTFE	0.26	0.24	0.16	0.5	0.66
CeO₂/PTFE	0.27	0.25	0.18	0.53	0.71
CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion	0.4	0.38	0.36	0.75	1.15

Fig.12 Ionic conductivity of CeO2/PTFE/Nafion composite membrane at different temperatures

参考文献 39

[1]	Mauritz K., A. , Moore R., B. , Chem. Rev., 2004, 104( 10), 4535- 4586
[2]	Kang J., J. , Li W., Y. , Lin, Y. , Li X., P. , Xiao X., R. , Fang S., B. , Polym. Adv. Technol., 2004, 15( 1/2), 61- 64
[3]	Jacobson M., Z. , Colella W., G. , Golden D., M. , Science, 2005, 308( 5730), 1901- 1905
[4]	Steele B. C., H. , Heinzel, A. , Nature, 2001, 414( 6861), 345- 352
[5]	Prokop, M. , Bystron, T. , Bouzek, K. , Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 160, 214- 218
[6]	Dicks A., L. , Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2004, 8( 5), 379- 383
[7]	Baldinelli, A. , Barelli, L. , Bidini, G. , Energy, 2015, 90, 2070- 2084
[8]	Jasti, A. , Shahi V., K. , J. Power Sources, 2014, 267, 714- 722
[9]	Ferreira A., P. , Chaparro A., M. , J. Power Sources, 2014, 272, 79- 89
[10]	Cui, Z. , Li, N. , Zhou, X. , Liu C., P. , Liao J., H. , Zhang S., B. , Xing, W. , J. Power Sources, 2007, 173( 1), 162- 165
[11]	Magalad V., T. , Pattanashetti S., S. , Gokavi G., S. , Nadagouda M., N. , Aminabhavi T., M. , Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 189, 1- 4
[12]	Fang S., Y. , Teoh L., G. , Huang R., H. , Hsueh K., L. , Yang K., H. , Chao W., K. , Shieu F., S. , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39( 36), 21177- 21184
[13]	谢晓峰, 张迪, 毛宗强, 吴秋林. 膜科学与技术, 2005, 25( 4), 44- 50
	Xie X., F. , Zhang, D. , Mao Z., Q. , Wu Q., L. , Membrane Science and Technology, 2005, 25( 4), 44- 50 (
[14]	刘富强, 邢丹敏, 于景荣, 衣宝廉, 张华民. 电化学, 2002, 8( 1), 86- 92
	Liu F., Q. , Xin D., M. , Yu J., R. , Yi B., L. , Zhang H., M. , Electrochemistry, 2002, 8( 1), 86- 92 (
[15]	Husaini, T. , Daud W. R., W. , Yaakob, Z. , Majlan. E., H. , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40( 32), 10072- 10080
[16]	Wu, B. , Zhao, M. , Shi W., Y. , Liu W., N. , Liu J., G. , Xing D., M. , Yao Y., F. , Hou Z., J. , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39( 26), 14381- 14390
[17]	Trogadas, P. , Parrondo, J. , Ramani, V. , Int. J. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2008, 11( 7), B113- B116
[18]	Trogadas, P. , Parrondo, J. , Ramani, V. , Chemical Communications, 2011, 47( 41), 11549- 11551
[19]	Wu N., C. , Shi E., W. , Zheng Y., Q. , Li W., J. , J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2002, 85( 10), 2462- 2468
[20]	Zhou, F. , Zhao, X. , Xu, H. , Yuan C., G. , J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111( 4), 1651- 1657
[21]	Inaba, M. , Kinumoto, T. , Kiriake, M. , Umebayashi, R. , Tasaka, A. , Ogumi, Z. , Electrochimica Acta, 2006, 51( 26), 5746- 5753
[22]	Fedotov A., A. , Grigoriev S., A. , Lyutikova E., K. , Millet., P. , Fateev V., N. , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38( 1), 426- 430
[23]	Fiala, R. , Vaclavu, M. , Vorokhta, M. , Khalakhan, I. , Lavkova., J. , Potin, V. , Matolinova, I. , Motalin, V. , J. Power Sources, 2015, 273, 105- 109
[24]	Hunke, H. , Soin, N. , Shah, T. , Kramer, E. , Witan, K. , Siores, E. , Wear, 2015, 328, 480- 487
[25]	韩晓燕, 张政朴. 高等学校化学学报, 2009, 30( 3), 618- 624
	Han X., Y. , Zhang Z., P. , Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2009, 30( 3), 618- 624 (
[26]	陈艳, 陈宏善, 康永刚. 高等学校化学学报, 2006, 27( 11), 2160- 2163
	Chen, Y. , Chen H. S., Kang Y. G., Chem. J. Chinese Universities , 2006, 27(11), 2160- 2163 (
[27]	Ying Y., L. , Goh Y., M. , Liu, C. , Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52( 33), 11564- 11574
[28]	王晓恩, 肖立奇, 唐浩林, 潘牧. 武汉理工大学学报, 2006, 28( 2), 437- 441
	Wang X., E. , Xiao L., Q. , Tang H., L. , Pan, M. , J. Wuhan. Univ. Technol., 2006, 28( 2), 437- 441 (
[29]	Tsai J., C. , Lin C., K. , J. TaiWan. Inst. Chem. E., 2011, 42( 6), 945- 951
[30]	Tang, H. , Pan, M. , Wang, F. , Shen. P., K. , Jiang S., P. , J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111( 30), 8684- 8690
[31]	Bi, C. , Zhang, H. , Xiao, S. , Xiao S., H. , Zhang, Y. , Mai Z., S. , Li X., F. , J. Membrane Science, 2011, 376( 1), 170- 178
[32]	Shi, S. , Chen, G. , Wang, Z. , Chen X., J. , Power Sources, 2013, 238, 318- 323
[33]	Cui M., Y. , He J., X. , Lu N., P. , Zheng W., J. , Dong W., H. , Tang B., Y. , Chen C., R. , Mater. Chem. Phys., 2010, 121( 1), 314- 319
[34]	Lin K., S. , Chowdhury, S. , Int. J. Molecular Sciences, 2010, 11( 9), 3226- 3251
[35]	Teranishi, K. , Kawata, K. , Tsushima, S. , Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2006, 9( 10), A475- A477
[36]	Khalakhan, I. , Vorokhta, M. , Chundak, M. , Matolin, V. , Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 267, 150- 153
[37]	Idris S., S. , Rahman N., A. , Ismail, K. , Bioresource Technology, 2012, 123, 581- 591
[38]	Lu, C. , Rice, C. , Masel R., I. , J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106( 37), 9581- 9589
[39]	Ochi, S. , Kamishima, O. , Mizusaki, J. , Kawamura, J. , Solid State Ionics, 2009, 180( 6), 580- 584

磁控溅射法制备CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion复合膜及性能研究

Properties of CeO₂/PTFE/Nafion Composite Membranes Prepared by Magnetron Sputtering^†

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒋华义,刘梅,齐红媛,梁爱国,王玉龙,孙娜娜,武哲. 三种钢基疏水表面微观形貌的分形特征及其对润湿性的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2020, 41(6): 1313-1319.
[2]	刘家明, 傅凯林, 张泽, 郭伟, 潘牧. 织构气体扩散层表面氢氧燃料电池阴极超低Pt载量催化层的磁控溅射法制备[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40(3): 542-547.
[3]	高飞龙, 李永存, 栾云博, 薛志成, 郭章新, 张祺, 吴桂英. 不同石墨烯-碳纳米管杂化体系对热塑性聚氨酯复合材料力学和自修复性能的增强机制[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2018, 39(4): 832-840.
[4]	徐一鑫, 张登骥, 叶妮雅, 杨景帅, 何荣桓. 1,4-双(二苯基膦)丁烷交联的季膦化聚芳醚酮阴离子交换膜[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2017, 38(10): 1872-1879.
[5]	刘尧华, 林宇, 张栋葛, 陈春蕾, 吴国章, 张衍, 栾伟玲. 天然橡胶/石墨烯纳米复合材料的制备及耐核辐射性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37(7): 1402-1407.
[6]	贾原媛, 万同, 霍明明, 闫蒙蒙, 贾士儒, 陈晗, 周余来. 细菌纤维素纳米纤维稳定乳液的性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2013, 34(6): 1475-1482.
[7]	杨珊, 王彦兵, 宗明明, 宫铭, 马佳妮, 宫永宽. 仿细胞膜结构共聚物的合成及涂层性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2012, 33(07): 1579-1585.
[8]	连峰, 张会臣, 邹赫麟, 庞连云. 反应离子刻蚀和自组装分子膜构建硅基底疏水与超疏水表面[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2011, 32(12): 2833-2837.
[9]	李振泉王增林张磊徐志成张路赵濉. 阳离子和两性表面活性剂对石英表面润湿性的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2011, 32(10): 2376-2381.
[10]	万海燕, 魏彦林, 赵宝明, 陈亚芍. 利用等离子体技术研究聚苯乙烯表面的接枝聚合反应[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2009, 30(7): 1365-1370.
[11]	张梁堂, 宋杰, 蔡敏真, 徐富春, 吴孙桃, 董全峰. 磁控溅射制备的铜钒氧化物薄膜及其电化学性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2009, 30(5): 971-975.
[12]	宋英杰,张宏芳,伏萍萍,杨化滨,周作祥,吴孟涛,黄来和 . 锂离子电池用非晶态Si/Al/Si薄膜负极材料[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2008, 29(3): 573-577.
[13]	谢永元, 周勇亮, 俞小春, 夏海平 . 以砂纸为模板制作聚合物超疏水表面[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2007, 28(8): 1577-1580.
[14]	黄金昭,徐征,,李海玲,亢国虎,王文静 . 射频磁控溅射制备纳米晶Ni-Mo催化阴极及其表征[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2006, 27(5): 909-913.
[15]	张庆华, 刘龙孝, 陈丰秋, 詹晓力. 采用XPS与接触角法研究氟聚合物表面结构与性能[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2006, 27(4): 790-792.